TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 Georgia  18-15 (0.545)  |  SEC
All-Play Percentage: 0.843 (57th)
Schedule Strength: 0.752 (15th)
Record Quality: 0.242 (64th)
Avg. Season Rank: 68.60 (65th)
Pace: 66.62 (336th)
Momentum: 2.91 (49th)
Off. Momentum: 1.40 (110th)
Def. Momentum: 1.51 (65th)
Consistency: -8.31 (89th)
Res. Consistency: -13.34 (280th)
Away From Home: -1.01 (240th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 3.00 (2nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.22 30.80 70.81 83.83 44.35 29.54 34.04 30.06 39.08 24.24 63.44 7.09 19.89 9.27 35.23 35.86 28.91 2.06
RANK: 95th 25th 210th 81st 161st 204th 235th 22nd 87th 317th 66th 339th 12th 24th 233rd 24th 327th 243rd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 93.07 21.18 -- 87.94 37.91 32.92 32.69 29.06 29.63 25.96 53.79 9.80 14.07 4.38 37.43 33.04 29.52 2.08
RANK: 22nd 22nd -- 346th 5th 278th 42nd 336th 2nd 79th 29th 81st 130th 8th 174th 321st 36th 84th

ANALYSIS:
Despite what their win percentage might indicate, Georgia is a good team that can cause more than enough trouble for most opponents. Haslametrics has them ranked 57th overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 18-15. They are also ranked by this site as the #8 team (out of 14) in the SEC (average ranking 49.5). Sporting a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.752 (the 15th-highest in the country), Georgia has prepared themselves by challenging some of the best teams in the college game.

Georgia will suffocate most opponents with its stifling defense. Allowing roughly 93 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO and exhibiting a preference for a more deliberate, half-court style of play (the 16th-slowest pace in D1), this squad is rated #22 in defensive efficiency. Georgia will put a good dent in the shooting percentages of several opponents, considering the team ranks in the top-50 in each of the four major defensive shooting categories. Though they're most successful defending the mid-range jumper (allowing 29.6% shooting in that category vs. AO, second in the country), the team also hassles AO into converting just 32.7% of their three-pointers (42nd), 53.8% of their near-proximity chances (29th), and 37.9% of their total shots from the field (fifth). Georgia also does a fantastic job to prevent opposing teams from capitalizing on chances from offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.4% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked eighth in the NCAA). Georgia is lastly a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 21.18 vs. AO, they are currently rated 22nd in the country in that category. If Georgia does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's propensity to allow too many shot attempts per trip. The squad has a rating of 87.94 in defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks sixth-worst in college basketball.

Georgia is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 95th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 106 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Georgia appears to be one of the top-notch offensive rebounding teams you will find this year. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 19.89 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked 12th in the NCAA), and they convert 9.3% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 24th) as well. Georgia also loves taking the mid-range two, far more so than most other teams. The club is ranked 24th in ratio of mid-range attempts to total field goal attempts. If you do allow them to take that in-between shot, they can certainly make it, too. Currently rated in the top-100 in mid-range shooting percentage, they make roughly 39.1% of their attempts from that distance vs. AO. Georgia lastly does a super job in their efforts to get to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 30.80 vs. AO, they are ranked 25th in the nation at getting to the charity stripe, where the team shoots a rather mediocre 70.8%.

Georgia has been playing better basketball in their most recent outings, as evidenced by the team's #49 ranking in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Georgia is typically better vs. teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.63, Georgia performs above their norm 65% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 20% of the time.
When facing teams that are typically efficient on offense, Georgia often performs better than normal. Georgia is more efficient than usual 77% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 111.41. In their other contests, Georgia performs better than the norm 35% of the time.
Georgia does worse vs. clubs that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When playing squads that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 55.15%, Georgia performs above average 39% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 80% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2542nd42nd113th60thSEC253rd89th50th342nd357th37th
2023-2475th75th172nd85thSEC71st6th29th226th122nd86th
2022-23194th194th193rd138thSEC146th311th95th276th332nd134th
2021-22208th207th347th264thSEC100th49th52nd50th254th179th
2020-2193rd93rd156th89thSEC21st227th67th63rd253rd89th
2019-2093rd93rd192nd103rdSEC87th256th39th258th293rd100th
2018-19114th114th289th181stSEC118th218th43rd279th293rd132nd
2017-1857th56th155th64thSEC336th89th15th2nd240th65th
2016-1757th57th143rd62ndSEC250th202nd14th65th6th50th
2015-1671st70th124th67thSEC254th222nd37th149th248th81st
2014-1534th34th83rd37thSEC187th20th18th54th90th40th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2543rd13th193rd212th34th208th77th197th91st156th25th115th56th5th196th190th146th145th
2023-2495th116th187th127th139th87th100th317th255th67th165th109th177th201st96th324th80th178th
2022-23200th8th106th314th293rd188th286th243rd281st225th246th143rd36th149th139th213th190th202nd
2021-22113th35th90th328th62nd283rd177th259th226th87th53rd209th176th137th246th225th53rd60th
2020-2177th86th245th162nd39th302nd96th281st246th4th95th5th56th23rd302nd289th7th9th
2019-2059th178th210th92nd32nd146th259th273rd231st43rd9th82nd186th88th165th284th61st106th
2018-19125th16th171st313th78th280th177th198th329th173rd13th149th49th21st237th166th115th102nd
2017-1895th25th210th81st161st204th235th22nd87th317th66th339th12th24th233rd24th327th243rd
2016-1779th27th27th226th91st338th174th35th98th207th73rd189th249th234th334th29th194th51st
2015-1698th15th93rd182nd139th279th56th35th126th289th144th266th219th271st279th29th281st149th
2014-1572nd8th192nd276th66th288th79th168th262nd112th50th293rd83rd85th271st150th72nd71st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2548th68th--282nd24th234th81st277th46th145th18th127th258th55th186th253rd113th132nd
2023-2465th32nd--263rd60th217th65th227th38th186th98th117th126th151st182nd210th161st167th
2022-23182nd144th--247th175th200th112th267th298th162nd174th163rd312th142nd172nd250th127th158th
2021-22289th27th--283rd310th333rd283rd220th253rd72nd354th294th171st316th314th175th44th38th
2020-21118th110th--112th175th185th155th266th252nd43rd237th257th217th135th225th287th60th81st
2019-20127th63rd--257th175th131st110th291st174th184th249th147th50th52nd92nd267th145th209th
2018-19109th114th--316th75th132nd64th309th120th223rd72nd311th326th259th75th290th158th230th
2017-1822nd22nd--346th5th278th42nd336th2nd79th29th81st130th8th174th321st36th84th
2016-1744th74th--246th23rd244th68th303rd39th54th40th119th13th29th226th293rd46th66th
2015-1659th239th--223rd8th321st101st235th43rd38th3rd72nd45th14th314th231st22nd23rd
2014-1525th83rd--261st8th291st36th332nd45th18th14th63rd58th10th271st327th11th26th