TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 Indiana  20-12 (0.625)  |  Big Ten
All-Play Percentage: 0.906 (34th)
Schedule Strength: 0.748 (14th)
Record Quality: 0.305 (41st)
Avg. Season Rank: 36.30 (30th)
Pace: 68.59 (238th)
Momentum: 2.59 (53rd)
Off. Momentum: 0.11 (218th)
Def. Momentum: 2.47 (27th)
Consistency: -9.49 (231st)
Res. Consistency: -12.83 (248th)
Away From Home: -3.07 (336th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.94 (342nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.78 32.13 67.74 82.47 46.01 26.17 34.89 25.18 36.63 31.12 62.96 11.29 17.47 7.47 31.73 30.53 37.73 1.94
RANK: 48th 6th 281st 147th 43rd 306th 90th 90th 191st 65th 54th 149th 13th 15th 312th 90th 81st 41st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 90.60 24.11 -- 80.22 40.43 29.31 31.47 22.40 33.22 28.50 55.32 10.20 12.88 4.84 36.54 27.93 35.53 2.01
RANK: 31st 121st -- 102nd 48th 116th 77th 180th 37th 176th 58th 102nd 164th 149th 136th 193rd 203rd 218th

ANALYSIS:
While this site doesn't quite consider them to be in the national title hunt, Indiana has the potential to be a formidable opponent for many in Division I. Ranked 34th overall (out of 353) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 20-12. They are also ranked by this site as the #12 team (out of 14) in the Big Ten (average ranking 36.9). With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.748 (which ranks 14th nationally), Indiana is one of the more battle-tested teams in the college game.

The primary strength for Indiana is defense. The team is ranked 31st in efficiency, allowing fewer than 91 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Indiana has been able to successfully prevent opponents from making shots between the three-point stripe and the low post. They're ranked 37th in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 33.2% of their attempts from that distance. Indiana also boasts one of the better overall defensive field goal percentages in the country. The team ranks #48 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO only makes good on about 40.4% of their total attempts from the floor.

Indiana plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 48th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 107 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Indiana does a super job in their efforts to get to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 32.13 vs. AO, they are ranked sixth in the nation at getting to the charity stripe. Unfortunately, they don't convert a ton of their free throws and make just 67.7% of their attempts. Indiana also appears to be one of the top-notch offensive rebounding teams you will find this year. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 17.47 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked 13th in the NCAA), and they convert 7.5% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 15th) as well.

On the road, Indiana performs noticeably worse than they do at home. The team is currently ranked 336th in the country in the away-from-home metric we track.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Indiana does better vs. clubs that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When playing squads that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 9.59, Indiana performs above average 80% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 29% of the time.
Indiana performs better against squads that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. When facing teams that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.17%, Indiana is more efficient than normal 68% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 20% of the time.
When playing teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively, Indiana usually performs better than average. Indiana is more efficient than normal 72% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 89.50. In all other contests, Indiana performs better than average 29% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Nebraska coach Fred Hoiberg diagnosed with influenza after being briefly hospitalized with illness
(3/12/2020 12:35:00 PM) Nebraska's entire basketball team went under quarantine in the locker room and its coach, Fred Hoiberg, was taken to the hospital Wednesday night after showing signs of illness during Nebraska's eventual 89-64 loss to Indiana.
Hoiberg: I wouldn’t have coached if it was risk to others
(3/12/2020 11:03:00 AM) Nebraska coach Fred Hoiberg, facing criticism for coaching his team when he was ... Hoiberg was taken to an Indianapolis hospital after he left Wednesday night’s 89-64 loss to Indiana in the Big Ten Tournament with about four minutes left. The team and staff were held in the locker room for about two hours after the game out of concern ...
Jackson-Davis helps lead Indiana past Nebraska 89-64
(3/12/2020 6:54:00 AM) Indiana freshman Trayce Jackson-Davis had a double double of 11 points and career-high 17 rebounds to help lead the Hoosiers to a 89-64 romp over Nebraska in the opening round of the Big Ten Tournament.
Indiana survives and advances against Minnesota
(3/4/2020 11:10:00 PM) BLOOMINGTON – Indiana did its best Bachman Turner Overdrive impression tonight: the Hoosiers took care of business. Indiana's 72-67 win over Minnesota was the type of result that won't help the Hoosiers much on Selection Sunday, but a loss tonight would have been devastating. Indiana needs two wins this week to likely lock up an NCAA ...
Hoosiers Sweep Gopher Men 72-67
(3/4/2020 10:26:00 PM) His hard work eventually paid off. The graduate transfer scored 12 points, grabbed eight rebounds and continually chased Daniel Oturu, leading the Indiana Hoosiers to a crucial 72-67 victory over Minnesota. “I thought the whole key to the game was Joey Brunk,” coach Archie Miller said. “His impact on the game on both ends of the floor ...
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2548th48th125th50thBig Ten131st41st14th268th334th57th
2023-2480th80th140th70thBig Ten160th125th19th118th182nd83rd
2022-2331st31st72nd29thBig Ten186th18th20th333rd329th25th
2021-2237th37th126th59thBig Ten197th115th34th307th285th22nd
2020-2159th59th215th100thBig Ten273rd242nd9th256th162nd38th
2019-2034th34th91st41stBig Ten238th231st14th342nd336th30th
2018-1952nd52nd148th69thBig Ten227th163rd36th340th282nd36th
2017-1869th69th171st100thBig Ten260th85th51st60th312th90th
2016-1744th44th164th87thBig Ten171st211th56th344th345th33rd
2015-1611th11th22nd17thBig Ten174th326th71st121st350th16th
2014-1557th57th120th67thBig Ten93rd9th57th281st275th52nd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2566th55th226th95th61st301st184th123rd153rd71st46th165th24th13th314th131st90th49th
2023-24106th35th329th300th21st346th191st137th61st57th39th272nd75th10th342nd119th40th14th
2022-2327th90th218th109th5th350th9th44th47th35th69th158th37th4th353rd44th39th10th
2021-2272nd19th215th247th37th320th134th172nd267th40th33rd177th75th27th314th163rd34th22nd
2020-2184th1st322nd276th52nd318th136th228th138th42nd111th204th148th159th298th211th24th23rd
2019-2048th6th281st147th43rd306th90th90th191st65th54th149th13th15th312th90th81st41st
2018-1969th81st304th70th63rd228th233rd279th266th7th72nd114th107th50th254th292nd10th24th
2017-1885th30th342nd154th62nd219th219th337th148th1st120th92nd43rd56th228th339th2nd18th
2016-1733rd118th114th186th21st111th32nd342nd58th4th94th196th11th3rd119th345th5th61st
2015-165th117th66th127th7th31st8th349th37th29th35th16th118th30th32nd350th31st203rd
2014-1512th217th104th22nd28th24th7th314th96th33rd131st149th70th36th44th327th76th219th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2535th45th--168th40th219th45th285th126th57th47th164th51st58th226th287th56th85th
2023-2487th132nd--308th16th337th89th255th40th64th27th216th338th182nd320th230th40th30th
2022-2354th103rd--313th14th249th95th209th23rd228th5th110th206th65th209th184th178th164th
2021-2231st143rd--163rd10th265th113th224th29th67th7th124th129th57th263rd221st68th60th
2020-2151st190th--170th25th176th78th244th44th124th19th111th193rd46th180th247th120th140th
2019-2031st121st--102nd48th116th77th180th37th176th58th102nd164th149th136th193rd203rd218th
2018-1937th55th--147th54th167th119th166th47th187th43rd55th135th130th167th155th199th199th
2017-1847th86th--99th99th128th150th74th122nd239th34th255th54th127th155th93rd261st247th
2016-1777th177th--133rd71st127th100th150th137th216th42nd270th94th49th131st171st227th231st
2015-1650th35th--173rd129th42nd97th171st163rd298th67th134th66th36th46th169th299th311th
2014-15187th118th--271st191st99th54th204th121st314th256th167th255th182nd60th169th292nd297th