Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 Lipscomb 20-13 (0.606) | Atlantic Sun

All-Play Percentage: 0.514 (171^st)	Schedule Strength: 0.404 (270^th)	Record Quality: -0.012 (185^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 197.20 (200^th)
Pace: 76.01 (6^th)	Momentum: 1.18 (110^th)	Off. Momentum: 1.40 (127^th)	Def. Momentum: -0.22 (148^th)
Consistency: -9.37 (227^th)	Res. Consistency: -11.41 (176^th)	Away From Home: -0.32 (185^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -0.66 (143^rd)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

102.47

28.06

72.28

77.91

44.65

35.44

35.59

14.28

33.03

28.19

61.93

11.77

14.14

6.09

45.49

18.33

36.18

2.09

RANK:

148^th

142^nd

116^th

330^th

134^th

22^nd

151^st

347^th

310^th

191^st

95^th

107^th

201^st

228^th

10^th

345^th

120^th

301^st

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

103.35

33.34

77.07

46.10

25.04

37.15

22.75

38.28

29.28

59.84

12.84

16.96

8.30

32.49

29.52

37.99

1.95

RANK:

191^st

335^th

22^nd

253^rd

21^st

272^nd

137^th

247^th

209^th

161^st

313^th

320^th

303^rd

44^th

201^st

281^st

306^th

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, Lipscomb should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. They have a record of 20-13 and are ranked 171st overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the eight schools in the Atlantic Sun (average ranking 242.4), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference.

If there is a strength for Lipscomb this year, it's probably on the offensive end of the court. While favoring one of the game's most blistering paces (the sixth-fastest in D1), the team is rated 148th in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 102 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Lipscomb lives and dies by the three-ball and will launch from long-distance early and often. The team ranks tenth in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. When it comes to actually making their three-point attempts, the squad shoots a so-so 35.6% from beyond the arc vs. AO. If Lipscomb does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties in getting off a sufficient number of shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of just 77.91 vs. AO, which ranks 22nd-worst in college basketball.

Lipscomb is not quite as good on the defensive end of the floor. The team is ranked 191st in defensive efficiency, allowing about 103 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Lipscomb fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 33.34 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #335 in the country in that category. Lipscomb also can be weak on rebounding, giving the opposition too many chances to score off of the offensive glass. The club has a rating of 16.96 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (320th nationally), and they let AO convert a healthy 8.3% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 303rd) as well. If Lipscomb does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to limit the number of shot attempts by the opposition. The team has a defensive field goal attempt rate of 77.07 vs. AO, which ranks 22nd-best in college basketball.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Fri 11/11/2016	vs Sewanee	---	W 96-53	1-0	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sun 11/13/2016	@ Morehead State₂₀₄	L 80.85 - 81.66	L 75-89	1-1	108.37	100.90	▼ 7.47	105.33	112.26	▼ 6.93	▼ 14.40
Tue 11/15/2016	vs Piedmont	---	W 99-70	2-1	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Fri 11/18/2016	vs St. Peter's₁₂₅ *	L 68.50 - 70.74	L 77-90	2-2	97.66	77.32	▼ 20.34	100.72	96.67	▲ 4.05	▼ 16.29
Sat 11/19/2016	vs Fair. Dickinson₂₆₃ *	W 86.03 - 79.37	L 72-90	2-3	111.17	90.28	▼ 20.89	103.15	113.89	▼ 10.74	▼ 31.63
Sun 11/20/2016	@ Fordham₁₈₅	L 70.43 - 72.68	L 69-85	2-4	98.98	89.36	▼ 9.62	97.90	107.64	▼ 9.74	▼ 19.36
Sat 11/26/2016	@ Cincinnati₁₆	L 62.99 - 84.87	L 68-91	2-5	90.02	97.45	▲ 7.43	115.54	127.47	▼ 11.93	▼ 4.50
Tue 11/29/2016	@ Belmont₈₆	L 74.91 - 85.57	L 62-64	2-6	101.24	87.15	▼ 14.09	110.77	85.46	▲ 25.31	▲ 11.22
Thu 12/1/2016	vs Tenn. Tech₂₅₃	W 82.07 - 72.79	W 104-85	3-6	105.16	121.11	▲ 15.95	97.08	102.69	▼ 5.61	▲ 10.34
Sat 12/3/2016	vs Tennessee St.₁₃₃	W 75.20 - 73.80	L 71-72	3-7	97.68	97.78	▲ 0.10	99.78	100.85	▼ 1.07	▼ 0.97
Tue 12/6/2016	vs Belmont₈₆	L 78.23 - 82.10	L 76-78 (OT)	3-8	101.24	90.64	▼ 10.60	110.77	92.49	▲ 18.28	▲ 7.68
Sat 12/10/2016	vs Morehead State₂₀₄	W 84.19 - 78.32	W 98-84	4-8	108.37	118.04	▲ 9.67	105.33	108.71	▼ 3.38	▲ 6.29
Thu 12/15/2016	@ Tennessee₅₁	L 71.02 - 86.65	L 77-92	4-9	94.42	110.67	▲ 16.25	110.09	123.81	▼ 13.72	▲ 2.53
Sat 12/17/2016	@ Tenn. Tech₂₅₃	W 78.71 - 76.11	W 81-79	5-9	105.16	99.81	▼ 5.35	97.08	94.13	▲ 2.95	▼ 2.40
Tue 12/20/2016	@ Austin Peay₂₉₆	W 87.92 - 81.58	W 99-85	6-9	115.99	131.55	▲ 15.56	103.60	111.12	▼ 7.52	▲ 8.04
Thu 12/29/2016	@ Missouri₁₅₅	L 74.43 - 78.71	W 81-76	7-9	99.23	107.41	▲ 8.18	100.88	96.49	▲ 4.39	▲ 12.57
Thu 1/5/2017	vs Fisk	---	W 126-43	8-9	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 1/7/2017	vs Kennesaw State₂₆₆	W 86.50 - 76.03	W 82-79	9-9	109.74	100.28	▼ 9.46	100.68	98.56	▲ 2.12	▼ 7.34
Thu 1/12/2017	vs Stetson₃₂₀	W 92.50 - 76.06	W 94-68	10-9	113.89	122.35	▲ 8.46	97.61	72.91	▲ 24.70	▲ 33.16
Sat 1/14/2017	vs FGCU₁₀₉	L 77.61 - 78.61	L 80-84	10-10	102.48	99.05	▼ 3.43	107.57	108.54	▼ 0.97	▼ 4.40
Thu 1/19/2017	@ Jacksonville₂₈₈	W 83.05 - 78.01	W 112-95	11-10	111.65	123.33	▲ 11.68	101.03	103.34	▼ 2.31	▲ 9.37
Sat 1/21/2017	@ North Florida₂₆₈	W 83.12 - 79.04	L 84-90	11-11	109.73	107.22	▼ 2.51	100.35	110.28	▼ 9.93	▼ 12.44
Wed 1/25/2017	vs USC Upstate₂₃₉	W 84.85 - 76.68	W 84-77	12-11	109.14	116.09	▲ 6.95	102.79	109.16	▼ 6.37	▲ 0.58
Sat 1/28/2017	@ NJIT₂₇₈	W 79.65 - 75.10	W 66-62	13-11	107.40	95.17	▼ 12.23	97.19	83.90	▲ 13.29	▲ 1.06
Mon 1/30/2017	@ USC Upstate₂₃₉	W 81.50 - 79.92	W 92-80	14-11	109.14	120.02	▲ 10.88	102.79	100.56	▲ 2.23	▲ 13.11
Sat 2/4/2017	vs NJIT₂₇₈	W 82.98 - 71.84	W 87-63	15-11	107.40	123.21	▲ 15.81	97.19	90.35	▲ 6.84	▲ 22.65
Thu 2/9/2017	@ FGCU₁₀₉	L 74.35 - 81.83	W 65-60	16-11	102.48	93.76	▼ 8.72	107.57	81.12	▲ 26.45	▲ 17.73
Sat 2/11/2017	@ Stetson₃₂₀	W 89.00 - 79.37	W 97-85	17-11	113.89	129.61	▲ 15.72	97.61	106.12	▼ 8.51	▲ 7.21
Thu 2/16/2017	vs North Florida₂₆₈	W 86.51 - 75.83	L 82-93	17-12	109.73	101.68	▼ 8.05	100.35	121.95	▼ 21.60	▼ 29.65
Sat 2/18/2017	vs Jacksonville₂₈₈	W 86.39 - 74.70	W 81-69	18-12	111.65	113.73	▲ 2.08	101.03	96.42	▲ 4.61	▲ 6.69
Thu 2/23/2017	@ Kennesaw State₂₆₆	W 83.11 - 79.36	W 85-74	19-12	109.74	131.25	▲ 21.51	100.68	87.95	▲ 12.73	▲ 34.24
Mon 2/27/2017	vs NJIT₂₇₈	W 82.98 - 71.84	W 97-66	20-12	107.40	118.75	▲ 11.35	97.19	79.26	▲ 17.93	▲ 29.28
Thu 3/2/2017	vs North Florida₂₆₈	W 86.51 - 75.83	L 85-91	20-13	109.73	97.78	▼ 11.95	100.35	131.00	▼ 30.65	▼ 42.60
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Lipscomb is typically worse vs. teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 7.25%, Lipscomb performs above their norm 20% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 70% of the time.
	When facing teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot, Lipscomb often performs better than normal. Lipscomb is more efficient than usual 82% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.39%. In their other contests, Lipscomb performs better than the norm 37% of the time.
	Lipscomb does better vs. clubs that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.83%, Lipscomb performs above average 68% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 27% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox