TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Lipscomb  20-13 (0.606)  |  Atlantic Sun
All-Play Percentage: 0.580 (153rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.388 (245th)
Record Quality: 0.019 (162nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 188.51 (185th)
Pace: 69.29 (97th)
Momentum: 1.28 (109th)
Off. Momentum: 2.77 (58th)
Def. Momentum: -1.49 (223rd)
Consistency: -9.35 (202nd)
Res. Consistency: -10.87 (103rd)
Away From Home: -0.94 (218th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.39 (69th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.86 19.73 76.14 84.79 45.28 31.31 35.28 21.03 37.20 32.44 60.18 8.54 11.20 4.90 36.93 24.80 38.26 1.99
RANK: 171st 356th 37th 172nd 99th 176th 108th 275th 211th 68th 130th 300th 313th 224th 180th 279th 61st 110th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.63 21.55 -- 87.75 43.48 31.08 32.65 25.41 37.32 31.27 59.26 12.40 13.31 5.30 35.42 28.95 35.63 2.00
RANK: 165th 45th -- 313th 150th 184th 103rd 253rd 163rd 261st 198th 300th 130th 183rd 122nd 222nd 208th 228th

ANALYSIS:
Per this website's calculations, Lipscomb is somewhere between an average to slightly above-average D1 ball-club. Haslametrics has them ranked 153rd overall (out of 363) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 20-13. They are also ranked by this site as the #4 team (out of 14) in the Atlantic Sun (average ranking 209.1).

If there is a strength for Lipscomb this year, it's probably on the defensive end of the court. The team is rated 165th in defensive efficiency, allowing fewer than 103 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Lipscomb does a pretty solid job avoiding careless fouls and minimizing opponents' opportunities from the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 21.55 vs. AO, they are currently rated 45th in the country in that category.

Lipscomb plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 171st nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 103 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Lipscomb does a really good job converting from the free throw line. Making 76.1% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 37th nationally in free throw percentage. Though they typically convert their shots from the line, the downside is that they hardly ever manage to get there. The squad has a free throw attempt rate of 19.73 vs. AO (eighth-worst in the nation). Lipscomb also makes an effort to get off shots from the inside more so than the perimeter. The ball-club is 61st in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. As far as converting those near-proximity shots goes, the team shoots 60.2% vs. AO, which falls somewhere in the middle of the pack of the rankings in that category.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Lipscomb does better vs. clubs that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When playing squads that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 55.43%, Lipscomb performs above average 70% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 20% of the time.
Lipscomb performs better against squads that tend to get off more shots. When facing teams that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 84.92, Lipscomb is more efficient than normal 79% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 31% of the time.
When playing teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass, Lipscomb usually performs better than average. Lipscomb is more efficient than normal 67% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.35%. In all other contests, Lipscomb performs better than average 22% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox