TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Yale  22-8 (0.733)  |  Ivy
All-Play Percentage: 0.802 (73rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.434 (170th)
Record Quality: 0.211 (74th)
Avg. Season Rank: 86.01 (85th)
Pace: 66.46 (191st)
Momentum: -2.04 (273rd)
Off. Momentum: -1.88 (305th)
Def. Momentum: -0.16 (179th)
Consistency: -8.76 (83rd)
Res. Consistency: -11.69 (118th)
Away From Home: -1.80 (301st)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.37 (124th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 115.27 28.14 73.48 89.86 46.28 30.61 37.32 23.98 41.36 35.26 57.40 9.19 13.73 5.71 34.07 26.69 39.24 1.95
RANK: 69th 140th 132nd 62nd 76th 279th 38th 118th 43rd 62nd 222nd 323rd 221st 208th 302nd 134th 99th 53rd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.03 23.81 -- 89.71 41.62 37.83 32.24 21.55 34.05 30.34 58.68 10.88 12.96 4.57 42.17 24.02 33.82 2.08
RANK: 109th 60th -- 293rd 79th 331st 71st 192nd 61st 111th 172nd 88th 60th 39th 303rd 176th 79th 59th

ANALYSIS:
Yale has a fairly solid squad that likely falls within the top quartile of all teams in college basketball this year. Ranked 73rd overall (out of 364) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 22-8. Of the eight schools in the Ivy League (average ranking 191.8), they're currently ranked as the best team in the conference.

Yale has a reasonably potent offensive attack. Occupying the #69 slot in our offensive efficiency rankings, they will score about 115 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Yale is one of the more accurate teams in the college game when it comes to shooting the three. They're ranked 38th nationally in three-point field goal percentage and make about 37.3% of their attempts from there vs. AO. Though they convert many of their threes, the team doesn't really shoot a ton of them. Only 34.1% of their total attempts vs. AO are from long-distance. Yale also has a keen ability to drain field goals between the three-point line and the low post. The squad is ranked 43rd nationally in mid-range field goal percentage, making about 41.4% of their attempts from those locations vs. AO.

Yale plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 109th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 105 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Yale is one of the better teams when it comes to not allowing opponents to convert scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.6% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 39th in the NCAA). Yale also makes a point to avoid fouls and prevent opponents from getting to the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 23.81 vs. AO, they are currently rated 60th in the country in that category. If Yale does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's unwillingness to take risks in order to score fast points off of the opposition's turnovers. The squad only has a rating of 9.19 in potential points scored off of steals vs. AO, which ranks 42nd-worst in the college game.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Yale does worse vs. clubs that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When playing squads that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 56.03%, Yale performs above average 35% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 75% of the time.
Yale performs worse against squads that are typically efficient on offense. When facing teams that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 106.40, Yale is more efficient than normal 27% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 67% of the time.
When playing teams that allow more chances at the line, Yale usually performs better than average. Yale is more efficient than normal 69% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 25.89. In all other contests, Yale performs better than average 31% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2573rd73rd36th74thIvy League191st83rd170th124th301st85th
2023-2499th98th42nd79thIvy League325th74th127th249th185th92nd
2022-2363rd63rd53rd69thIvy League264th252nd120th190th199th72nd
2021-22173rd173rd117th134thIvy League104th22nd162nd337th169th169th
2020-21115th115th--170thIvy League86th--------114th
2019-2088th88th26th59thIvy League242nd94th155th107th102nd57th
2018-1969th69th38th63rdIvy League35th306th158th273rd148th68th
2017-18205th205th171st176thIvy League166th152nd166th327th144th208th
2016-17155th155th104th116thIvy League210th89th175th267th63rd115th
2015-1648th48th24th53rdIvy League269th292nd178th321st155th59th
2014-1593rd93rd53rd72ndIvy League285th84th129th184th54th115th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2569th140th132nd62nd76th279th38th118th43rd62nd222nd323rd221st208th302nd134th99th53rd
2023-24103rd240th259th91st84th195th78th162nd121st105th112th267th346th307th230th169th127th128th
2022-2383rd116th261st107th84th227th38th255th132nd30th208th121st251st119th247th268th35th64th
2021-22229th151st104th250th225th184th279th191st67th222nd250th210th253rd188th166th177th193rd205th
2020-21130th205th211th219th103rd64th119th293rd154th206th87th224th297th162nd55th291st191st278th
2019-2086th224th195th203rd61st39th61st330th133rd163rd68th299th232nd115th32nd325th148th275th
2018-1946th247th100th224th11th210th56th206th59th136th9th192nd236th65th197th202nd120th137th
2017-18189th249th215th222nd144th65th282nd282nd229th214th37th167th258th254th64th280th197th276th
2016-17116th209th127th141st116th154th159th215th129th102nd136th278th103rd96th158th227th117th171st
2015-1689th14th280th244th65th237th171st151st14th163rd126th343rd44th45th223rd132nd143rd126th
2014-15113th88th75th288th126th135th92nd170th83rd307th124th281st167th154th93rd148th297th283rd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25109th60th--293rd79th331st71st192nd61st111th172nd88th60th39th303rd176th79th59th
2023-24116th100th--191st99th246th175th273rd141st63rd121st189th10th46th240th281st56th72nd
2022-2350th235th--70th45th146th142nd241st47th54th50th184th26th3rd196th280th70th108th
2021-22120th276th--139th134th149th29th229th197th140th218th335th250th267th169th235th143rd181st
2020-21115th118th--293rd82nd223rd80th305th97th120th157th253rd60th90th178th283rd88th122nd
2019-2097th40th--291st82nd199th87th304th136th129th116th144th100th44th142nd284th79th144th
2018-19126th189th--289th65th124th35th301st62nd208th104th304th227th221st86th287th157th224th
2017-18229th201st--211th246th66th106th202nd241st286th244th321st224th266th56th203rd269th306th
2016-17211th88th--327th147th229th98th135th159th321st109th338th239th162nd154th88th281st249th
2015-1621st51st--156th49th56th24th323rd294th64th18th270th22nd44th60th330th73rd174th
2014-1575th62nd--247th127th88th22nd262nd120th255th198th333rd244th190th59th242nd227th275th