TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 Florida State  17-16 (0.515)  |  ACC
All-Play Percentage: 0.757 (86th)
Schedule Strength: 0.651 (68th)
Record Quality: 0.137 (98th)
Avg. Season Rank: 125.07 (124th)
Pace: 66.49 (125th)
Momentum: 1.67 (83rd)
Off. Momentum: 0.13 (214th)
Def. Momentum: 1.54 (44th)
Consistency: -8.07 (54th)
Res. Consistency: -10.60 (108th)
Away From Home: 0.08 (159th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.74 (48th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.75 35.80 66.32 75.60 47.15 22.08 34.96 24.25 36.13 29.27 65.48 11.62 16.94 8.20 29.21 32.07 38.71 1.91
RANK: 117th 7th 270th 347th 22nd 329th 146th 215th 133rd 135th 21st 146th 84th 45th 300th 146th 52nd 37th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 95.66 30.09 -- 81.82 40.21 27.58 31.82 23.43 33.50 30.81 52.83 11.50 14.01 4.81 33.71 28.63 37.65 1.96
RANK: 74th 212th -- 166th 53rd 157th 48th 90th 80th 269th 31st 178th 83rd 19th 157th 92nd 277th 249th

ANALYSIS:
Despite what their win percentage might indicate, Florida State is a good team that can cause more than enough trouble for most opponents. Haslametrics has them ranked 86th overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 17-16. Of the 15 schools in the ACC (average ranking 57.1), they're currently ranked as our #12 team in the conference.

The primary strength for Florida State is defense. The team is ranked 74th in efficiency, allowing fewer than 96 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Florida State does a fantastic job to prevent opposing teams from capitalizing on chances from offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.8% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 19th in the NCAA). Florida State has also done a really good job this year to prevent opponents from making shots from the inside. They are ranked 31st in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 52.8% of their attempts from close-up.

Florida State plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 117th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 103 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Florida State does a super job in their efforts to get to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 35.80 vs. AO, they are ranked seventh in the nation at getting to the charity stripe. Unfortunately, they don't convert a ton of their free throws and make just 66.3% of their attempts. Florida State is also one of the nation's most effective teams finishing close to the iron. The team is ranked 21st in the country in near-proximity field goal percentage, making approximately 65.5% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. The team will attempt a fair amount of field goals from up-close, too. Approximately 38.7% of their attempts vs. AO are taken from near-proximity locations, which puts the team in the top-75 in that category nationally. The squad likewise lands in the top-25 in overall offensive field goal percentage and makes good on about 47.2% of their total attempts vs. AO. If Florida State does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties in getting off a sufficient number of shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of just 75.60 vs. AO, which ranks fifth-worst in college basketball.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Florida State is typically worse vs. teams that find ways to get to the free throw line. Against foes that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 31.43, Florida State performs above their norm 27% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 73% of the time.
When facing teams that tend to get off more shots, Florida State often performs better than normal. Florida State is more efficient than usual 70% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 80.69. In their other contests, Florida State performs better than the norm 30% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2591st91st164th103rdACC74th119th76th317th172nd83rd
2023-2482nd82nd184th84thACC40th186th16th260th212th91st
2022-23180th179th335th226thACC123rd90th58th169th179th170th
2021-22140th140th161st80thACC162nd354th40th340th347th85th
2020-2122nd21st35th18thACC136th233rd55th29th320th22nd
2019-2014th13th9th3rdACC96th58th43rd171st239th17th
2018-1916th16th25th15thACC170th158th30th28th115th23rd
2017-1831st31st71st36thACC61st207th44th124th157th35th
2016-1726th26th33rd19thACC52nd65th45th110th349th18th
2015-1656th56th124th66thACC43rd86th25th109th300th46th
2014-1586th86th172nd98thACC125th54th68th48th159th124th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25127th18th202nd313th86th332nd223rd105th185th170th48th133rd121st48th327th82nd134th58th
2023-2488th16th231st246th52nd335th197th70th104th154th42nd5th207th51st330th61st128th48th
2022-23154th118th146th248th111th290th177th80th185th248th60th49th260th110th278th65th225th133rd
2021-22136th53rd202nd137th146th293rd222nd73rd268th135th97th28th89th81st294th78th139th69th
2020-2122nd46th71st233rd10th280th26th222nd64th50th22nd62nd64th3rd273rd214th43rd46th
2019-2024th95th73rd64th25th228th37th74th54th150th41st38th101st37th268th82nd183rd119th
2018-1945th14th98th161st74th232nd123rd191st229th83rd51st50th72nd14th232nd194th89th93rd
2017-1852nd6th282nd215th39th227th145th322nd181st11th60th25th93rd50th215th316th13th36th
2016-1730th5th233rd91st22nd299th133rd162nd88th17th41st21st37th10th313th176th28th18th
2015-1646th23rd165th194th26th255th139th183rd157th71st14th40th42nd9th251st184th65th68th
2014-15117th7th270th347th22nd329th146th215th133rd135th21st146th84th45th300th146th52nd37th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2582nd219th--162nd47th276th76th24th9th265th44th124th301st139th282nd16th279th168th
2023-2484th275th--19th148th100th165th28th120th226th113th26th222nd225th184th49th306th260th
2022-23252nd140th--227th147th334th313th41st72nd190th102nd83rd221st227th329th26th179th78th
2021-22161st167th--130th141st316th326th15th16th195th95th267th244th288th329th12th203rd83rd
2020-2132nd253rd--185th3rd274th27th141st36th149th2nd168th301st146th276th136th136th101st
2019-2019th114th--32nd37th173rd56th22nd67th188th39th76th109th158th248th41st252nd179th
2018-1912th129th--47th12th112th76th222nd39th72nd8th14th73rd41st172nd272nd108th139th
2017-1839th176th--110th28th198th156th88th185th187th3rd36th268th48th230th107th211th166th
2016-1735th145th--74th41st107th110th137th26th166th29th15th91st31st147th175th206th215th
2015-1676th141st--64th117th152nd233rd86th22nd183rd120th132nd18th30th205th117th230th190th
2014-1574th212th--166th53rd157th48th90th80th269th31st178th83rd19th157th92nd277th249th