TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 Georgetown  15-15 (0.500)  |  Big East
All-Play Percentage: 0.754 (88th)
Schedule Strength: 0.641 (73rd)
Record Quality: 0.107 (117th)
Avg. Season Rank: 115.72 (109th)
Pace: 71.80 (79th)
Momentum: 0.62 (143rd)
Off. Momentum: 3.39 (33rd)
Def. Momentum: -2.77 (297th)
Consistency: -7.63 (24th)
Res. Consistency: -9.86 (56th)
Away From Home: 3.20 (1st)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.90 (40th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 107.78 30.08 76.49 80.05 46.30 27.30 38.99 25.78 38.60 26.97 61.07 10.04 16.95 8.45 34.10 32.21 33.70 2.00
RANK: 78th 32nd 35th 270th 76th 280th 30th 89th 108th 242nd 123rd 222nd 61st 57th 269th 70th 210th 131st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.33 22.75 -- 82.73 43.17 32.85 35.96 23.65 36.70 26.24 58.02 11.70 11.84 4.81 39.70 28.58 31.72 2.08
RANK: 125th 57th -- 209th 118th 273rd 208th 231st 150th 86th 102nd 245th 21st 15th 269th 229th 82nd 82nd

ANALYSIS:
Georgetown is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. Haslametrics has them ranked 88th overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 15-15. They are also ranked by this site as the #9 team (out of 10) in the Big East (average ranking 41.9).

Georgetown succeeds primarily through their offense. They are ranked 78th in offensive efficiency and score in excess of 107 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Georgetown is one of the more accurate teams in the college game when it comes to shooting the three. They're ranked 30th nationally in three-point field goal percentage and make about 39.0% of their attempts from there vs. AO. Though they convert many of their threes, the team doesn't really shoot a ton of them. Only 34.1% of their total attempts vs. AO are from long-distance. Georgetown also does a really good job to acquire opportunities from the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 30.08 vs. AO, they are ranked 32nd in the nation at getting to the charity stripe. In addition, the team is in the top-50 in free throw shooting, converting a solid 76.5% of their attempts.

Georgetown plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 125th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 100 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Georgetown does a fantastic job to prevent opposing teams from capitalizing on chances from offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.8% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 15th in the NCAA), and with a rating of 11.84, they're 21st in potential points allowed off of the offensive glass as well. Georgetown also makes a point to avoid fouls and prevent opponents from getting to the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 22.75 vs. AO, they are currently rated 57th in the country in that category.

Georgetown is one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked 24th in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict. When playing on the road, Georgetown has played their best basketball this season. The team is currently ranked first in the country in the away-from-home metric our site tracks.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that convert well from outside the arc, Georgetown often performs better than normal. Georgetown is more efficient than usual 71% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.26%. In their other contests, Georgetown performs better than the norm 22% of the time.
Georgetown does worse vs. clubs that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When playing squads that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 11.22, Georgetown performs above average 22% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 71% of the time.
Georgetown performs better against squads that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 61.69%, Georgetown is more efficient than normal 70% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 30% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2580th79th175th104thBig East113th43rd84th241st285th93rd
2023-24196th196th326th255thBig East230th170th83rd90th23rd206th
2022-23209th209th348th268thBig East86th50th42nd110th37th182nd
2021-22163rd163rd344th269thBig East75th86th38th292nd144th156th
2020-2156th56th179th75thBig East117th241st25th175th31st93rd
2019-2077th77th224th106thBig East81st15th26th205th146th48th
2018-19106th106th127th66thBig East46th116th69th12th67th99th
2017-1888th86th182nd117thBig East79th24th73rd40th1st109th
2016-1766th66th239th112thBig East146th97th31st247th217th56th
2015-1649th49th211th133rdBig East210th277th31st119th22nd51st
2014-1528th28th64th27thBig East210th58th9th204th180th30th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25111th258th228th46th136th103rd150th212th263rd125th89th62nd10th41st134th230th161st205th
2023-24120th52nd210th146th228th56th156th241st269th234th189th308th7th25th63rd245th240th294th
2022-23175th113th193rd142nd185th300th254th13th78th301st167th110th78th142nd308th15th305th152nd
2021-22110th60th96th54th246th147th133rd233rd318th48th282nd67th1st33rd189th258th76th115th
2020-2176th54th45th191st122nd168th27th99th106th294th209th41st27th33rd171st94th289th252nd
2019-2049th98th21st78th71st277th48th14th33rd288th128th64th48th71st296th23rd301st173rd
2018-1989th70th74th101st160th218th133rd30th171st271st74th107th110th55th235th34th294th211th
2017-1878th32nd35th270th76th280th30th89th108th242nd123rd222nd61st57th269th70th210th131st
2016-1775th28th61st331st46th296th93rd202nd33rd126th90th311th246th85th257th155th72nd60th
2015-1650th90th8th221st59th62nd154th137th10th340th17th282nd296th246th61st128th338th331st
2014-1538th9th121st272nd43rd199th70th279th58th98th98th60th91st40th166th271st66th122nd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2581st156th--92nd95th74th57th199th178th211th65th136th278th203rd93rd221st244th267th
2023-24290th271st--118th312th180th257th87th90th260th347th278th321st349th193rd90th270th236th
2022-23243rd28th--345th162nd263rd351st102nd44th341st56th353rd354th308th198th48th306th253rd
2021-22244th73rd--196th236th297th320th67th103rd191st271st100th263rd265th286th60th178th99th
2020-2138th24th--280th43rd277th125th246th87th121st23rd97th125th34th248th213th93rd90th
2019-20126th38th--203rd114th312th275th130th43rd98th137th245th112th201st314th128th80th55th
2018-19146th155th--248th94th254th139th283rd44th81st207th246th132nd101st231st274th57th76th
2017-18125th57th--209th118th273rd208th231st150th86th102nd245th21st15th269th229th82nd82nd
2016-1757th269th--219th33rd53rd6th292nd28th219th75th151st121st138th42nd287th201st274th
2015-1675th343rd--59th23rd26th127th264th6th146th32nd240th69th57th49th293rd184th254th
2014-1545th265th--29th36th127th190th145th16th78th23rd42nd68th110th201st215th118th136th