Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Texas A&M-CC21-12 (0.636) | Southland
All-Play Percentage: 0.490 (185th)
Schedule Strength: 0.263 (344th)
Record Quality: -0.040 (200th)
Avg. Season Rank: 220.26 (217th)
Pace: 69.16 (90th)
Momentum: 0.13 (163rd)
Off. Momentum: -1.10 (261st)
Def. Momentum: 1.23 (84th)
Consistency: -8.67 (118th)
Res. Consistency: -9.01 (9th)
Away From Home: -0.57 (232nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.49 (14th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
100.42
69.17
28.89
71.59
86.91
35.81
41.21
25.62
8.11
31.67
23.19
7.99
34.45
38.11
19.71
51.73
14.55
16.94
6.42
29.47
26.68
43.85
1.86
RANK:
260th
91st
79th
204th
109th
268th
302nd
335th
338th
309th
163rd
239th
332nd
7th
81st
342nd
42nd
37th
88th
343rd
174th
9th
5th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
102.36
69.14
32.58
--
78.27
34.75
44.40
30.41
9.91
32.61
18.82
7.85
41.73
29.03
16.98
58.48
10.51
10.33
3.98
38.85
24.05
37.10
2.02
RANK:
116th
270th
345th
--
7th
40th
186th
121st
88th
77th
24th
70th
301st
104th
128th
210th
108th
10th
21st
267th
80th
219th
153rd
ANALYSIS: Regardless of what the win percentage says, Texas A&M-CC isn't a very good team this year. They are ranked #185 (out of 362) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 21-12. Of the 10 schools in the Southland (average ranking 273.2), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference. With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.263 (which ranks 344th in the nation), Texas A&M-CC has faced some of the easiest opponents in all of college basketball.
If there is a strength for Texas A&M-CC this year, it's probably on the defensive end of the court. The team is rated 116th in defensive efficiency, allowing fewer than 103 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Texas A&M-CC has extremely pesky defenders that ceaselessly attempt to deny opponents ample opportunity to shoot. The club is ranked seventh in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 78.27 vs. AO. Texas A&M-CC also does a super job to deny opponents offensive rebounds and second chances. They have a rating of 10.33 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked tenth in the country), and they allow AO to convert just 4.0% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 21st) as well. If Texas A&M-CC does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's tendency to send opponents to the line too much by fouling. The squad has a rating of 32.58 in defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks 18th-worst in the country.
The offense for Texas A&M-CC, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the defense is. The team is ranked 260th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 100 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Texas A&M-CC will have a really tough time winning games when taking into consideration their shooting percentage near the basket. The team is ranked 342nd in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 51.7% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. Texas A&M-CC also needs improvement when it comes to draining the mid-range shot. The team is ranked 332nd in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 34.4% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO. If Texas A&M-CC does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's knack for obtaining second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad has a rating of 16.94 in potential points off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 37th in all of college hoops.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass, Texas A&M-CC usually performs worse than average. Texas A&M-CC is more efficient than normal 37% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.35%. In all other contests, Texas A&M-CC performs better than average 80% of the time.
Texas A&M-CC is typically better vs. teams that tend to get off more shots. Against foes that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 84.63, Texas A&M-CC performs above their norm 80% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 37% of the time.
When facing teams that find ways to get to the free throw line, Texas A&M-CC often performs worse than normal. Texas A&M-CC is more efficient than usual 37% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 26.24. In their other contests, Texas A&M-CC performs better than the norm 80% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.