Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 Georgia18-15 (0.545) | SEC
All-Play Percentage: 0.843 (57th)
Schedule Strength: 0.752 (15th)
Record Quality: 0.242 (64th)
Avg. Season Rank: 68.60 (65th)
Pace: 66.62 (336th)
Momentum: 2.91 (49th)
Off. Momentum: 1.40 (110th)
Def. Momentum: 1.51 (65th)
Consistency: -8.31 (89th)
Res. Consistency: -13.34 (280th)
Away From Home: -1.01 (240th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 3.00 (2nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
106.22
66.63
30.80
70.81
83.83
37.18
44.35
29.54
10.05
34.04
30.06
11.75
39.08
24.24
15.38
63.44
7.09
19.89
9.27
35.23
35.86
28.91
2.06
RANK:
95th
336th
25th
210th
81st
120th
161st
204th
234th
235th
22nd
15th
87th
317th
262nd
66th
339th
12th
24th
233rd
24th
327th
243rd
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
93.07
66.60
21.18
--
87.94
33.33
37.91
32.92
10.76
32.69
29.06
8.61
29.63
25.96
13.96
53.79
9.80
14.07
4.38
37.43
33.04
29.52
2.08
RANK:
22nd
17th
22nd
--
346th
37th
5th
278th
169th
42nd
336th
201st
2nd
79th
34th
29th
81st
130th
8th
174th
321st
36th
84th
ANALYSIS: Despite what their win percentage might indicate, Georgia is a good team that can cause more than enough trouble for most opponents. Haslametrics has them ranked 57th overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 18-15. They are also ranked by this site as the #8 team (out of 14) in the SEC (average ranking 49.5). Sporting a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.752 (the 15th-highest in the country), Georgia has prepared themselves by challenging some of the best teams in the college game.
Georgia will suffocate most opponents with its stifling defense. Allowing roughly 93 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO and exhibiting a preference for a more deliberate, half-court style of play (the 16th-slowest pace in D1), this squad is rated #22 in defensive efficiency. Georgia will put a good dent in the shooting percentages of several opponents, considering the team ranks in the top-50 in each of the four major defensive shooting categories. Though they're most successful defending the mid-range jumper (allowing 29.6% shooting in that category vs. AO, second in the country), the team also hassles AO into converting just 32.7% of their three-pointers (42nd), 53.8% of their near-proximity chances (29th), and 37.9% of their total shots from the field (fifth). Georgia also does a fantastic job to prevent opposing teams from capitalizing on chances from offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.4% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked eighth in the NCAA). Georgia is lastly a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 21.18 vs. AO, they are currently rated 22nd in the country in that category. If Georgia does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's propensity to allow too many shot attempts per trip. The squad has a rating of 87.94 in defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks sixth-worst in college basketball.
Georgia is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 95th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 106 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Georgia appears to be one of the top-notch offensive rebounding teams you will find this year. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 19.89 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked 12th in the NCAA), and they convert 9.3% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 24th) as well. Georgia also loves taking the mid-range two, far more so than most other teams. The club is ranked 24th in ratio of mid-range attempts to total field goal attempts. If you do allow them to take that in-between shot, they can certainly make it, too. Currently rated in the top-100 in mid-range shooting percentage, they make roughly 39.1% of their attempts from that distance vs. AO. Georgia lastly does a super job in their efforts to get to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 30.80 vs. AO, they are ranked 25th in the nation at getting to the charity stripe, where the team shoots a rather mediocre 70.8%.
Georgia has been playing better basketball in their most recent outings, as evidenced by the team's #49 ranking in positive momentum.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Georgia is typically better vs. teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.63, Georgia performs above their norm 65% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 20% of the time.
When facing teams that are typically efficient on offense, Georgia often performs better than normal. Georgia is more efficient than usual 77% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 111.41. In their other contests, Georgia performs better than the norm 35% of the time.
Georgia does worse vs. clubs that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When playing squads that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 55.15%, Georgia performs above average 39% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 80% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.