TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 Bradley  13-20 (0.394)  |  Missouri Valley
All-Play Percentage: 0.343 (231st)
Schedule Strength: 0.580 (98th)
Record Quality: -0.088 (215th)
Avg. Season Rank: 254.39 (255th)
Pace: 70.00 (195th)
Momentum: 3.49 (33rd)
Off. Momentum: 3.09 (42nd)
Def. Momentum: 0.39 (101st)
Consistency: -11.10 (343rd)
Res. Consistency: -14.59 (327th)
Away From Home: -1.24 (274th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.64 (302nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 93.13 29.15 67.35 75.02 43.08 25.77 34.41 26.44 38.18 22.82 58.54 10.78 12.90 6.40 34.34 35.24 30.42 2.04
RANK: 308th 100th 281st 351st 213th 289th 204th 83rd 95th 333rd 198th 164th 261st 185th 225th 46th 308th 219th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.92 31.28 -- 79.66 42.59 31.08 35.15 26.21 36.42 22.37 60.15 13.71 13.74 4.89 39.02 32.90 28.08 2.11
RANK: 135th 308th -- 94th 92nd 246th 158th 279th 148th 11th 182nd 337th 127th 26th 288th 303rd 15th 25th

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but Bradley should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. Their record this season is 13-20, and the club is ranked 231st overall (out of 351) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. Of the 10 schools in the MVC (average ranking 149.7), they're currently ranked as our #9 team in the conference.

Bradley will likely call on their defense to win a majority of their games. The team is ranked 135th in defensive efficiency and allows fewer than 101 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Bradley is one of the better teams when it comes to not allowing opponents to convert scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.9% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 26th in the NCAA). If Bradley does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's tendency to send opponents to the line too much by fouling. The squad has a rating of 31.28 in defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks 44th-worst in the country.

Unfortunately, Bradley is not even remotely close to being as good on offense as they are on defense. The team is ranked 308th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 93 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Bradley happens to be one of the very worst in the game when it comes to maximizing the number of shot attempts they get off from the floor. The team is nationally ranked last in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 75.02 vs. AO. Bradley also tends to be very careless with the ball and allows far too many breakaway opportunities off of their own turnovers. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 13.71, which ranks 337th in D1.

Bradley has been playing better basketball in their most recent outings, as evidenced by the team's #33 ranking in positive momentum. Bradley has also been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked ninth from the bottom overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint, Bradley often performs better than normal. Bradley is more efficient than usual 92% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 61.74%. In their other contests, Bradley performs better than the norm 30% of the time.
Bradley does better vs. clubs that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.92%, Bradley performs above average 71% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 18% of the time.
Bradley performs better against squads that prefer the outside shot. When facing teams that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.03, Bradley is more efficient than normal 75% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 31% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2590th90th25th40thMVC261st192nd104th222nd187th89th
2023-2462nd62nd72nd72ndMVC251st169th98th152nd251st88th
2022-2387th87th45th79thMVC273rd214th173rd354th363rd74th
2021-2289th88th161st128thMVC123rd253rd112th155th267th119th
2020-21172nd172nd227th215thMVC257th165th120th77th221st133rd
2019-20114th113th67th91stMVC216th27th174th239th322nd115th
2018-19139th138th129th144thMVC296th277th176th24th35th150th
2017-18132nd132nd109th107thMVC268th106th129th295th338th133rd
2016-17231st231st261st215thMVC195th343rd98th302nd274th255th
2015-16325th325th348th313thMVC163rd349th96th137th193rd338th
2014-15243rd243rd325th296thMVC295th19th130th14th215th247th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2592nd256th109th286th65th95th13th148th59th349th60th188th320th281st76th127th348th341st
2023-2484th313th96th157th45th54th66th92nd9th352nd22nd141st320th296th59th93rd353rd351st
2022-23128th309th323rd59th100th75th187th55th6th336th109th239th157th144th109th75th353rd331st
2021-22141st216th267th143rd133rd69th157th237th27th243rd161st155th41st125th75th245th250th296th
2020-21168th311th142nd59th175th124th279th14th54th351st45th310th141st95th157th18th352nd326th
2019-20122nd142nd120th74th168th287th38th6th146th315th173rd227th83rd81st303rd11th317th182nd
2018-19189th74th202nd246th203rd256th45th24th167th339th213th309th240th258th240th16th330th244th
2017-18188th58th190th280th186th289th82nd24th117th338th183rd217th144th172nd272nd16th332nd227th
2016-17308th100th281st351st213th289th204th83rd95th333rd198th164th261st185th225th46th308th219th
2015-16348th217th240th351st316th257th338th94th162nd346th225th348th198th233rd167th40th339th293rd
2014-15317th160th247th134th339th148th340th12th191st346th295th111th207th309th158th15th346th321st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2598th228th--265th42nd301st46th329th151st28th70th231st272nd186th280th316th17th35th
2023-2448th227th--113th34th163rd113th268th61st82nd35th201st284th231st177th284th96th120th
2022-2376th209th--127th53rd115th87th327th186th48th38th170th138th55th117th337th46th124th
2021-2242nd178th--108th49th58th49th341st311th22nd10th218th132nd90th76th351st25th127th
2020-21161st194th--186th117th310th299th326th152nd5th174th131st253rd298th311th325th4th10th
2019-20135th213th--243rd38th324th107th334th152nd4th154th121st151st114th315th330th3rd7th
2018-1988th209th--258th32nd273rd34th335th212th21st49th186th140th63rd251st332nd9th22nd
2017-1899th237th--127th40th320th59th273rd102nd6th215th138th251st150th326th284th6th5th
2016-17135th308th--94th92nd246th158th279th148th11th182nd337th127th26th288th303rd15th25th
2015-16186th347th--24th218th50th254th295th196th11th306th337th59th160th114th328th32nd111th
2014-15106th238th--18th139th254th229th231st180th1st273rd284th80th26th313th300th4th7th