TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Hawaii  20-14 (0.588)  |  Big West
All-Play Percentage: 0.548 (164th)
Schedule Strength: 0.385 (225th)
Record Quality: 0.022 (163rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 152.23 (151st)
Pace: 65.80 (310th)
Momentum: 0.38 (156th)
Off. Momentum: 0.22 (183rd)
Def. Momentum: 0.16 (134th)
Consistency: -8.92 (157th)
Res. Consistency: -10.30 (51st)
Away From Home: 0.75 (92nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.17 (282nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.99 28.41 72.60 82.33 45.03 33.24 33.74 18.34 40.74 30.74 59.80 7.01 11.94 5.87 40.38 22.27 37.34 2.03
RANK: 162nd 99th 158th 318th 129th 125th 205th 314th 110th 183rd 106th 353rd 245th 139th 83rd 296th 129th 220th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.62 26.47 -- 86.57 44.90 25.67 33.06 27.65 37.60 33.24 60.12 11.29 12.08 5.19 29.66 31.94 38.40 1.91
RANK: 175th 198th -- 239th 217th 7th 114th 335th 119th 284th 268th 168th 73rd 138th 4th 330th 266th 343rd

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, Hawaii should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. Their record this season is 20-14, and the club is ranked 164th overall (out of 362) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. Of the 11 schools in the Big West (average ranking 193.5), they're currently ranked as our #5 team in the conference.

If there is a strength for Hawaii this year, it's probably on the offensive end of the court. The team is rated 162nd in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 105 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Hawaii will likely shoot a fair share of three-pointers each contest. The team ranks 83rd in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. When it comes to actually making their three-point attempts, the squad shoots a so-so 33.7% from beyond the arc vs. AO. If Hawaii does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties in getting off a sufficient number of shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of just 82.33 vs. AO, which ranks 45th-worst in college basketball.

Hawaii plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 175th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 106 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Hawaii does a fairly satisfactory job to deny opponents chances to score off of the offensive glass. They have a rating of 12.08 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked 73rd in the country). If Hawaii does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's unwillingness to take risks in order to score fast points off of the opposition's turnovers. The squad only has a rating of 7.01 in potential points scored off of steals vs. AO, which ranks tenth-worst in the college game.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, Hawaii often performs worse than normal. Hawaii is more efficient than usual 25% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 57.59%. In their other contests, Hawaii performs better than the norm 75% of the time.
Hawaii does worse vs. clubs that shoot the ball well from the field. When playing squads that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.23%, Hawaii performs above average 32% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 77% of the time.
Hawaii performs worse against squads that are typically efficient on offense. When facing teams that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 103.79, Hawaii is more efficient than normal 25% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 65% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25227th225th213th208thBig West293rd17th162nd256th298th174th
2023-24164th164th129th163rdBig West310th157th225th282nd92nd151st
2022-23135th135th63rd109thBig West329th72nd232nd142nd54th113th
2021-22156th156th122nd160thBig West329th33rd256th260th211th157th
2020-21167th166th166th188thBig West319th225th177th118th94th172nd
2019-20184th182nd142nd188thBig West245th208th246th245th291st137th
2018-19200th200th125th177thBig West242nd203rd277th117th214th188th
2017-18196th196th140th170thBig West222nd37th228th24th46th191st
2016-17274th274th217th250thBig West247th233rd310th306th241st278th
2015-1660th60th8th37thBig West62nd89th184th18th70th62nd
2014-15109th109th92nd108thBig West8th27th170th151st295th133rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25235th111th72nd347th153rd320th327th247th224th86th121st363rd210th168th280th221st36th43rd
2023-24162nd99th158th318th129th125th205th314th110th183rd106th353rd245th139th83rd296th129th220th
2022-23192nd162nd77th127th267th178th265th162nd143rd153rd289th330th123rd112th202nd172nd188th164th
2021-22183rd130th84th266th209th112th146th266th242nd229th188th339th114th89th92nd255th197th255th
2020-21167th281st116th123rd186th119th129th197th38th190th303rd317th184th136th127th200th200th237th
2019-20220th201st113th137th255th150th301st197th300th146th168th223rd215th299th152nd209th155th184th
2018-19199th250th232nd234th177th72nd182nd211th143rd301st99th341st175th220th62nd205th286th311th
2017-18260th89th269th347th192nd215th261st113th241st335th33rd277th296th293rd144th76th309th274th
2016-17296th253rd132nd250th292nd112th321st178th305th294th124th339th157th259th97th159th281st279th
2015-16109th39th217th306th45th179th227th220th33rd262nd25th52nd235th93rd139th191st210th217th
2014-15147th194th158th185th109th210th223rd54th32nd322nd49th8th114th100th201st38th324th252nd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25248th203rd--339th145th106th239th347th123rd199th141st325th59th20th49th339th129th240th
2023-24175th198th--239th217th7th114th335th119th284th268th168th73rd138th4th330th266th343rd
2022-23103rd95th--332nd69th18th63rd352nd116th289th47th87th93rd201st7th343rd241st339th
2021-22157th171st--309th115th65th87th275th37th321st114th103rd120th64th36th229th304th321st
2020-21172nd116th--279th177th97th121st188th18th322nd278th313th98th205th62nd165th305th321st
2019-20142nd167th--103rd253rd12th198th235th305th287th93rd212th41st169th13th255th322nd336th
2018-19194th157th--161st228th122nd248th328th271st62nd264th231st141st220th117th331st50th128th
2017-18132nd280th--53rd149th137th54th320th326th7th260th234th188th210th203rd338th11th36th
2016-17204th261st--71st278th111th182nd336th327th6th348th328th59th286th151st345th10th51st
2015-1638th254th--43rd48th80th2nd294th117th17th220th128th143rd95th145th320th33rd97th
2014-15102nd291st--20th103rd171st200th185th124th21st137th57th237th195th259th251st46th56th