TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 FGCU  21-14 (0.600)  |  Atlantic Sun
All-Play Percentage: 0.549 (159th)
Schedule Strength: 0.379 (290th)
Record Quality: -0.052 (193rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 183.34 (185th)
Pace: 68.65 (244th)
Momentum: 5.30 (10th)
Off. Momentum: 3.34 (33rd)
Def. Momentum: 1.96 (44th)
Consistency: -9.07 (194th)
Res. Consistency: -12.91 (263rd)
Away From Home: 0.21 (145th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.91 (46th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.18 30.36 64.14 80.98 45.73 20.26 32.77 25.35 37.95 35.37 58.73 10.54 15.63 7.88 25.02 31.31 43.68 1.81
RANK: 179th 100th 333rd 228th 76th 349th 269th 129th 78th 10th 172nd 180th 134th 71st 349th 116th 4th 2nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.65 30.23 -- 84.78 41.64 29.77 30.39 20.31 34.70 34.70 55.35 12.23 15.71 7.18 35.11 23.96 40.93 1.94
RANK: 138th 231st -- 285th 76th 228th 10th 43rd 116th 328th 54th 278th 214th 211th 176th 20th 321st 293rd

ANALYSIS:
They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but FGCU, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. Ranked 159th overall (out of 351) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 21-14. They are also ranked by this site as the best team (out of eight) in the Atlantic Sun (average ranking 240.9).

FGCU will likely call on their defense to win a majority of their games. The team is ranked 138th in defensive efficiency and allows fewer than 101 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. FGCU does an outstanding job shutting down the opposition from behind the arc. They rank tenth in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 30.4% of their attempts from afar. FGCU has also been pretty good preventing teams from hitting shots in the paint. They are ranked 54th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 55.4% of their attempts from close-up. And to capitalize on that weakness, this team will make AO shoot from the inside more than they usually would. Of AO's total field goals, a big portion of them (40.9%) will be from short-distance.

FGCU is not quite as good on the offensive end of the floor. The team is ranked 179th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 100 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. FGCU has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 64.1% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #333 overall in free throw percentage.

FGCU has been playing some of its most efficient basketball of the season recently and is presently ranked tenth in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass, FGCU often performs better than normal. FGCU is more efficient than usual 60% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.93%. In their other contests, FGCU performs better than the norm 18% of the time.
FGCU does worse vs. clubs that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. When playing squads that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.58%, FGCU performs above average 18% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 60% of the time.
FGCU performs better against squads that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. When facing teams that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 17.76, FGCU is more efficient than normal 70% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 33% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25196th196th145th176thAtlantic Sun271st34th277th206th199th158th
2023-24225th225th249th292ndAtlantic Sun338th351st246th141st57th234th
2022-23190th190th166th190thAtlantic Sun205th339th225th167th111th159th
2021-22227th227th87th158thAtlantic Sun48th28th283rd135th289th213th
2020-21274th274th142nd269thAtlantic Sun66th311th334th102nd249th248th
2019-20298th298th301st317thAtlantic Sun299th32nd240th330th178th332nd
2018-19206th206th230th224thAtlantic Sun155th310th162nd322nd255th231st
2017-18138th138th71st161stAtlantic Sun27th315th312th284th17th123rd
2016-17109th109th26th85thAtlantic Sun262nd128th281st47th95th104th
2015-16159th159th118th193rdAtlantic Sun244th194th290th46th145th185th
2014-15209th209th64th134thAtlantic Sun159th286th313th49th88th160th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25193rd348th282nd69th134th162nd195th238th84th51st198th251st151st103rd193rd255th79th105th
2023-24225th350th306th140th152nd137th109th136th79th244th209th191st238th148th143rd145th252nd247th
2022-23168th310th145th170th219th18th93rd287th86th294th251st233rd193rd163rd21st293rd297th344th
2021-22161st277th335th188th122nd28th116th347th258th112th115th98th105th19th28th346th110th278th
2020-21302nd313th319th68th312th56th350th335th211th30th290th148th81st63rd79th343rd48th163rd
2019-20340th351st188th255th310th75th274th258th262nd267th273rd275th282nd277th60th240th252nd284th
2018-19203rd180th299th328th131st132nd38th303rd348th215th104th112th247th107th74th285th152nd234th
2017-18133rd231st84th233rd75th253rd84th263rd155th38th174th86th128th116th232nd262nd30th53rd
2016-1798th180th202nd80th74th208th293rd266th126th14th75th171st90th40th229th282nd26th39th
2015-16179th100th333rd228th76th349th269th129th78th10th172nd180th134th71st349th116th4th2nd
2014-15223rd279th272nd28th241st207th263rd259th273rd4th289th134th52nd174th239th297th14th34th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25236th194th--276th155th278th308th173rd131st193rd100th222nd147th73rd255th154th158th131st
2023-24212th127th--260th209th317th244th120th233rd164th214th196th267th280th310th98th139th82nd
2022-23201st156th--224th206th235th127th132nd321st251st166th156th305th178th222nd106th245th196th
2021-22278th84th--348th244th198th199th177th320th343rd127th343rd315th275th115th107th315th296th
2020-21203rd95th--338th141st266th102nd183rd321st288th51st306th353rd342nd184th122nd228th198th
2019-20190th110th--282nd150th172nd246th155th126th299th87th326th313th294th133rd129th282nd261st
2018-19208th75th--322nd136th312th261st118th109th238th94th348th337th273rd273rd82nd174th126th
2017-18139th278th--63rd160th195th136th45th137th202nd163rd294th138th209th245th55th242nd172nd
2016-17144th266th--202nd123rd185th19th116th280th268th113th208th285th275th161st99th260th237th
2015-16138th231st--285th76th228th10th43rd116th328th54th278th214th211th176th20th321st293rd
2014-15190th195th--315th116th204th60th97th232nd323rd57th168th310th217th145th58th306th278th