TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Yale  23-10 (0.697)  |  Ivy
All-Play Percentage: 0.731 (99th)
Schedule Strength: 0.499 (127th)
Record Quality: 0.211 (79th)
Avg. Season Rank: 92.46 (92nd)
Pace: 65.43 (325th)
Momentum: -1.62 (243rd)
Off. Momentum: -0.38 (222nd)
Def. Momentum: -1.24 (224th)
Consistency: -8.40 (74th)
Res. Consistency: -11.67 (140th)
Away From Home: -0.07 (185th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.64 (249th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 109.33 24.97 70.28 87.28 46.12 31.17 36.20 23.44 40.51 32.68 59.59 9.82 9.48 4.16 35.71 26.85 37.44 1.98
RANK: 103rd 240th 259th 91st 84th 195th 78th 162nd 121st 105th 112th 267th 346th 307th 230th 169th 127th 128th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.46 24.49 -- 85.82 42.58 32.76 34.27 25.24 38.12 27.81 56.40 11.57 10.23 4.32 38.17 29.41 32.41 2.06
RANK: 116th 100th -- 191st 99th 246th 175th 273rd 141st 63rd 121st 189th 10th 46th 240th 281st 56th 72nd

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, Yale should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. Their record this season is 23-10, and the club is ranked 99th overall (out of 362) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. Of the eight schools in the Ivy League (average ranking 190.0), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference.

Yale will likely rely on their offense more than anything else to win games. The team is ranked 103rd in offensive efficiency and scores more than 109 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Yale has been generally quite good when shooting the three-pointer. They're ranked 78th nationally in three-point field goal percentage and make about 36.2% of their attempts from there vs. AO. If Yale does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties obtaining second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad only has a rating of 9.48 vs. AO in potential points off of second chances, which ranks 17th-worst in college hoops.

Yale plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 116th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 102 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Yale does a super job to deny opponents offensive rebounds and second chances. They have a rating of 10.23 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked tenth in the country), and they allow AO to convert just 4.3% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 46th) as well.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Yale performs better against squads that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities. When facing teams that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 86.04, Yale is more efficient than normal 68% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 22% of the time.
When playing teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities, Yale usually performs better than average. Yale is more efficient than normal 75% of the time when facing clubs that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 11.49. In all other contests, Yale performs better than average 33% of the time.
Yale is typically worse vs. teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.87%, Yale performs above their norm 39% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 77% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2573rd73rd36th74thIvy League191st84th170th124th301st87th
2023-2499th98th42nd79thIvy League325th74th127th249th185th92nd
2022-2363rd63rd53rd69thIvy League264th252nd120th190th199th72nd
2021-22173rd173rd117th134thIvy League104th22nd162nd337th169th169th
2020-21115th115th--170thIvy League86th--------114th
2019-2088th88th26th59thIvy League242nd94th155th107th102nd57th
2018-1969th69th38th63rdIvy League35th306th158th273rd148th68th
2017-18205th205th171st176thIvy League166th152nd166th327th144th208th
2016-17155th155th104th116thIvy League210th89th175th267th63rd115th
2015-1648th48th24th53rdIvy League269th292nd178th321st155th59th
2014-1593rd93rd53rd72ndIvy League285th84th129th184th54th115th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2568th141st132nd62nd77th277th38th119th44th63rd221st323rd223rd209th301st135th98th53rd
2023-24103rd240th259th91st84th195th78th162nd121st105th112th267th346th307th230th169th127th128th
2022-2383rd116th261st107th84th227th38th255th132nd30th208th121st251st119th247th268th35th64th
2021-22229th151st104th250th225th184th279th191st67th222nd250th210th253rd188th166th177th193rd205th
2020-21130th205th211th219th103rd64th119th293rd154th206th87th224th297th162nd55th291st191st278th
2019-2086th224th195th203rd61st39th61st330th133rd163rd68th299th232nd115th32nd325th148th275th
2018-1946th247th100th224th11th210th56th206th59th136th9th192nd236th65th197th202nd120th137th
2017-18189th249th215th222nd144th65th282nd282nd229th214th37th167th258th254th64th280th197th276th
2016-17116th209th127th141st116th154th159th215th129th102nd136th278th103rd96th158th227th117th171st
2015-1689th14th280th244th65th237th171st151st14th163rd126th343rd44th45th223rd132nd143rd126th
2014-15113th88th75th288th126th135th92nd170th83rd307th124th281st167th154th93rd148th297th283rd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25109th61st--293rd79th331st72nd193rd62nd111th171st90th61st40th303rd176th80th59th
2023-24116th100th--191st99th246th175th273rd141st63rd121st189th10th46th240th281st56th72nd
2022-2350th235th--70th45th146th142nd241st47th54th50th184th26th3rd196th280th70th108th
2021-22120th276th--139th134th149th29th229th197th140th218th335th250th267th169th235th143rd181st
2020-21115th118th--293rd82nd223rd80th305th97th120th157th253rd60th90th178th283rd88th122nd
2019-2097th40th--291st82nd199th87th304th136th129th116th144th100th44th142nd284th79th144th
2018-19126th189th--289th65th124th35th301st62nd208th104th304th227th221st86th287th157th224th
2017-18229th201st--211th246th66th106th202nd241st286th244th321st224th266th56th203rd269th306th
2016-17211th88th--327th147th229th98th135th159th321st109th338th239th162nd154th88th281st249th
2015-1621st51st--156th49th56th24th323rd294th64th18th270th22nd44th60th330th73rd174th
2014-1575th62nd--247th127th88th22nd262nd120th255th198th333rd244th190th59th242nd227th275th