TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 FGCU  23-12 (0.657)  |  Atlantic Sun
All-Play Percentage: 0.609 (138th)
Schedule Strength: 0.354 (312th)
Record Quality: 0.025 (161st)
Avg. Season Rank: 127.09 (123rd)
Pace: 73.72 (27th)
Momentum: -1.19 (222nd)
Off. Momentum: 1.52 (105th)
Def. Momentum: -2.71 (293rd)
Consistency: -10.51 (315th)
Res. Consistency: -11.24 (139th)
Away From Home: 1.61 (17th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.24 (284th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.65 24.62 74.03 80.72 46.34 28.45 37.26 19.60 37.36 32.67 59.65 12.18 15.53 7.31 35.25 24.28 40.47 1.95
RANK: 133rd 231st 84th 233rd 75th 253rd 84th 263rd 155th 38th 174th 86th 128th 116th 232nd 262nd 30th 53rd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.86 28.66 -- 79.33 44.47 30.93 34.79 19.03 36.31 29.37 59.97 12.42 14.16 7.14 38.99 23.99 37.02 2.02
RANK: 139th 278th -- 63rd 160th 195th 136th 45th 137th 202nd 163rd 294th 138th 209th 245th 55th 242nd 172nd

ANALYSIS:
FGCU is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. Haslametrics has them ranked 138th overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 23-12. Of the eight schools in the Atlantic Sun (average ranking 264.8), they're currently ranked as the best team in the conference.

Based on the data, FGCU will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 104 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #133 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. FGCU will make a strong effort to get off as many field goals close to the basket as they can. The ball-club is 30th in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. As far as converting those near-proximity shots goes, the team shoots 59.6% vs. AO, which falls somewhere in the middle of the pack of the rankings in that category. FGCU has also been fairly successful when shooting from the field. The squad is ranked 75th in the country in field goal percentage, making approximately 46.3% of their attempts vs. AO.

FGCU plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 139th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 101 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. FGCU has been doing fairly decent work to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 63rd in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 79.33 vs. AO.

FGCU has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 315th in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most. When playing on the road, FGCU has played their best basketball this season. The team is currently ranked 17th in the country in the away-from-home metric our site tracks.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
FGCU does better vs. clubs that prefer the outside shot. When playing squads that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 1.98, FGCU performs above average 73% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 20% of the time.
FGCU performs better against squads that do not defend well on the perimeter. When facing teams that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.76%, FGCU is more efficient than normal 79% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 39% of the time.
When playing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, FGCU usually performs worse than average. FGCU is more efficient than normal 42% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.33%. In all other contests, FGCU performs better than average 77% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25196th195th145th176thAtlantic Sun271st34th277th207th199th158th
2023-24225th225th249th292ndAtlantic Sun338th351st246th141st57th234th
2022-23190th190th166th190thAtlantic Sun205th339th225th167th111th159th
2021-22227th227th87th158thAtlantic Sun48th28th283rd135th289th213th
2020-21274th274th142nd269thAtlantic Sun66th311th334th102nd249th248th
2019-20298th298th301st317thAtlantic Sun299th32nd240th330th178th332nd
2018-19206th206th230th224thAtlantic Sun155th310th162nd322nd255th231st
2017-18138th138th71st161stAtlantic Sun27th315th312th284th17th123rd
2016-17109th109th26th85thAtlantic Sun262nd128th281st47th95th104th
2015-16159th159th118th193rdAtlantic Sun244th194th290th46th145th185th
2014-15209th209th64th134thAtlantic Sun159th286th313th49th88th160th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25192nd348th282nd68th134th163rd195th238th83rd50th199th250th150th104th192nd257th79th105th
2023-24225th350th306th140th152nd137th109th136th79th244th209th191st238th148th143rd145th252nd247th
2022-23168th310th145th170th219th18th93rd287th86th294th251st233rd193rd163rd21st293rd297th344th
2021-22161st277th335th188th122nd28th116th347th258th112th115th98th105th19th28th346th110th278th
2020-21302nd313th319th68th312th56th350th335th211th30th290th148th81st63rd79th343rd48th163rd
2019-20340th351st188th255th310th75th274th258th262nd267th273rd275th282nd277th60th240th252nd284th
2018-19203rd180th299th328th131st132nd38th303rd348th215th104th112th247th107th74th285th152nd234th
2017-18133rd231st84th233rd75th253rd84th263rd155th38th174th86th128th116th232nd262nd30th53rd
2016-1798th180th202nd80th74th208th293rd266th126th14th75th171st90th40th229th282nd26th39th
2015-16179th100th333rd228th76th349th269th129th78th10th172nd180th134th71st349th116th4th2nd
2014-15223rd279th272nd28th241st207th263rd259th273rd4th289th134th52nd174th239th297th14th34th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25235th194th--273rd155th277th307th173rd130th194th100th221st147th73rd253rd154th160th132nd
2023-24212th127th--260th209th317th244th120th233rd164th214th196th267th280th310th98th139th82nd
2022-23201st156th--224th206th235th127th132nd321st251st166th156th305th178th222nd106th245th196th
2021-22278th84th--348th244th198th199th177th320th343rd127th343rd315th275th115th107th315th296th
2020-21203rd95th--338th141st266th102nd183rd321st288th51st306th353rd342nd184th122nd228th198th
2019-20190th110th--282nd150th172nd246th155th126th299th87th326th313th294th133rd129th282nd261st
2018-19208th75th--322nd136th312th261st118th109th238th94th348th337th273rd273rd82nd174th126th
2017-18139th278th--63rd160th195th136th45th137th202nd163rd294th138th209th245th55th242nd172nd
2016-17144th266th--202nd123rd185th19th116th280th268th113th208th285th275th161st99th260th237th
2015-16138th231st--285th76th228th10th43rd116th328th54th278th214th211th176th20th321st293rd
2014-15190th195th--315th116th204th60th97th232nd323rd57th168th310th217th145th58th306th278th