TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Louisville  4-28 (0.125)  |  ACC
All-Play Percentage: 0.262 (268th)
Schedule Strength: 0.667 (52nd)
Record Quality: -0.259 (310th)
Avg. Season Rank: 271.36 (275th)
Pace: 66.63 (252nd)
Momentum: 0.68 (138th)
Off. Momentum: 4.14 (17th)
Def. Momentum: -3.46 (331st)
Consistency: -9.76 (250th)
Res. Consistency: -11.04 (109th)
Away From Home: -1.61 (293rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.26 (133rd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 101.03 26.76 73.97 80.46 44.67 27.34 34.26 24.86 37.23 28.26 61.28 7.86 15.77 7.05 33.97 30.90 35.13 1.99
RANK: 205th 104th 102nd 342nd 132nd 303rd 165th 150th 214th 237th 106th 327th 84th 31st 271st 115th 174th 115th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 109.80 25.08 -- 88.30 45.11 35.76 33.95 20.59 38.91 31.96 61.60 13.25 15.45 6.31 40.49 23.31 36.19 2.04
RANK: 316th 176th -- 328th 242nd 340th 170th 45th 224th 287th 276th 339th 292nd 301st 310th 18th 244th 120th

ANALYSIS:
If you see Louisville on the schedule, you will likely get one of the average to below-average teams in college hoops. They are ranked #268 (out of 363) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 4-28. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of 15) in the ACC (average ranking 97.1).

Defense is not exactly a strength for Louisville this year. The team is ranked 316th in defensive efficiency and allows more than 109 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Louisville struggles on occasion to deny opponents opportunities to shoot from the floor. The team is ranked 328th in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 88.30 vs. AO. Louisville also does a pretty inadequate job to provide chances for themselves to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked #327 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 7.86 vs. AO.

Even though the team ranks considerably higher in offensive efficiency, Louisville isn't a powerhouse on that end of the floor either. Scoring roughly 101 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #205 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Louisville happens to be one of the very worst in the game when it comes to maximizing the number of shot attempts they get off from the floor. The team is nationally ranked 342nd in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 80.46 vs. AO. Louisville also tends to be very careless with the ball and allows far too many breakaway opportunities off of their own turnovers. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 13.25, which ranks 339th in D1. If Louisville does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to obtain and convert second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad has a second-chance conversion percentage of 7.1% vs. AO, which ranks 31st in the nation.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that favor a faster tempo, Louisville usually performs better than average. Louisville is more efficient than normal 73% of the time when facing clubs that have a pace vs. AO greater than 68.04. In all other contests, Louisville performs better than average 29% of the time.
Louisville is typically worse vs. teams that effectively clean the offensive glass. Against foes that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.19, Louisville performs above their norm 38% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 73% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2531st31st20th14thACC81st264th48th135th8th44th
2023-24177th177th337th248thACC63rd218th56th10th30th205th
2022-23268th268th360th310thACC252nd250th52nd133rd293rd275th
2021-22120th120th256th152ndACC194th243rd54th164th225th95th
2020-2178th78th87th35thACC269th288th49th332nd344th48th
2019-2010th10th19th14thACC239th277th61st197th255th7th
2018-1922nd22nd114th49thACC224th266th21st303rd18th19th
2017-1835th35th108th61stACC122nd278th49th247th77th37th
2016-1716th15th36th17thACC216th252nd16th289th294th13th
2015-168th8th39th24thACC284th234th70th343rd351st3rd
2014-1515th15th21st14thACC190th89th17th309th46th14th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2538th85th103rd146th51st36th149th303rd21st203rd22nd124th171st185th36th308th208th302nd
2023-24173rd25th71st338th103rd340th229th89th150th217th90th169th158th30th324th59th153rd65th
2022-23205th104th102nd342nd132nd303rd165th150th214th237th106th327th84th31st271st115th174th115th
2021-22160th200th325th70th157th93rd295th159th156th217th43rd192nd54th73rd110th187th246th261st
2020-21109th50th168th20th197th291st323rd24th155th101st143rd242nd10th22nd322nd46th172nd70th
2019-2014th85th116th39th33rd120th14th91st113th202nd35th237th55th41st167th114th253rd228th
2018-1927th55th8th81st101st60th105th225th272nd171st35th288th148th233rd81st249th200th250th
2017-1859th106th128th143rd52nd267th19th50th165th224th32nd20th86th84th273rd56th236th140th
2016-1726th66th259th7th43rd209th51st101st107th39th65th39th26th9th259th149th76th65th
2015-1635th162nd145th7th48th218th149th69th130th54th32nd28th23rd12th274th103rd122nd80th
2014-1548th49th239th53rd69th256th168th31st89th176th35th58th105th146th280th45th226th120th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2528th12th--159th41st200th74th288th36th60th91st91st158th78th212th293rd58th89th
2023-24225th233rd--57th258th241st310th186th151st52nd328th335th115th125th280th218th81st66th
2022-23316th176th--328th242nd340th170th45th224th287th276th339th292nd301st310th18th244th120th
2021-22113th87th--187th120th255th208th248th57th73rd195th225th18th8th246th239th69th67th
2020-2143rd111th--224th48th271st7th284th132nd48th190th47th264th132nd254th277th37th52nd
2019-2032nd70th--136th26th277th58th306th97th8th106th20th12th13th294th321st8th13th
2018-1926th92nd--233rd18th238th27th251st5th113th63rd51st85th3rd212th237th102nd118th
2017-1828th60th--269th25th133rd47th298th19th151st39th50th301st219th99th289th119th170th
2016-179th151st--93rd12th136th10th175th16th128th32nd28th139th66th171st209th148th175th
2015-161st183rd--15th2nd110th26th120th1st92nd9th106th4th3rd213th188th157th142nd
2014-155th44th--142nd9th168th17th273rd20th74th19th37th180th81st181st283rd75th105th