TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 Florida  16-17 (0.485)  |  SEC
All-Play Percentage: 0.926 (27th)
Schedule Strength: 0.741 (5th)
Record Quality: 0.158 (83rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 24.16 (21st)
Pace: 64.05 (273rd)
Momentum: -0.24 (177th)
Off. Momentum: 0.71 (164th)
Def. Momentum: -0.96 (188th)
Consistency: -9.13 (164th)
Res. Consistency: -11.57 (177th)
Away From Home: -1.61 (310th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.87 (306th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 104.78 27.32 63.09 82.58 46.63 30.30 34.76 20.25 37.95 32.03 63.35 12.52 15.55 7.45 36.70 24.52 38.78 1.98
RANK: 83rd 230th 333rd 147th 35th 86th 155th 315th 64th 37th 46th 102nd 155th 87th 96th 318th 51st 141st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 89.41 26.81 -- 78.33 38.88 26.31 31.95 28.25 32.90 23.77 53.66 8.75 12.52 4.80 33.59 36.06 30.35 2.03
RANK: 12th 97th -- 43rd 24th 106th 51st 285th 59th 25th 46th 21st 23rd 18th 152nd 330th 40th 90th

ANALYSIS:
Despite their unexceptional win percentage, Florida should be regarded as one of the better teams in college hoops. They have a record of 16-17 and are ranked 27th overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 14 schools in the SEC (average ranking 68.6), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference. With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.741 (which ranks fifth nationally), Florida is one of the more battle-tested teams in the college game.

Florida is one of the most menacing defensive teams in the country. Ranked 12th in defensive efficiency, they will allow fewer than 90 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Florida does a fantastic job to prevent opposing teams from capitalizing on chances from offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.8% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 18th in the NCAA), and with a rating of 12.52, they're 23rd in potential points allowed off of the offensive glass as well. Florida is also one of the very best in the land in overall defensive field goal percentage. The team ranks #24 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO only makes good on about 38.9% of their total attempts from the floor.

Florida is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 83rd nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 105 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Florida allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 8.75, which ranks #21 in the country. Florida also boasts one of the better offensive field goal percentages in the college game. The squad is ranked 35th in the country in field goal percentage, making approximately 46.6% of their attempts vs. AO. If Florida does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's poor shooting at the line. The squad makes just 63.1% of their free throw attempts, which ranks 19th-worst in Division I.

When playing on the road, Florida performs somewhat worse than they normally do on their home court. The club is nationally ranked 310th in our site's away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Florida does better vs. clubs that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When playing squads that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 56.74%, Florida performs above average 100% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 18% of the time.
Florida performs better against squads that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. When facing teams that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 41.12%, Florida is more efficient than normal 90% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 26% of the time.
When playing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, Florida usually performs worse than average. Florida is more efficient than normal 21% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.95%. In all other contests, Florida performs better than average 79% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-253rd3rd2nd3rdSEC47th173rd23rd8th229th6th
2023-2429th29th65th31stSEC16th104th30th11th325th44th
2022-2377th77th207th126thSEC97th259th34th361st319th42nd
2021-2255th55th135th78thSEC260th180th65th270th207th34th
2020-2144th44th112th37thSEC204th100th21st252nd176th31st
2019-2027th27th102nd45thSEC329th216th23rd284th202nd45th
2018-1929th29th136th59thSEC347th154th13th319th119th25th
2017-1816th16th98th33rdSEC270th305th19th12th5th15th
2016-174th4th29th9thSEC168th217th1st339th157th9th
2015-1645th45th128th61stSEC106th141st15th317th142nd32nd
2014-1527th27th190th83rdSEC273rd164th5th306th310th21st
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-252nd15th156th39th10th36th15th326th144th72nd8th51st35th26th56th334th113th240th
2023-2419th14th220th46th42nd228th25th170th109th40th97th77th38th47th265th192nd66th71st
2022-23121st72nd152nd189th121st206th220th271st223rd66th111th85th233rd93rd210th271st60th97th
2021-2249th49th131st83rd104th38th282nd271st56th210th25th61st83rd26th49th285th240th309th
2020-2147th88th54th230th21st294th72nd114th41st147th27th114th202nd119th282nd102nd125th83rd
2019-2023rd145th108th86th17th153rd33rd139th108th165th11th259th148th176th175th160th190th189th
2018-1965th164th128th76th105th59th183rd186th83rd224th33rd70th126th235th78th198th255th282nd
2017-1827th151st153rd9th82nd60th40th148th150th139th93rd21st166th117th112th201st209th240th
2016-1715th35th85th37th34th126th56th203rd137th58th33rd14th189th76th169th230th102nd155th
2015-1679th27th325th70th117th119th260th214th272nd78th43rd17th83rd112th149th237th123rd158th
2014-1583rd230th333rd147th35th86th155th315th64th37th46th102nd155th87th96th318th51st141st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-257th73rd--230th6th105th6th290th32nd193rd7th50th180th29th87th278th180th238th
2023-2472nd220th--164th91st19th32nd281st237th270th42nd40th45th45th21st296th267th326th
2022-2340th67th--278th49th13th43rd348th126th252nd25th164th86th38th9th346th224th329th
2021-2264th78th--55th147th93rd153rd184th164th143rd125th156th43rd88th138th224th186th216th
2020-2145th158th--156th51st157th8th118th111th243rd86th126th54th1st158th120th248th235th
2019-2053rd74th--138th62nd109th156th282nd70th97th60th97th4th61st113th292nd101st173rd
2018-1915th66th--109th24th115th23rd208th86th141st25th135th152nd15th146th234th164th197th
2017-1812th37th--173rd24th84th66th310th32nd95th33rd1st191st57th79th319th98th160th
2016-174th52nd--103rd20th31st9th214th11th215th36th13th72nd97th48th242nd247th290th
2015-1619th71st--168th26th102nd83rd325th77th40th29th26th100th134th99th331st35th119th
2014-1512th97th--43rd24th106th51st285th59th25th46th21st23rd18th152nd330th40th90th