Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Stanford16-16 (0.500) | Pac-12
All-Play Percentage: 0.697 (109th)
Schedule Strength: 0.663 (44th)
Record Quality: 0.145 (100th)
Avg. Season Rank: 111.11 (110th)
Pace: 67.92 (230th)
Momentum: -0.93 (225th)
Off. Momentum: 0.36 (178th)
Def. Momentum: -1.29 (233rd)
Consistency: -8.36 (85th)
Res. Consistency: -9.27 (30th)
Away From Home: 0.49 (134th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.14 (203rd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
102.40
67.88
24.41
66.40
82.42
37.49
45.49
31.64
11.21
35.42
21.07
7.88
37.38
29.70
18.41
61.97
9.14
13.92
5.35
38.39
25.57
36.04
2.02
RANK:
131st
233rd
161st
328th
237th
111th
76th
169th
137th
95th
255th
248th
194th
145th
85th
82nd
290th
124th
123rd
154th
249th
116th
167th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
95.86
67.96
22.24
--
81.89
35.17
42.95
32.68
10.32
31.58
21.09
8.35
39.61
28.12
16.50
58.68
12.66
8.92
2.96
39.91
25.75
34.34
2.06
RANK:
88th
131st
105th
--
93rd
122nd
150th
245th
152nd
62nd
81st
142nd
264th
145th
163rd
167th
299th
4th
7th
265th
95th
172nd
118th
ANALYSIS: They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Stanford, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. Their record this season is 16-16, and the club is ranked 109th overall (out of 358) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #8 team (out of 12) in the Pac-12 (average ranking 92.8).
The primary strength for Stanford is defense. The team is ranked 88th in efficiency, allowing fewer than 96 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Stanford does a super job to deny opponents offensive rebounds and second chances. They have a rating of 8.92 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked fourth in the country), and they allow AO to convert just 3.0% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked seventh) as well. Stanford also owns a pretty good track record against teams that shoot the three. They rank 62nd in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 31.6% of their attempts from afar.
Stanford plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 131st nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 102 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Stanford has been fairly successful when shooting from the field. The squad is ranked 76th in the country in field goal percentage, making approximately 45.5% of their attempts vs. AO. If Stanford does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's poor shooting at the line. The squad makes just 66.4% of their free throw attempts, which ranks 31st-worst in Division I.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Stanford does better vs. clubs that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.77%, Stanford performs above average 65% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 25% of the time.
Stanford performs better against squads that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. When facing teams that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 39.19%, Stanford is more efficient than normal 73% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 38% of the time.
When playing teams that convert well from the charity stripe, Stanford usually performs worse than average. Stanford is more efficient than normal 27% of the time when facing clubs that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 0.74%. In all other contests, Stanford performs better than average 62% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
South Carolina still No. 1 despite SEC title defeat (3/7/2022 1:30:59 PM) South Carolina is still the AP's top team despite an upset loss to Kentucky in the SEC championship game. Stanford and NC State round out the top three.
No. 2 Arizona pulls away late for win over Stanford (3/4/2022 5:40:40 AM) Arizona had to rebound from the mental rush of winning the Pac-12 regular-season title against Southern California two nights earlier.
No. 2 Arizona pulls away late for 81-69 win over Stanford (3/4/2022 12:20:02 AM) Arizona had to rebound from the mental rush of winning the Pac-12 regular-season title against Southern California two nights earlier. The physical toll of long travel delays was an even tougher challenge, causing a sluggish start against a hungry opponent.
Shepherd scores 28 points, leads Cal over Stanford 53-39 (2/26/2022 11:01:32 PM) Jordan Shepherd scored 19 of his 28 points in the first half and California beat rival Stanford 53-39 on Saturday night. Cal (12-17, 5-13 Pac-12) ended its seven-game home losing streak while Stanford (15-13, 8-10) has lost three straight and five of its last…
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.
