TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 Notre Dame  20-12 (0.625)  |  ACC
All-Play Percentage: 0.872 (46th)
Schedule Strength: 0.616 (85th)
Record Quality: 0.228 (63rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 81.80 (83rd)
Pace: 69.02 (214th)
Momentum: -0.48 (206th)
Off. Momentum: -1.23 (288th)
Def. Momentum: 0.75 (98th)
Consistency: -10.48 (324th)
Res. Consistency: -9.59 (37th)
Away From Home: -1.64 (281st)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.36 (224th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.29 22.56 73.82 88.44 44.19 38.51 34.99 23.29 39.60 26.64 61.52 11.77 14.88 5.71 43.54 26.34 30.12 2.13
RANK: 32nd 293rd 89th 6th 123rd 15th 82nd 154th 66th 240th 95th 125th 72nd 86th 42nd 213th 305th 329th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 94.96 17.36 -- 87.37 40.92 32.65 33.33 29.51 35.70 25.20 56.88 8.36 12.41 5.25 37.37 33.78 28.84 2.09
RANK: 85th 1st -- 344th 61st 263rd 168th 345th 115th 47th 98th 17th 135th 213th 171st 336th 17th 62nd

ANALYSIS:
This website places Notre Dame in the top 25% of all NCAA college basketball teams this year. Haslametrics has them ranked 46th overall (out of 353) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 20-12. They are also ranked by this site as the #5 team (out of 15) in the ACC (average ranking 69.6).

Notre Dame has a reasonably potent offensive attack. Occupying the #32 slot in our offensive efficiency rankings, they will score about 108 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Notre Dame is one of the very best when it comes to maximizing field goal opportunities. The team is ranked sixth in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 88.44 vs. AO. As far as making those field goal attempts goes, the team is somewhat middle-of-the-road, converting about 44.2% of them vs. AO. Notre Dame also allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 8.36, which ranks #17 in the country.

Notre Dame is also a fairly decent team on the defensive end of the court. The team ranks 85th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 95 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Notre Dame is a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 17.36 vs. AO, they are currently rated first in the country in that category. Notre Dame has also had some success this season preventing opponents from converting many of their overall field goal attempts. The team ranks #61 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO only makes good on about 40.9% of their total attempts from the floor. If Notre Dame does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's propensity to allow too many shot attempts per trip. The squad has a rating of 87.37 in defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks tenth-worst in college basketball.

Notre Dame has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 324th in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that are typically efficient on offense, Notre Dame often performs worse than normal. Notre Dame is more efficient than usual 21% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 101.83. In their other contests, Notre Dame performs better than the norm 72% of the time.
Notre Dame does worse vs. clubs that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.70%, Notre Dame performs above average 36% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 80% of the time.
Notre Dame performs worse against squads that find ways to get to the free throw line. When facing teams that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 29.46, Notre Dame is more efficient than normal 20% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 64% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Notre Dame cruises past Boston College in ACC tourney opener
(3/12/2020 6:09:00 AM) GREENSBORO, N.C. — One down, three to go. Needing to win four games in four days to get to the NCAA Tournament, if there even is an NCAA Tournament, No. 7 seed Notre Dame beat No. 10 seed Boston College, 80-58, Wednesday in a second round Atlantic Coast Conference Tournament game at Greensboro Coliseum. “When you look up and can get it to ...
Notre Dame tops Boston College 80-58 to advance in ACCs
(3/11/2020 11:13:00 PM) T.J. Gibbs scored 16 points and Dane Goodwin added 15 points, and Notre Dame defeated Boston College 80-58 on Wednesday. The Irish (20-12) won in an unconventional manner as five different players scored in double digits, none of which were Associated Press first-team All-ACC selection Mooney. Prentiss Hubb had 14 points for Notre Dame ...
Notre Dame stages big comeback to beat North Carolina
(2/18/2020 12:44:00 AM) Nate Laszewski hit a three-pointer with 1.8 seconds left as Notre Dame stormed back from a 15-point second-half deficit for a 77-76 victory over beleaguered North Carolina. Rex Pflueger (right ...
Notre Dame rallies past UNC on late 3-pointer
(2/18/2020 12:12:00 AM) Nate Laszewski drained a 3-pointer with 2.4 seconds to remaining to complete Notre Dame’s second-half comeback, and the Fighting Irish earned a 77-76 victory against North Carolina on Monday night in South Bend,
WATCH: Notre Dame downs North Carolina on late shot
(2/17/2020 10:14:00 PM) And now North Carolina can add Notre Dame to its list of recent late-game woes. After building a 15-point lead in the second half, Fighting Irish sophomore Nate Laszewski hit a game-winning 3-pointer with just 2.4 seconds remaining to give Notre Dame a 77-76 come-from-behind victory. If you’re a Notre Dame fan, it was a thing of beauty.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2596th96th231st138thACC320th282nd69th142nd37th74th
2023-24108th108th280th159thACC329th161st57th52nd229th141st
2022-23142nd142nd295th217thACC293rd160th92nd67th238th118th
2021-2246th46th65th39thACC263rd235th46th59th232nd67th
2020-2186th85th228th128thACC240th266th40th223rd183rd70th
2019-2046th45th91st63rdACC214th324th85th224th281st83rd
2018-1988th88th242nd161stACC313th183rd55th38th34th65th
2017-1848th47th126th76thACC311th105th58th99th153rd47th
2016-1725th25th43rd24thACC256th1st33rd292nd266th16th
2015-1643rd43rd68th30thACC334th247th18th291st293rd29th
2014-1510th10th11th8thACC277th141st62nd219th106th15th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2592nd90th128th170th114th221st140th88th93rd255th93rd319th238th164th220th93rd265th193rd
2023-24178th205th107th185th218th72nd148th234th203rd257th219th236th195th280th64th229th253rd297th
2022-2396th302nd24th91st135th54th85th196th91st247th142nd299th282nd217th70th214th275th306th
2021-2229th212th92nd109th28th117th10th287th37th65th121st326th194th144th129th294th87th162nd
2020-2127th167th21st127th34th51st53rd299th118th135th26th292nd253rd177th61st308th149th255th
2019-2032nd293rd89th6th123rd15th82nd154th66th240th95th125th72nd86th42nd213th305th329th
2018-1985th73rd40th5th294th40th272nd64th326th239th120th191st150th224th107th106th310th302nd
2017-1840th69th50th12th130th84th156th127th107th150th111th189th40th110th132nd169th214th222nd
2016-1712th164th1st12th45th48th26th143rd39th198th57th40th228th135th87th196th258th274th
2015-1616th101st51st52nd20th165th54th226th30th35th60th243rd87th109th195th246th50th88th
2014-152nd55th22nd159th1st90th11th331st1st19th9th39th254th125th95th335th20th115th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25103rd64th--227th119th252nd37th345th228th19th322nd141st14th85th243rd345th14th48th
2023-2469th72nd--297th49th221st30th303rd48th112th133rd200th133rd35th170th294th89th121st
2022-23236th135th--330th153rd246th109th271st159th194th253rd81st212th61st191st227th136th149th
2021-2275th6th--337th78th226th45th347th230th45th115th34th33rd67th156th340th20th72nd
2020-21236th3rd--357th96th313th228th336th226th258th24th118th312th249th155th263rd109th147th
2019-2085th1st--344th61st263rd168th345th115th47th98th17th135th213th171st336th17th62nd
2018-19121st7th--351st81st232nd60th337th301st156th51st3rd293rd202nd123rd322nd81st151st
2017-1874th9th--337th39th296th104th313th261st94th12th32nd158th104th224th288th48th81st
2016-1759th29th--270th64th147th34th301st100th163rd118th49th282nd175th99th283rd128th197th
2015-16137th20th--347th71st245th136th312th82nd241st62nd185th268th190th130th266th140th181st
2014-1592nd8th--339th100th161st34th331st151st234th145th23rd322nd327th85th285th147th213th