Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Jacksonville13-16 (0.448) | Atlantic Sun
All-Play Percentage: 0.401 (218th)
Schedule Strength: 0.423 (206th)
Record Quality: -0.131 (249th)
Avg. Season Rank: 194.32 (194th)
Pace: 62.87 (360th)
Momentum: -0.10 (182nd)
Off. Momentum: -1.55 (306th)
Def. Momentum: 1.45 (57th)
Consistency: -10.00 (276th)
Res. Consistency: -13.67 (283rd)
Away From Home: 0.13 (95th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.91 (267th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
98.43
62.78
20.24
77.19
83.50
36.05
43.17
32.11
10.71
33.36
26.84
11.80
43.98
24.55
13.53
55.11
9.13
9.85
3.71
38.45
32.14
29.40
2.09
RANK:
265th
361st
352nd
23rd
228th
226th
214th
144th
169th
213th
87th
22nd
9th
345th
349th
289th
274th
344th
333rd
123rd
75th
343rd
316th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
102.72
62.97
23.48
--
87.33
36.70
42.02
39.23
12.28
31.30
23.39
9.26
39.61
24.71
15.15
61.33
13.11
13.89
3.91
44.93
26.78
28.29
2.17
RANK:
174th
5th
108th
--
300th
150th
80th
357th
327th
43rd
171st
208th
255th
21st
52nd
266th
336th
188th
24th
353rd
127th
8th
8th
ANALYSIS: Jacksonville has a squad that most likely falls somewhere in the bottom half of NCAA Division I teams this year. Ranked 218th overall (out of 363) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 13-16. They are also ranked by this site as the #8 team (out of 14) in the Atlantic Sun (average ranking 209.1).
If there is a strength for Jacksonville this year, it's probably on the defensive end of the court. While preferring an extremely deliberate pace (the fourth-slowest in D1), the team is rated 174th in defensive efficiency, allowing fewer than 103 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Jacksonville does a fantastic job to prevent opposing teams from capitalizing on chances from offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 3.9% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 24th in the NCAA). Jacksonville has also done a very good job to prevent opponents from draining threes this year. They rank 43rd in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 31.3% of their attempts from afar. And to expose that weakness, this team will force AO to shoot the three more than they usually would. Of AO's total field goals, a large chunk of them (44.9%) will come from long-distance.
Jacksonville doesn't perform as well offensively as they do defensively. The team is ranked 265th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 98 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Jacksonville does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 20.24 vs. AO, they are 352nd in the overall rankings for that category. Jacksonville also poses no threat whatsoever to grab rebounds off their own misses. Against AO, the ball-club has a rating of 9.85 in potential points scored off of second chances (344th nationally), and they convert just 3.7% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 333rd) as well. If Jacksonville does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to successfully hit from mid-range locations on the court. The team makes 44.0% of their in-between field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks ninth in the NCAA.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Jacksonville does worse vs. clubs that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. When playing squads that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 36.32%, Jacksonville performs above average 18% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 89% of the time.
Jacksonville performs worse against squads that shoot the ball well from the field. When facing teams that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 42.60%, Jacksonville is more efficient than normal 22% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 88% of the time.
When playing teams that are typically efficient on offense, Jacksonville usually performs worse than average. Jacksonville is more efficient than normal 14% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 102.86. In all other contests, Jacksonville performs better than average 75% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.