TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 UIC  17-19 (0.472)  |  Horizon
All-Play Percentage: 0.329 (236th)
Schedule Strength: 0.425 (246th)
Record Quality: -0.103 (218th)
Avg. Season Rank: 217.99 (219th)
Pace: 73.55 (28th)
Momentum: -0.58 (199th)
Off. Momentum: 0.80 (170th)
Def. Momentum: -1.39 (234th)
Consistency: -7.55 (27th)
Res. Consistency: -9.36 (54th)
Away From Home: -0.22 (171st)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.48 (232nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 97.66 28.16 70.71 78.75 42.62 29.13 36.46 19.84 34.57 29.78 54.01 8.71 16.75 6.31 36.99 25.19 37.82 1.99
RANK: 231st 140th 163rd 307th 234th 190th 117th 296th 265th 100th 313th 291st 62nd 202nd 153rd 277th 69th 132nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.57 27.74 -- 85.69 44.52 24.83 36.51 26.63 36.21 34.24 56.81 13.49 16.61 8.32 28.97 31.07 39.95 1.89
RANK: 236th 174th -- 319th 178th 19th 231st 294th 141st 340th 86th 336th 302nd 304th 6th 252nd 323rd 341st

ANALYSIS:
If you see UIC on the schedule, you will likely get one of the average to below-average teams in college hoops. They have a record of 17-19 and are ranked 236th overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 10 schools in the Horizon League (average ranking 200.2), they're currently ranked as our #6 team in the conference.

Defensively, UIC finds itself in the lower half of our ratings. The team is ranked 236th in defensive efficiency, giving up more than 105 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UIC struggles on occasion to deny opponents opportunities to shoot from the floor. The team is ranked 319th in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 85.69 vs. AO. UIC also gives up too many chances to easily score off of offensive rebounds. The team allows AO to convert 8.3% of all second-chance opportunities (304th nationally), and with a rating of 16.61, they're 302nd in potential points surrendered off of the offensive boards as well.

UIC doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 98 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #231 in the nation in offensive efficiency. UIC tends to be very careless with the ball and allows far too many breakaway opportunities off of their own turnovers. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 13.49, which ranks 336th in D1. UIC also won't provide opponents much of a scare with their shooting percentage from the inside. The team is ranked 313th in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 54.0% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO.

UIC is one of the more consistent teams in Division I (presently ranked 27th in consistency), so forecasting the outcomes of their future contests tends to be easier than the norm.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UIC performs worse against squads that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. When facing teams that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.37%, UIC is more efficient than normal 31% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 81% of the time.
When playing teams that effectively clean the offensive glass, UIC usually performs better than average. UIC is more efficient than normal 79% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 14.24. In all other contests, UIC performs better than average 40% of the time.
UIC is typically better vs. teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively. Against foes that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 102.95, UIC performs above their norm 83% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 50% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25161st161st151st122ndMVC85th303rd101st44th90th155th
2023-24193rd192nd296th236thMVC122nd259th111th59th52nd167th
2022-23295th293rd280th263rdMVC102nd187th235th339th231st301st
2021-22280th280th214th241stHorizon League53rd192nd297th29th54th268th
2020-21303rd303rd239th289thHorizon League167th56th296th70th308th245th
2019-20212th212th191st214thHorizon League88th314th270th219th40th279th
2018-19194th193rd183rd191stHorizon League75th152nd174th152nd313th192nd
2017-18185th185th152nd187thHorizon League23rd235th254th341st215th248th
2016-17236th236th206th218thHorizon League28th27th246th232nd171st219th
2015-16329th329th346th333rdHorizon League45th14th167th72nd213th342nd
2014-15273rd272nd312th295thHorizon League184th17th131st170th261st299th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25163rd115th210th209th187th141st140th200th131st222nd229th236th185th221st135th196th223rd237th
2023-24249th314th311th257th194th103rd98th258th291st230th163rd233rd272nd276th84th246th206th263rd
2022-23311th213th332nd325th300th56th231st256th97th347th290th201st256th225th29th229th328th345th
2021-22226th294th196th175th236th18th260th136th25th354th126th214th210th261st22nd134th356th356th
2020-21312th350th311th157th306th44th260th67th87th356th294th340th267th297th48th65th356th353rd
2019-20277th277th255th326th164th230th238th179th157th250th130th221st222nd119th191st138th203rd186th
2018-19231st295th258th257th185th48th176th334th279th150th183rd115th322nd348th33rd333rd126th259th
2017-18227th130th132nd290th199th265th196th234th133rd81st291st131st182nd238th234th228th55th69th
2016-17231st140th163rd307th234th190th117th296th265th100th313th291st62nd202nd153rd277th69th132nd
2015-16342nd72nd348th249th343rd344th326th52nd316th88th349th247th29th51st342nd44th74th19th
2014-15243rd91st46th83rd327th168th270th83rd290th239th324th208th148th282nd197th95th268th209th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25180th101st--287th217th63rd94th333rd323rd230th183rd200th209th146th39th322nd189th282nd
2023-24151st269th--137th131st41st157th195th78th303rd90th209th272nd136th45th199th316th328th
2022-23250th254th--182nd256th32nd283rd288th351st270th65th154th324th280th33rd291st269th318th
2021-22313th277th--220th328th3rd356th348th330th237th149th198th320th284th3rd352nd218th335th
2020-21227th262nd--314th240th3rd45th357th325th58th202nd109th316th246th2nd357th29th291st
2019-20100th274th--156th88th220th10th191st200th107th185th177th244th122nd225th189th113th117th
2018-19155th349th--103rd104th49th83rd161st91st267th77th207th244th137th59th178th291st303rd
2017-18143rd272nd--289th95th42nd70th195th218th338th19th305th308th147th26th155th323rd332nd
2016-17236th174th--319th178th19th231st294th141st340th86th336th302nd304th6th252nd323rd341st
2015-16234th266th--271st148th111th200th179th183rd302nd60th339th328th252nd78th156th276th298th
2014-15292nd210th--132nd324th29th347th143rd318th316th178th176th184th284th30th163rd316th323rd