TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 Kennesaw State  10-22 (0.313)  |  Atlantic Sun
All-Play Percentage: 0.017 (345th)
Schedule Strength: 0.393 (289th)
Record Quality: -0.325 (316th)
Avg. Season Rank: 337.90 (341st)
Pace: 67.20 (84th)
Momentum: -3.59 (317th)
Off. Momentum: -1.48 (298th)
Def. Momentum: -2.11 (261st)
Consistency: -12.00 (347th)
Res. Consistency: -17.52 (349th)
Away From Home: -0.12 (179th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.69 (335th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 86.59 22.12 72.40 80.48 37.94 29.64 32.06 22.13 30.06 28.72 50.08 9.92 14.71 6.68 36.83 27.49 35.68 2.01
RANK: 343rd 344th 73rd 240th 334th 110th 277th 285th 336th 156th 337th 261st 203rd 175th 93rd 280th 132nd 207th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 111.33 30.32 -- 86.06 46.28 28.80 34.99 24.03 45.84 33.23 56.39 13.48 18.52 8.24 33.47 27.92 38.61 1.95
RANK: 334th 228th -- 326th 297th 217th 193rd 118th 351st 322nd 97th 320th 336th 298th 141st 67th 302nd 269th

ANALYSIS:
There are very few Division I teams that are as bad as Kennesaw State is this year. Haslametrics has them ranked seventh from the bottom overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 10-22. Of the eight schools in the Atlantic Sun (average ranking 260.8), they're currently ranked as the worst team in the conference.

Kennesaw State has one of the most anemic offenses around. They rank ninth from the bottom in efficiency on that end of the court and score fewer than 87 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Kennesaw State does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 22.12 vs. AO, they are eighth from the bottom in the overall rankings for that category. Kennesaw State also shoots dreadfully from the floor and ranks in the bottom-25 in three of our four major field goal shooting categories. They are worse off shooting inside the three-point stripe, making good on just 30.1% of their mid-range jumpers (336th in the nation), 50.1% of their near-proximity chances (337th), and 37.9% of their total shots from the field (334th) vs. AO.

Kennesaw State doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 111 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #334 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Kennesaw State performs really badly when attempting to stop opponents from making mid-range jumpers. The squad is ranked last nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 45.8% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor. Kennesaw State also gives up far too many offensive rebounds and second chances to their opponents. The club has a rating of 18.52 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (336th nationally). Kennesaw State lastly struggles on occasion to deny opponents opportunities to shoot from the floor. The team is ranked 326th in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 86.06 vs. AO.

Kennesaw State has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 317th in the country in positive momentum. Kennesaw State has also been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked fifth from the bottom overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Kennesaw State performs better against squads that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. When facing teams that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 15.29, Kennesaw State is more efficient than normal 71% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 11% of the time.
When playing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, Kennesaw State usually performs worse than average. Kennesaw State is more efficient than normal 18% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 58.54%. In all other contests, Kennesaw State performs better than average 74% of the time.
Kennesaw State is typically better vs. teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. Against foes that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 7.90%, Kennesaw State performs above their norm 83% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 33% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox