Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 UT Rio Grande 10-22 (0.313) | WAC

All-Play Percentage: 0.143 (300^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.441 (231^st)	Record Quality: -0.301 (317^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 302.11 (306^th)
Pace: 76.17 (5^th)	Momentum: -2.62 (281^st)	Off. Momentum: 0.29 (193^rd)	Def. Momentum: -2.91 (306^th)
Consistency: -9.65 (269^th)	Res. Consistency: -9.61 (66^th)	Away From Home: -0.28 (182^nd)	Paper Tiger Factor: -1.27 (205^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

96.25

23.73

73.36

82.29

41.55

31.63

33.02

25.57

35.78

25.09

58.20

13.73

12.92

6.69

38.44

31.08

30.49

2.08

RANK:

260^th

307^th

84^th

146^th

279^th

101^st

273^rd

106^th

206^th

301^st

212^th

30^th

261^st

158^th

116^th

113^th

306^th

286^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

110.15

36.82

76.66

48.79

26.23

38.79

16.47

38.22

33.96

61.63

12.02

15.12

8.14

34.22

21.48

44.30

1.90

RANK:

307^th

350^th

16^th

333^rd

41^st

321^st

4^th

241^st

336^th

221^st

269^th

221^st

296^th

96^th

4^th

350^th

337^th

ANALYSIS:
Not one of the better ball-clubs in college basketball, UT Rio Grande should be a fairly easy win for most capable opponents. Ranked 300th overall (out of 351) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 10-22. They are also ranked by this site as the #7 team (out of eight) in the WAC (average ranking 208.0).

UT Rio Grande does not provide much of a challenge on defense. They are ranked at #307 in efficiency on that end of the court and give up about 110 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. UT Rio Grande fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 36.82 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #350 in the country in that category. UT Rio Grande is also one of the very worst teams in the country in terms of overall defensive field goal percentage. The ball-club ranks #333 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 48.8% of their total attempts from the floor. If UT Rio Grande does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to limit the number of shot attempts by the opposition. The team has a defensive field goal attempt rate of 76.66 vs. AO, which ranks 16th-best in college basketball.

UT Rio Grande doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 96 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #260 in the nation in offensive efficiency. UT Rio Grande struggles to draw fouls and earn opportunities at the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 23.73 vs. AO, they are 307th in the overall rankings for that category.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Sun 11/13/2016	@ UT Martin₂₂₄	L 76.38 - 85.94	L 80-88	0-1	100.84	104.88	▲ 4.04	108.30	112.26	▼ 3.96	▲ 0.08
Mon 11/14/2016	@ Memphis₁₀₀	L 69.79 - 88.67	L 75-94	0-2	93.88	85.33	▼ 8.55	113.79	109.32	▲ 4.47	▼ 4.08
Wed 11/16/2016	vs Texas A&M-CC₁₈₉	L 76.05 - 81.78	L 72-94	0-3	96.92	82.72	▼ 14.20	108.63	115.73	▼ 7.10	▼ 21.30
Sun 11/20/2016	@ Iowa₆₂	L 71.61 - 96.47	L 67-95	0-4	92.97	67.89	▼ 25.08	119.60	108.23	▲ 11.37	▼ 13.71
Tue 11/22/2016	@ SE Missouri St.₂₂₉	L 75.65 - 85.12	L 72-83	0-5	100.83	102.22	▲ 1.39	108.77	114.69	▼ 5.92	▼ 4.53
Fri 11/25/2016	vs Grambling₃₃₇ *	W 80.38 - 74.33	W 101-93 (OT)	1-5	106.86	115.79	▲ 8.93	98.78	111.39	▼ 12.61	▼ 3.68
Sat 11/26/2016	vs St. Francis (BKN)₃₄₇ *	W 80.38 - 69.37	W 71-61	2-5	105.88	95.95	▼ 9.93	91.70	85.92	▲ 5.78	▼ 4.15
Tue 11/29/2016	@ Texas A&M-CC₁₈₉	L 72.68 - 85.14	L 68-84	2-6	96.92	91.69	▼ 5.23	108.63	104.28	▲ 4.35	▼ 0.88
Sat 12/3/2016	@ Portland State₂₁₄	L 79.10 - 89.10	L 74-87	2-7	102.19	100.72	▼ 1.47	110.33	123.16	▼ 12.83	▼ 14.30
Mon 12/5/2016	@ Portland₂₈₆	L 73.23 - 78.63	L 89-90 (2OT)	2-8	101.01	97.02	▼ 3.99	104.19	92.59	▲ 11.60	▲ 7.61
Wed 12/7/2016	vs Texas State₁₆₀	L 67.76 - 74.82	W 72-61	3-8	92.41	103.67	▲ 11.26	106.19	93.26	▲ 12.93	▲ 24.19
Mon 12/12/2016	vs North Florida₂₆₈	W 81.80 - 81.39	W 98-84	4-8	103.53	120.45	▲ 16.92	107.22	98.22	▲ 9.00	▲ 25.92
Fri 12/16/2016	vs Lamar₂₄₂	L 78.74 - 80.44	W 95-81	5-8	101.22	114.45	▲ 13.23	107.79	102.22	▲ 5.57	▲ 18.80
Sat 12/17/2016	@ Houston₄₇	L 64.54 - 90.41	L 58-83	5-9	89.83	81.85	▼ 7.98	120.05	126.88	▼ 6.83	▼ 14.81
Wed 12/21/2016	vs Wayland	---	W 86-55	6-9	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Thu 12/29/2016	vs Lady of the Lake	---	W 97-81	7-9	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 12/31/2016	vs Texas A&M-K'vil	---	W 96-78	8-9	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Thu 1/5/2017	@ Chicago State₃₃₄	W 77.61 - 76.14	W 83-64	9-9	104.72	104.78	▲ 0.06	98.28	78.30	▲ 19.98	▲ 20.04
Sat 1/7/2017	@ UMKC₂₃₇	L 76.74 - 85.79	L 79-83	9-10	100.05	104.81	▲ 4.76	107.07	102.85	▲ 4.22	▲ 8.98
Thu 1/12/2017	vs CSU Bakersfield₉₉	L 66.91 - 78.59	L 81-88	9-11	86.27	107.24	▲ 20.97	105.78	122.76	▼ 16.98	▲ 3.99
Sat 1/14/2017	vs Grand Canyon₁₆₄	L 73.85 - 81.20	L 66-79	9-12	93.20	83.12	▼ 10.08	107.01	106.22	▲ 0.79	▼ 9.29
Sat 1/21/2017	vs Chicago State₃₃₄	W 80.96 - 72.83	W 85-77 (OT)	10-12	104.72	91.12	▼ 13.60	98.28	96.81	▲ 1.47	▼ 12.13
Thu 1/26/2017	@ Utah Valley₁₆₈	L 73.82 - 88.67	L 81-92	10-13	93.45	93.23	▼ 0.22	107.23	98.88	▲ 8.35	▲ 8.13
Sat 1/28/2017	@ Seattle₂₆₉	L 70.86 - 77.33	L 84-96	10-14	96.55	113.90	▲ 17.35	101.28	124.10	▼ 22.82	▼ 5.47
Sat 2/4/2017	vs UMKC₂₃₇	L 80.19 - 82.39	L 60-73	10-15	100.05	84.74	▼ 15.31	107.07	108.01	▼ 0.94	▼ 16.25
Thu 2/9/2017	@ Grand Canyon₁₆₄	L 70.45 - 84.46	L 57-76	10-16	93.20	76.54	▼ 16.66	107.01	97.78	▲ 9.23	▼ 7.43
Sat 2/11/2017	@ CSU Bakersfield₉₉	L 63.59 - 81.74	L 53-75	10-17	86.27	65.85	▼ 20.42	105.78	97.78	▲ 8.00	▼ 12.42
Sat 2/18/2017	vs New Mexico St.₉₃	L 73.57 - 86.64	L 101-107	10-18	94.98	125.63	▲ 30.65	116.22	137.66	▼ 21.44	▲ 9.21
Thu 2/23/2017	vs Seattle₂₆₉	W 74.16 - 74.12	L 77-86	10-19	96.55	102.01	▲ 5.46	101.28	121.66	▼ 20.38	▼ 14.92
Sat 2/25/2017	vs Utah Valley₁₆₈	L 77.37 - 85.13	L 68-88	10-20	93.45	87.78	▼ 5.67	107.23	120.53	▼ 13.30	▼ 18.97
Sat 3/4/2017	@ New Mexico St.₉₃	L 70.24 - 89.96	L 81-107	10-21	94.98	105.11	▲ 10.13	116.22	136.91	▼ 20.69	▼ 10.56
Thu 3/9/2017	vs UMKC₂₃₇ *	L 78.46 - 84.09	L 78-82 (OT)	10-22	100.05	83.75	▼ 16.30	107.07	84.81	▲ 22.26	▲ 5.96
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	UT Rio Grande is typically better vs. teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 14.37, UT Rio Grande performs above their norm 55% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 11% of the time.
	When facing teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass, UT Rio Grande often performs better than normal. UT Rio Grande is more efficient than usual 59% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.59%. In their other contests, UT Rio Grande performs better than the norm 17% of the time.
	UT Rio Grande does worse vs. clubs that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. When playing squads that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 11.63, UT Rio Grande performs above average 18% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 56% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox