TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 UIC  10-24 (0.294)  |  Horizon
All-Play Percentage: 0.223 (273rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.539 (131st)
Record Quality: -0.227 (295th)
Avg. Season Rank: 292.47 (299th)
Pace: 65.31 (184th)
Momentum: 2.02 (70th)
Off. Momentum: 0.57 (179th)
Def. Momentum: 1.44 (48th)
Consistency: -7.44 (17th)
Res. Consistency: -10.79 (118th)
Away From Home: -0.86 (261st)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.79 (170th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.63 30.92 74.01 83.99 38.49 28.27 32.18 28.59 32.26 27.14 51.62 10.72 15.65 5.56 33.66 34.03 32.31 2.01
RANK: 243rd 91st 46th 83rd 327th 168th 270th 83rd 290th 239th 324th 208th 148th 282nd 197th 95th 268th 209th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.88 30.03 -- 81.05 47.36 23.79 39.63 24.87 39.22 32.39 59.29 11.47 15.33 8.05 29.35 30.69 39.96 1.89
RANK: 292nd 210th -- 132nd 324th 29th 347th 143rd 318th 316th 178th 176th 184th 284th 30th 163rd 316th 323rd

ANALYSIS:
UIC presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. They are ranked #273 (out of 351) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 10-24. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of nine) in the Horizon League (average ranking 170.8).

UIC does not provide much of a challenge on defense. They are ranked at #292 in efficiency on that end of the court and give up about 107 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. UIC allows opposing teams far too many easy chances from the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four main defensive field goal shooting categories. They are at their worst when defending outside the paint, allowing AO to convert 39.6% of their three-pointers (fifth from the bottom in the nation), 39.2% of their mid-range chances (318th), and 47.4% of their total shots from the field (324th).

UIC doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 97 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #243 in the nation in offensive efficiency. UIC is among the worst of the worst when it comes to field goal shooting. The team is rated #327 in the country in field goal percentage, making good on a meager 38.5% of their attempts vs. AO. UIC also won't provide opponents much of a scare with their shooting percentage from the inside. The team is ranked 324th in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 51.6% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. If UIC does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's outstanding shooting at the charity stripe. The squad makes 74.0% of their free throw attempts, which ranks #46 in Division I.

UIC is one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked 17th in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UIC does better vs. clubs that allow more chances at the line. When playing squads that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 30.59, UIC performs above average 80% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 41% of the time.
UIC performs worse against squads that find ways to get to the free throw line. When facing teams that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 25.77, UIC is more efficient than normal 41% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 80% of the time.
When playing teams that convert well from the charity stripe, UIC usually performs better than average. UIC is more efficient than normal 68% of the time when facing clubs that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 68.64%. In all other contests, UIC performs better than average 31% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25161st161st152nd122ndMVC86th305th101st44th90th155th
2023-24193rd192nd296th236thMVC122nd259th111th59th52nd167th
2022-23295th293rd280th263rdMVC102nd187th235th339th231st301st
2021-22280th280th214th241stHorizon League53rd192nd297th29th54th268th
2020-21303rd303rd239th289thHorizon League167th56th296th70th308th245th
2019-20212th212th191st214thHorizon League88th314th270th219th40th279th
2018-19194th193rd183rd191stHorizon League75th152nd174th152nd313th192nd
2017-18185th185th152nd187thHorizon League23rd235th254th341st215th248th
2016-17236th236th206th218thHorizon League28th27th246th232nd171st219th
2015-16329th329th346th333rdHorizon League45th14th167th72nd213th342nd
2014-15273rd272nd312th295thHorizon League184th17th131st170th261st299th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25163rd115th210th208th186th142nd139th200th133rd221st228th237th183rd221st135th196th225th237th
2023-24249th314th311th257th194th103rd98th258th291st230th163rd233rd272nd276th84th246th206th263rd
2022-23311th213th332nd325th300th56th231st256th97th347th290th201st256th225th29th229th328th345th
2021-22226th294th196th175th236th18th260th136th25th354th126th214th210th261st22nd134th356th356th
2020-21312th350th311th157th306th44th260th67th87th356th294th340th267th297th48th65th356th353rd
2019-20277th277th255th326th164th230th238th179th157th250th130th221st222nd119th191st138th203rd186th
2018-19231st295th258th257th185th48th176th334th279th150th183rd115th322nd348th33rd333rd126th259th
2017-18227th130th132nd290th199th265th196th234th133rd81st291st131st182nd238th234th228th55th69th
2016-17231st140th163rd307th234th190th117th296th265th100th313th291st62nd202nd153rd277th69th132nd
2015-16342nd72nd348th249th343rd344th326th52nd316th88th349th247th29th51st342nd44th74th19th
2014-15243rd91st46th83rd327th168th270th83rd290th239th324th208th148th282nd197th95th268th209th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25180th101st--287th216th64th93rd333rd323rd230th183rd199th209th147th39th323rd188th281st
2023-24151st269th--137th131st41st157th195th78th303rd90th209th272nd136th45th199th316th328th
2022-23250th254th--182nd256th32nd283rd288th351st270th65th154th324th280th33rd291st269th318th
2021-22313th277th--220th328th3rd356th348th330th237th149th198th320th284th3rd352nd218th335th
2020-21227th262nd--314th240th3rd45th357th325th58th202nd109th316th246th2nd357th29th291st
2019-20100th274th--156th88th220th10th191st200th107th185th177th244th122nd225th189th113th117th
2018-19155th349th--103rd104th49th83rd161st91st267th77th207th244th137th59th178th291st303rd
2017-18143rd272nd--289th95th42nd70th195th218th338th19th305th308th147th26th155th323rd332nd
2016-17236th174th--319th178th19th231st294th141st340th86th336th302nd304th6th252nd323rd341st
2015-16234th266th--271st148th111th200th179th183rd302nd60th339th328th252nd78th156th276th298th
2014-15292nd210th--132nd324th29th347th143rd318th316th178th176th184th284th30th163rd316th323rd