TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 UConn  20-15 (0.571)  |  American
All-Play Percentage: 0.789 (75th)
Schedule Strength: 0.588 (97th)
Record Quality: 0.145 (93rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 70.82 (70th)
Pace: 62.82 (318th)
Momentum: -0.69 (206th)
Off. Momentum: 0.36 (199th)
Def. Momentum: -1.06 (193rd)
Consistency: -8.17 (57th)
Res. Consistency: -9.93 (57th)
Away From Home: -0.01 (169th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.09 (200th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 104.41 28.33 70.45 83.23 44.41 29.44 35.77 29.06 34.18 24.73 66.72 10.75 14.56 5.99 35.37 34.92 29.71 2.06
RANK: 86th 191st 134th 121st 107th 122nd 107th 73rd 224th 308th 15th 204th 208th 241st 140th 73rd 321st 287th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 95.18 27.43 -- 85.14 39.11 29.64 33.12 27.62 31.25 27.89 53.25 12.35 14.59 5.46 34.81 32.44 32.75 2.02
RANK: 68th 117th -- 300th 27th 247th 93rd 267th 25th 145th 39th 246th 122nd 48th 205th 227th 105th 120th

ANALYSIS:
While this site doesn't quite consider them to be in the national title hunt, UConn has the potential to be a formidable opponent for many in Division I. Ranked 75th overall (out of 351) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 20-15. They are also ranked by this site as the #4 team (out of 11) in the AAC (average ranking 151.7).

UConn has a fairly effective defensive attack. Occupying the #68 slot in our defensive efficiency ratings, they will allow about 95 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. UConn will take a bite out of many opponents' shooting percentages, based on the fact that the team ranks in the top-50 in three of our four primary defensive field goal categories. They're most likely to shut you down inside the three-point arc, considering the team limits AO to converting just 31.2% of their mid-range jumpers (25th in the nation), 53.2% of their near-proximity chances (39th), and 39.1% of their total shots from the field (27th). UConn is also one of the better teams when it comes to not allowing opponents to convert scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 5.5% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 48th in the NCAA).

UConn plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 86th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 104 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UConn is one of the nation's most effective teams finishing close to the iron. The team is ranked 15th in the country in near-proximity field goal percentage, making approximately 66.7% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. However, even with their high conversion rate on near-proximity attempts, this team usually settles for shots from longer distances. Only about 29.7% of their total attempts vs. AO are from the inside.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UConn does worse vs. clubs that effectively clean the offensive glass. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 16.63, UConn performs above average 21% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 67% of the time.
UConn performs worse against squads that favor a faster tempo. When facing teams that have a pace vs. AO greater than 65.25, UConn is more efficient than normal 20% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 60% of the time.
When playing teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively, UConn usually performs worse than average. UConn is more efficient than normal 38% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 92.00. In all other contests, UConn performs better than average 73% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2527th27th53rd26thBig East351st175th51st340th257th22nd
2023-241st1st1st1stBig East334th190th42nd33rd82nd4th
2022-231st1st14th7thBig East236th275th19th36th53rd4th
2021-2223rd23rd56th28thBig East330th127th56th323rd223rd19th
2020-2119th18th83rd29thBig East331st70th48th154th152nd28th
2019-2051st51st102nd77thAAC179th83rd86th98th175th69th
2018-1981st81st195th146thAAC185th13th88th335th341st74th
2017-18180th179th230th164thAAC234th124th80th81st298th160th
2016-1782nd82nd195th133rdAAC300th245th69th190th82nd99th
2015-1638th38th58th36thAAC320th103rd64th311th120th34th
2014-1575th75th133rd93rdAAC318th57th97th200th169th70th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2516th121st14th34th31st70th75th329th187th19th33rd233rd27th7th95th335th49th159th
2023-241st37th76th20th3rd58th88th340th26th8th4th140th55th8th103rd346th17th105th
2022-232nd82nd22nd10th21st22nd25th308th246th61st9th48th9th7th53rd332nd117th246th
2021-2219th70th105th2nd94th179th76th35th122nd138th120th186th2nd15th247th74th227th153rd
2020-2126th24th184th12th93rd227th116th85th142nd28th167th96th5th17th292nd138th75th55th
2019-2053rd53rd79th63rd110th210th167th244th281st13th140th18th3rd2nd249th266th27th44th
2018-1967th138th266th65th81st178th116th208th81st54th141st87th62nd60th213th232nd72nd91st
2017-18151st139th72nd164th160th261st230th63rd98th231st145th139th134th149th262nd60th235th148th
2016-17110th77th112th235th98th300th99th50th90th258th97th334th129th103rd291st41st241st125th
2015-1655th266th1st77th57th192nd51st66th63rd215th69th88th252nd199th222nd73rd247th180th
2014-1586th191st134th121st107th122nd107th73rd224th308th15th204th208th241st140th73rd321st287th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2549th342nd--52nd27th6th63rd214th66th305th2nd110th129th64th9th242nd336th355th
2023-243rd20th--294th2nd21st2nd352nd30th194th1st33rd164th80th14th348th155th305th
2022-235th223rd--114th2nd41st13th330th4th95th7th101st34th8th54th342nd107th235th
2021-2239th131st--194th41st38th265th289th17th262nd11th12th107th109th31st298th261st310th
2020-2122nd294th--77th11th46th43rd195th41st228th5th20th305th85th63rd221st264th298th
2019-2065th138th--66th118th13th265th148th185th313th14th216th202nd245th18th185th339th342nd
2018-19128th243rd--77th143rd27th193rd72nd209th314th41st227th182nd119th40th93rd338th336th
2017-18204th175th--262nd111th337th232nd104th188th115th53rd119th335th248th327th82nd101st46th
2016-1770th150th--334th8th331st44th254th54th91st16th293rd306th4th313th197th45th30th
2015-1618th118th--167th16th225th74th263rd33rd77th16th60th38th24th228th262nd78th87th
2014-1568th117th--300th27th247th93rd267th25th145th39th246th122nd48th205th227th105th120th