TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 UIC  17-14 (0.548)  |  Missouri Valley
All-Play Percentage: 0.556 (162nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.561 (101st)
Record Quality: 0.103 (121st)
Avg. Season Rank: 158.66 (155th)
Pace: 68.05 (86th)
Momentum: -6.07 (352nd)
Off. Momentum: -6.23 (364th)
Def. Momentum: 0.16 (160th)
Consistency: -10.44 (303rd)
Res. Consistency: -14.34 (292nd)
Away From Home: 0.47 (90th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.67 (44th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.25 28.84 71.66 86.53 43.63 34.84 34.67 20.97 38.45 30.71 57.32 11.21 14.55 5.59 40.27 24.24 35.50 2.05
RANK: 162nd 114th 210th 209th 188th 142nd 142nd 202nd 135th 221st 230th 236th 184th 223rd 135th 196th 225th 237th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.55 25.24 -- 89.57 44.92 30.89 32.64 25.68 41.67 32.99 58.95 12.39 14.95 5.80 34.49 28.67 36.84 1.98
RANK: 180th 101st -- 288th 216th 63rd 93rd 334th 323rd 231st 184th 201st 208th 145th 39th 323rd 188th 282nd

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, UIC should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. Haslametrics has them ranked 162nd overall (out of 364) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 17-14. They are also ranked by this site as the #8 team (out of 12) in the MVC (average ranking 141.2).

UIC will likely rely on their offense more than anything else to win games. The team is ranked 162nd in offensive efficiency and scores more than 108 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Despite being fairly competent on offense, UIC is quite vanilla and doesn't really excel in one particular area on that end of the floor. In fact, they don't even qualify for the top-100 in any of the offensive categories we consider for this analysis.

UIC plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 180th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 109 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UIC owns a pretty good track record against teams that shoot the three. They rank 93rd in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 32.6% of their attempts from afar. For this reason, AO takes nowhere near as many threes as they typically would -- just 34.5% of AO's field goal attempts will be from downtown. If UIC does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's troubles stopping opponents from converting mid-range jumpers. AO will make good on 41.7% of their mid-range field goal attempts, and the squad ranks 42nd-worst in that category because of it.

UIC has definitely not been as efficient as of late compared to earlier in the season and, consequently, the team is nationally ranked 352nd in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter, UIC often performs better than normal. UIC is more efficient than usual 83% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.03. In their other contests, UIC performs better than the norm 18% of the time.
UIC does better vs. clubs that are typically efficient on offense. When playing squads that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 111.95, UIC performs above average 78% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 30% of the time.
UIC performs worse against squads that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. When facing teams that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.05%, UIC is more efficient than normal 21% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 67% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25162nd161st151st121stMVC86th303rd101st44th90th155th
2023-24193rd192nd296th236thMVC122nd259th111th59th52nd167th
2022-23295th293rd280th263rdMVC102nd187th235th339th231st301st
2021-22280th280th214th241stHorizon League53rd192nd297th29th54th268th
2020-21303rd303rd239th289thHorizon League167th56th296th70th308th245th
2019-20212th212th191st214thHorizon League88th314th270th219th40th279th
2018-19194th193rd183rd191stHorizon League75th152nd174th152nd313th192nd
2017-18185th185th152nd187thHorizon League23rd235th254th341st215th248th
2016-17236th236th206th218thHorizon League28th27th246th232nd171st219th
2015-16329th329th346th333rdHorizon League45th14th167th72nd213th342nd
2014-15273rd272nd312th295thHorizon League184th17th131st170th261st299th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25162nd114th210th209th188th142nd142nd202nd135th221st230th236th184th223rd135th196th225th237th
2023-24249th314th311th257th194th103rd98th258th291st230th163rd233rd272nd276th84th246th206th263rd
2022-23311th213th332nd325th300th56th231st256th97th347th290th201st256th225th29th229th328th345th
2021-22226th294th196th175th236th18th260th136th25th354th126th214th210th261st22nd134th356th356th
2020-21312th350th311th157th306th44th260th67th87th356th294th340th267th297th48th65th356th353rd
2019-20277th277th255th326th164th230th238th179th157th250th130th221st222nd119th191st138th203rd186th
2018-19231st295th258th257th185th48th176th334th279th150th183rd115th322nd348th33rd333rd126th259th
2017-18227th130th132nd290th199th265th196th234th133rd81st291st131st182nd238th234th228th55th69th
2016-17231st140th163rd307th234th190th117th296th265th100th313th291st62nd202nd153rd277th69th132nd
2015-16342nd72nd348th249th343rd344th326th52nd316th88th349th247th29th51st342nd44th74th19th
2014-15243rd91st46th83rd327th168th270th83rd290th239th324th208th148th282nd197th95th268th209th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25180th101st--288th216th63rd93rd334th323rd231st184th201st208th145th39th323rd188th282nd
2023-24151st269th--137th131st41st157th195th78th303rd90th209th272nd136th45th199th316th328th
2022-23250th254th--182nd256th32nd283rd288th351st270th65th154th324th280th33rd291st269th318th
2021-22313th277th--220th328th3rd356th348th330th237th149th198th320th284th3rd352nd218th335th
2020-21227th262nd--314th240th3rd45th357th325th58th202nd109th316th246th2nd357th29th291st
2019-20100th274th--156th88th220th10th191st200th107th185th177th244th122nd225th189th113th117th
2018-19155th349th--103rd104th49th83rd161st91st267th77th207th244th137th59th178th291st303rd
2017-18143rd272nd--289th95th42nd70th195th218th338th19th305th308th147th26th155th323rd332nd
2016-17236th174th--319th178th19th231st294th141st340th86th336th302nd304th6th252nd323rd341st
2015-16234th266th--271st148th111th200th179th183rd302nd60th339th328th252nd78th156th276th298th
2014-15292nd210th--132nd324th29th347th143rd318th316th178th176th184th284th30th163rd316th323rd