Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 DePaul 9-23 (0.281) | Big East

All-Play Percentage: 0.506 (174^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.675 (61^st)	Record Quality: -0.112 (225^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 169.45 (167^th)
Pace: 69.80 (206^th)	Momentum: 0.72 (138^th)	Off. Momentum: 0.97 (160^th)	Def. Momentum: -0.26 (153^rd)
Consistency: -10.62 (329^th)	Res. Consistency: -12.98 (279^th)	Away From Home: -2.48 (336^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -3.76 (334^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

99.72

27.87

73.52

80.36

43.67

25.65

35.26

25.58

34.69

29.13

58.96

12.18

15.73

7.38

31.91

31.84

36.25

1.96

RANK:

193^rd

156^th

79^th

247^th

181^st

298^th

163^rd

104^th

257^th

132^nd

186^th

81^st

106^th

101^st

286^th

95^th

115^th

65^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

101.71

28.96

78.69

44.44

30.88

34.08

21.69

35.76

26.11

63.90

10.44

13.50

6.49

39.25

27.57

33.18

2.06

RANK:

158^th

225^th

48^th

174^th

240^th

104^th

102^nd

119^th

83^rd

280^th

143^rd

107^th

150^th

291^st

122^nd

121^st

75^th

ANALYSIS:
DePaul is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. Their record this season is 9-23, and the club is ranked 174th overall (out of 351) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of 10) in the Big East (average ranking 56.5).

If there is a strength for DePaul this year, it's probably on the defensive end of the court. The team is rated 158th in defensive efficiency, allowing fewer than 102 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. DePaul does a really good job to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 48th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 78.69 vs. AO.

DePaul is not quite as good on the offensive end of the floor. The team is ranked 193rd in offensive efficiency, scoring about 100 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. DePaul has some difficulties converting mid-range shot attempts. The team is ranked 257th in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 34.7% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO.

DePaul has been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked 329th overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict. On the road, DePaul performs noticeably worse than they do at home. The team is currently ranked 336th in the country in the away-from-home metric we track.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Sun 11/13/2016	vs Robert Morris₂₇₃	W 70.25 - 60.52	W 78-72	1-0	97.32	103.19	▲ 5.87	87.52	99.51	▼ 11.99	▼ 6.12
Thu 11/17/2016	vs Rutgers₁₂₂	W 65.42 - 65.28	L 59-66	1-1	93.55	86.31	▼ 7.24	97.03	108.77	▼ 11.74	▼ 18.98
Sun 11/20/2016	vs Milwaukee₂₆₄	W 68.49 - 60.41	W 77-59	2-1	104.33	129.86	▲ 25.53	95.83	92.96	▲ 2.87	▲ 28.40
Wed 11/23/2016	vs Missouri State₁₃₀	W 70.11 - 69.48	W 68-66	3-1	100.15	90.94	▼ 9.21	102.20	93.88	▲ 8.32	▼ 0.89
Wed 11/30/2016	vs Drake₂₅₁	W 76.69 - 68.38	W 77-75	4-1	106.47	106.24	▼ 0.23	98.41	106.38	▼ 7.97	▼ 8.20
Sat 12/3/2016	@ Northwestern₃₃	L 59.67 - 76.14	L 64-80	4-2	90.88	49.83	▼ 41.05	109.69	135.88	▼ 26.19	▼ 67.24
Tue 12/6/2016	vs Lamar₂₄₂	W 74.45 - 66.94	W 80-61	5-2	104.70	115.91	▲ 11.21	97.91	91.97	▲ 5.94	▲ 17.15
Sat 12/10/2016	vs Temple₁₀₈ *	L 67.52 - 71.92	L 65-74	5-3	98.57	84.42	▼ 14.15	104.03	96.10	▲ 7.93	▼ 6.22
Wed 12/14/2016	vs UIC₂₃₁	W 76.48 - 69.16	L 75-80	5-4	102.66	100.52	▼ 2.14	96.59	110.32	▼ 13.73	▼ 15.87
Sat 12/17/2016	vs Chicago State₃₃₄	W 76.42 - 59.76	W 109-61	6-4	108.19	156.76	▲ 48.57	88.10	58.63	▲ 29.47	▲ 78.04
Mon 12/19/2016	vs SE Missouri St.₂₂₉	W 74.78 - 67.80	W 81-78	7-4	104.31	115.18	▲ 10.87	98.44	115.26	▼ 16.82	▼ 5.95
Thu 12/22/2016	vs Wyoming₁₁₆ *	L 71.72 - 75.24	L 58-72	7-5	96.86	76.32	▼ 20.54	101.73	90.91	▲ 10.82	▼ 9.72
Fri 12/23/2016	vs Missouri State₁₃₀ *	L 68.59 - 70.99	L 58-69	7-6	100.15	73.42	▼ 26.73	102.20	75.82	▲ 26.38	▼ 0.35
Wed 12/28/2016	@ Villanova₁	L 55.12 - 81.25	L 65-68	7-7	86.32	99.23	▲ 12.91	120.01	100.81	▲ 19.20	▲ 32.11
Sun 1/1/2017	vs St. John's₉₀	L 73.60 - 76.81	L 73-79	7-8	97.68	102.26	▲ 4.58	105.79	118.39	▼ 12.60	▼ 8.02
Sat 1/7/2017	@ Seton Hall₅₃	L 61.61 - 75.53	L 56-87	7-9	91.35	69.52	▼ 21.83	106.58	126.63	▼ 20.05	▼ 41.88
Tue 1/10/2017	vs Providence₆₃	L 63.77 - 70.36	W 64-63	8-9	91.49	91.90	▲ 0.41	104.76	89.36	▲ 15.40	▲ 15.81
Sat 1/14/2017	@ Marquette₃₂	L 67.73 - 85.20	L 58-83	8-10	97.73	86.53	▼ 11.20	116.99	135.04	▼ 18.05	▼ 29.25
Mon 1/16/2017	@ St. John's₉₀	L 70.34 - 80.10	L 68-78	8-11	97.68	96.25	▼ 1.43	105.79	112.94	▼ 7.15	▼ 8.58
Sat 1/21/2017	vs Butler₂₅	L 63.35 - 76.29	L 69-70 (OT)	8-12	92.60	91.44	▼ 1.16	115.21	95.87	▲ 19.34	▲ 18.18
Sat 1/28/2017	@ Creighton₂₉	L 64.57 - 83.64	L 66-83	8-13	91.99	93.39	▲ 1.40	112.94	112.49	▲ 0.45	▲ 1.85
Tue 1/31/2017	vs Georgetown₆₀	L 67.01 - 74.04	L 73-76	8-14	93.21	99.17	▲ 5.96	106.58	107.77	▼ 1.19	▲ 4.77
Sat 2/4/2017	vs Marquette₃₂	L 70.86 - 81.92	L 79-92	8-15	97.73	119.32	▲ 21.59	116.99	140.09	▼ 23.10	▼ 1.51
Wed 2/8/2017	@ Xavier₃₈	L 63.12 - 79.12	L 61-72	8-16	93.73	85.55	▼ 8.18	111.73	105.48	▲ 6.25	▼ 1.93
Sat 2/11/2017	vs Creighton₂₉	L 67.74 - 80.51	L 58-93	8-17	91.99	77.45	▼ 14.54	112.94	127.22	▼ 14.28	▼ 28.82
Mon 2/13/2017	vs Villanova₁	L 58.01 - 78.17	L 62-75	8-18	86.32	67.14	▼ 19.18	120.01	107.05	▲ 12.96	▼ 6.22
Sun 2/19/2017	@ Butler₂₅	L 60.39 - 79.34	L 66-82	8-19	92.60	92.78	▲ 0.18	115.21	135.52	▼ 20.31	▼ 20.13
Wed 2/22/2017	@ Georgetown₆₀	L 63.91 - 77.21	W 67-65	9-19	93.21	106.90	▲ 13.69	106.58	99.35	▲ 7.23	▲ 20.92
Sat 2/25/2017	vs Seton Hall₅₃	L 64.66 - 72.62	L 79-82	9-20	91.35	107.51	▲ 16.16	106.58	116.10	▼ 9.52	▲ 6.64
Tue 2/28/2017	@ Providence₆₃	L 60.77 - 73.33	L 64-73	9-21	91.49	82.22	▼ 9.27	104.76	97.78	▲ 6.98	▼ 2.29
Sat 3/4/2017	vs Xavier₃₈	L 66.17 - 76.13	L 65-79	9-22	93.73	91.63	▼ 2.10	111.73	118.88	▼ 7.15	▼ 9.25
Wed 3/8/2017	vs Xavier₃₈ *	L 64.64 - 77.62	L 64-75	9-23	93.73	94.12	▲ 0.39	111.73	110.29	▲ 1.44	▲ 1.83
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	DePaul does worse vs. clubs that favor a faster tempo. When playing squads that have a pace vs. AO greater than 71.01, DePaul performs above average 20% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 59% of the time.
	DePaul performs worse against squads that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. When facing teams that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 14.35, DePaul is more efficient than normal 20% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 59% of the time.
	When playing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, DePaul usually performs better than average. DePaul is more efficient than normal 70% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 7.28%. In all other contests, DePaul performs better than average 36% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox