TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
2024-25      2023-24      2022-23      2021-22
2020-21      2019-20      2018-19      2017-18
2016-17      2015-16      2014-15     
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
2024-25      2023-24      2022-23      2021-22
2020-21      2019-20      2018-19      2017-18
2016-17      2015-16      2014-15     
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Florida  35-4 (0.897)  |  SEC
All-Play Percentage: 0.994 (3rd)
 Schedule Strength: 0.747 (22nd)
 Record Quality: 0.652 (2nd)
 Avg. Season Rank: 9.81 (6th)
Pace: 69.09 (44th)
 Momentum: -0.31 (191st)
 Off. Momentum: 2.08 (78th)
 Def. Momentum: -2.39 (293rd)
Consistency: -9.30 (164th)
 Res. Consistency: -12.65 (190th)
 Away From Home: -0.71 (224th)
 Paper Tiger Factor: 2.23 (8th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 129.72 33.50 72.76 89.84 50.07 39.54 38.90 15.66 38.20 34.65 68.18 14.57 17.93 7.98 44.01 17.43 38.57 2.05
RANK: 2nd 11th 164th 64th 7th 40th 13th 322nd 145th 80th 4th 55th 42nd 32nd 56th 330th 123rd 244th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 91.98 24.42 -- 87.58 37.39 31.96 28.15 24.10 32.47 31.52 50.51 10.52 14.20 4.29 36.49 27.51 35.99 2.00
RANK: 7th 80th -- 204th 6th 106th 4th 296th 31st 158th 9th 59th 150th 23rd 91st 295th 151st 213th

ANALYSIS:
When you talk about the elite teams in college basketball this year, Florida most definitely is in the conversation. Ranked third overall (out of 364) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 35-4. Of the 16 schools in the SEC (average ranking 32.0), they're currently ranked as the best team in the conference. With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.747 (which ranks 22nd nationally), Florida is one of the more battle-tested teams in the college game.

Florida showcases one of the country's most efficient offenses. Racking up about 130 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, the team is nationally rated second in efficiency on that end of the floor. Florida is a very dangerous team when it comes to shooting the rock, ranking in the top-25 in three of our four major field goal categories. They convert 38.9% of their three-pointers (13th in the nation), 68.2% of their near-proximity attempts (fourth), and 50.1% of their total shots from the field (seventh) vs. AO. Florida also does a super job in their efforts to get to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 33.50 vs. AO, they are ranked 11th in the nation at getting to the charity stripe, where the team shoots a rather mediocre 72.8%.

The frightening part is that Florida is nearly as dominant on the defensive end of the floor as they are on the offensive side of things. The team ranks seventh nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 92 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Florida will put a good dent in the shooting percentages of several opponents, considering the team ranks in the top-50 in each of the four major defensive shooting categories. Defending the long-ball is their strength (allowing 28.1% shooting from three vs. AO, fourth-best in the nation), but the team also harasses AO into converting just 50.5% of their near-proximity attempts (ninth), 32.5% of their mid-range chances (31st), and 37.4% of their total shots from the field (sixth). Florida also does a fantastic job to prevent opposing teams from capitalizing on chances from offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.3% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 23rd in the NCAA).
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that favor a faster tempo, Florida usually performs better than average. Florida is more efficient than normal 61% of the time when facing clubs that have a pace vs. AO greater than 66.69. In all other contests, Florida performs better than average 25% of the time.
Florida is typically better vs. teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. Against foes that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 39.68%, Florida performs above their norm 67% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 33% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-253rd3rd1st2ndSEC44th164th22nd8th224th6th
2023-2429th29th65th31stSEC16th104th30th11th325th44th
2022-2377th77th207th126thSEC97th259th34th361st319th42nd
2021-2255th55th135th78thSEC260th180th65th270th207th34th
2020-2144th44th112th37thSEC204th100th21st252nd176th31st
2019-2027th27th102nd45thSEC329th216th23rd284th202nd45th
2018-1929th29th136th59thSEC347th154th13th319th119th25th
2017-1816th16th98th33rdSEC270th305th19th12th5th15th
2016-174th4th29th9thSEC168th217th1st339th157th9th
2015-1645th45th128th61stSEC106th141st15th317th142nd32nd
2014-1527th27th190th83rdSEC273rd164th5th306th310th21st
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-252nd11th164th64th7th40th13th322nd145th80th4th55th42nd32nd56th330th123rd244th
2023-2419th14th220th46th42nd228th25th170th109th40th97th77th38th47th265th192nd66th71st
2022-23121st72nd152nd189th121st206th220th271st223rd66th111th85th233rd93rd210th271st60th97th
2021-2249th49th131st83rd104th38th282nd271st56th210th25th61st83rd26th49th285th240th309th
2020-2147th88th54th230th21st294th72nd114th41st147th27th114th202nd119th282nd102nd125th83rd
2019-2023rd145th108th86th17th153rd33rd139th108th165th11th259th148th176th175th160th190th189th
2018-1965th164th128th76th105th59th183rd186th83rd224th33rd70th126th235th78th198th255th282nd
2017-1827th151st153rd9th82nd60th40th148th150th139th93rd21st166th117th112th201st209th240th
2016-1715th35th85th37th34th126th56th203rd137th58th33rd14th189th76th169th230th102nd155th
2015-1679th27th325th70th117th119th260th214th272nd78th43rd17th83rd112th149th237th123rd158th
2014-1583rd230th333rd147th35th86th155th315th64th37th46th102nd155th87th96th318th51st141st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-257th80th--204th6th106th4th296th31st158th9th59th150th23rd91st295th151st213th
2023-2472nd220th--164th91st19th32nd281st237th270th42nd40th45th45th21st296th267th326th
2022-2340th67th--278th49th13th43rd348th126th252nd25th164th86th38th9th346th224th329th
2021-2264th78th--55th147th93rd153rd184th164th143rd125th156th43rd88th138th224th186th216th
2020-2145th158th--156th51st157th8th118th111th243rd86th126th54th1st158th120th248th235th
2019-2053rd74th--138th62nd109th156th282nd70th97th60th97th4th61st113th292nd101st173rd
2018-1915th66th--109th24th115th23rd208th86th141st25th135th152nd15th146th234th164th197th
2017-1812th37th--173rd24th84th66th310th32nd95th33rd1st191st57th79th319th98th160th
2016-174th52nd--103rd20th31st9th214th11th215th36th13th72nd97th48th242nd247th290th
2015-1619th71st--168th26th102nd83rd325th77th40th29th26th100th134th99th331st35th119th
2014-1512th97th--43rd24th106th51st285th59th25th46th21st23rd18th152nd330th40th90th
© Copyright 2025 Erik Haslam, All Rights Reserved
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.