TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 Boise State  25-9 (0.735)  |  Mountain West
All-Play Percentage: 0.886 (41st)
Schedule Strength: 0.556 (120th)
Record Quality: 0.288 (45th)
Avg. Season Rank: 63.04 (57th)
Pace: 63.63 (290th)
Momentum: 1.87 (77th)
Off. Momentum: 0.59 (177th)
Def. Momentum: 1.29 (54th)
Consistency: -9.23 (184th)
Res. Consistency: -10.03 (65th)
Away From Home: -1.62 (312th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.26 (213th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.17 27.50 72.95 83.82 44.96 33.74 37.75 22.42 34.94 27.66 61.87 10.99 13.29 6.84 40.26 26.74 33.00 2.07
RANK: 45th 225th 60th 95th 84th 26th 41st 275th 187th 212th 76th 192nd 270th 158th 36th 296th 247th 309th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 94.43 23.57 -- 82.84 41.57 28.32 31.42 28.65 34.02 25.87 61.04 8.50 12.64 4.75 34.19 34.59 31.23 2.03
RANK: 60th 21st -- 201st 98th 188th 35th 298th 104th 82nd 241st 13th 27th 14th 178th 301st 66th 101st

ANALYSIS:
Boise State has a fairly solid squad that likely falls within the top quartile of all teams in college basketball this year. They are ranked #41 (out of 351) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 25-9. Of the 11 schools in the MWC (average ranking 148.5), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference.

Boise State succeeds primarily through their offense. They are ranked 45th in offensive efficiency and score in excess of 108 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Boise State allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 8.50, which ranks #13 in the country. Boise State will also make a concerted effort to fire off quite a few three-pointers each game. The team ranks 36th in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. If you do allow them to shoot from long, they have the ability to punish you for it, too. Ranked in the top-50 in three-point shooting percentage, they make approximately 37.8% of their three-point attempts vs. AO.

Boise State plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 60th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 94 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Boise State does a fantastic job to prevent opposing teams from capitalizing on chances from offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.7% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 14th in the NCAA), and with a rating of 12.64, they're 27th in potential points allowed off of the offensive glass as well. Boise State is also a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 23.57 vs. AO, they are currently rated 21st in the country in that category.

When playing on the road, Boise State performs somewhat worse than they normally do on their home court. The club is nationally ranked 312th in our site's away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Boise State does worse vs. clubs that prefer the outside shot. When playing squads that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.01, Boise State performs above average 18% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 67% of the time.
Boise State performs worse against squads that are typically efficient on offense. When facing teams that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 101.33, Boise State is more efficient than normal 27% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 71% of the time.
When playing teams that do not defend well on the perimeter, Boise State usually performs worse than average. Boise State is more efficient than normal 36% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 32.71%. In all other contests, Boise State performs better than average 80% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2551st51st40th41stMWC292nd286th82nd294th349th53rd
2023-2441st41st65th52ndMWC270th286th70th357th327th51st
2022-2355th55th50th23rdMWC267th324th57th165th292nd46th
2021-2243rd43rd21st18thMWC332nd121st71st108th20th37th
2020-2169th69th65th65thMWC156th258th125th109th150th69th
2019-20100th100th91st79thMWC131st269th90th349th330th116th
2018-19107th106th262nd225thMWC297th142nd145th270th216th125th
2017-1844th42nd39th41stMWC126th328th91st244th330th34th
2016-1784th83rd85th68thMWC123rd85th85th260th77th81st
2015-1685th84th98th87thMWC114th70th98th13th167th88th
2014-1541st41st32nd45thMWC290th184th120th213th312th57th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2528th31st18th148th54th92nd248th300th126th97th11th258th176th105th102nd306th106th190th
2023-2443rd46th104th84th96th98th119th275th97th71st144th199th131st81st117th290th97th172nd
2022-2352nd156th75th103rd63rd146th61st117th250th232nd17th221st183rd164th173rd131st254th232nd
2021-2275th25th348th213th64th168th31st163rd272nd223rd28th238th96th50th164th164th216th212th
2020-2187th80th163rd171st82nd190th140th127th127th221st58th104th230th198th197th123rd218th196th
2019-20119th75th81st256th140th139th158th238th253rd221st56th320th243rd229th103rd223rd192nd240th
2018-1986th112th107th294th32nd224th76th141st39th247th31st137th257th155th189th118th221st194th
2017-1869th175th61st157th78th89th50th165th43rd271st115th145th104th79th89th173rd272nd280th
2016-1780th26th146th301st79th139th103rd280th48th208th112th197th300th189th100th268th164th221st
2015-1680th50th144th279th56th80th241st323rd278th137th7th78th225th64th64th316th112th241st
2014-1545th225th60th95th84th26th41st275th187th212th76th192nd270th158th36th296th247th309th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2569th90th--73rd116th139th260th270th44th51st194th12th2nd16th184th300th74th113th
2023-2440th98th--96th67th176th16th238th18th92nd261st47th23rd28th199th248th109th124th
2022-2349th23rd--253rd61st233rd51st284th49th109th169th36th57th132nd207th273rd68th103rd
2021-2227th13th--165th88th64th56th328th92nd80th169th15th47th87th69th337th77th193rd
2020-2179th27th--113th174th63rd170th334th218th42nd249th24th7th180th74th339th57th156th
2019-2095th59th--97th194th217th16th247th279th30th339th171st23rd8th249th264th38th45th
2018-19160th80th--129th196th223rd170th306th173rd33rd337th15th2nd10th239th314th30th43rd
2017-1829th31st--112th90th87th69th327th72nd30th241st126th1st1st103rd336th37th106th
2016-17114th236th--182nd83rd51st89th338th45th71st207th121st259th197th49th339th68th193rd
2015-16102nd96th--61st180th182nd162nd248th204th26th275th99th32nd96th233rd283rd44th62nd
2014-1560th21st--201st98th188th35th298th104th82nd241st13th27th14th178th301st66th101st