TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 Boston College  9-23 (0.281)  |  ACC
All-Play Percentage: 0.597 (142nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.688 (53rd)
Record Quality: -0.123 (232nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 153.01 (154th)
Pace: 72.45 (61st)
Momentum: -2.73 (283rd)
Off. Momentum: 1.23 (142nd)
Def. Momentum: -3.96 (334th)
Consistency: -10.19 (313th)
Res. Consistency: -12.48 (249th)
Away From Home: -0.60 (218th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 2.56 (5th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 101.87 24.68 68.67 80.30 45.95 28.95 38.44 23.27 36.77 28.08 61.31 11.73 12.64 6.90 36.05 28.98 34.97 2.01
RANK: 160th 268th 239th 243rd 88th 199th 35th 191st 156th 190th 114th 111th 275th 142nd 178th 170th 171st 180th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.15 27.37 -- 78.79 45.48 27.30 35.82 24.51 39.32 26.98 60.87 10.03 12.18 6.28 34.65 31.11 34.24 2.00
RANK: 173rd 163rd -- 56th 223rd 72nd 197th 209th 292nd 118th 202nd 115th 29th 132nd 109th 254th 150th 205th

ANALYSIS:
Boston College is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. Carrying a record of 9-23, they are currently rated #142 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of 15) in the ACC (average ranking 47.2).

Boston College will likely rely on their offense more than anything else to win games. The team is ranked 160th in offensive efficiency and scores more than 101 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Boston College is one of the more accurate teams in the college game when it comes to shooting the three. They're ranked 35th nationally in three-point field goal percentage and make about 38.4% of their attempts from there vs. AO.

Boston College plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 173rd nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 102 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Boston College is a solid rebounding team that will deny the opposition chances to score off of offensive rebounds. They have a rating of 12.18 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked 29th in the country). Boston College also has been doing fairly decent work to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 56th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 78.79 vs. AO.

Boston College has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 313th in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Boston College is typically better vs. teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.59%, Boston College performs above their norm 70% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 17% of the time.
When facing teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass, Boston College often performs worse than normal. Boston College is more efficient than usual 17% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.78%. In their other contests, Boston College performs better than the norm 70% of the time.
Boston College does better vs. clubs that find ways to get to the free throw line. When playing squads that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 27.41, Boston College performs above average 64% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 20% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25171st171st287th182ndACC228th333rd89th201st148th170th
2023-2459th59th162nd80thACC245th87th62nd299th119th68th
2022-23158th158th207th139thACC224th229th90th85th55th181st
2021-22112th112th263rd181stACC315th258th88th262nd162nd139th
2020-21186th186th329th246thACC43rd257th41st302nd68th127th
2019-20193rd193rd264th143rdACC132nd349th45th319th218th165th
2018-19103rd102nd223rd140thACC211th237th61st6th6th97th
2017-1872nd72nd161st92ndACC89th194th56th289th260th74th
2016-17142nd142nd312th232ndACC61st313th53rd5th218th154th
2015-16209th209th335th262ndACC246th174th48th257th262nd222nd
2014-1585th85th249th150thACC258th55th34th60th152nd104th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25155th172nd148th132nd148th292nd87th40th108th228th215th297th106th86th296th38th249th126th
2023-2454th271st72nd34th67th117th45th133rd218th169th43rd73rd89th17th157th157th221st213th
2022-23186th230th115th200th127th329th188th158th101st49th219th190th98th50th324th154th34th19th
2021-22134th97th243rd88th109th317th317th158th117th7th164th63rd42nd30th331st181st12th9th
2020-21149th92nd178th274th162nd49th182nd343rd210th169th136th112th224th208th31st339th128th270th
2019-20235th192nd311th144th246th114th319th206th303rd177th98th51st132nd165th124th215th174th218th
2018-1999th65th176th60th175th184th245th55th128th209th108th161st77th164th219th67th247th191st
2017-1851st136th51st113th56th120th78th152nd36th192nd56th221st177th135th133rd164th217th223rd
2016-17160th268th239th243rd88th199th35th191st156th190th114th111th275th142nd178th170th171st180th
2015-16292nd336th319th286th199th82nd257th270th119th263rd142nd115th301st313th65th261st225th281st
2014-1560th131st69th291st26th96th130th335th46th65th54th93rd339th244th69th334th44th154th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25194th206th--244th173rd96th231st303rd211th207th116th97th107th119th76th294th181st254th
2023-2481st51st--267th62nd248th74th276th301st95th23rd139th48th50th219th275th78th93rd
2022-23150th72nd--252nd119th269th269th196th239th170th33rd243rd282nd140th249th170th137th117th
2021-22134th142nd--93rd151st179th288th102nd47th196th110th167th92nd118th203rd117th227th194th
2020-21206th75th--163rd296th145th227th55th345th310th151st251st62nd83rd145th54th317th284th
2019-20153rd103rd--131st211th147th196th60th77th284th204th94th308th228th165th56th309th267th
2018-19139th56th--315th73rd296th45th110th24th250th122nd144th193rd84th253rd81st197th157th
2017-18155th19th--217th148th318th274th134th152nd113th113th52nd40th140th311th115th106th70th
2016-17173rd163rd--56th223rd72nd197th209th292nd118th202nd115th29th132nd109th254th150th205th
2015-16103rd121st--34th197th98th294th146th160th118th158th214th49th217th171st204th172nd178th
2014-15127th191st--135th117th140th146th178th153rd167th99th28th82nd101st151st195th185th194th