Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 Incarnate Word 9-22 (0.290) | Southland

All-Play Percentage: 0.034 (341^st)	Schedule Strength: 0.364 (289^th)	Record Quality: -0.418 (338^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 341.33 (341^st)
Pace: 68.03 (268^th)	Momentum: 0.57 (151^st)	Off. Momentum: 2.20 (82^nd)	Def. Momentum: -1.63 (245^th)
Consistency: -8.34 (83^rd)	Res. Consistency: -10.02 (64^th)	Away From Home: 0.72 (94^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -0.08 (111^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

88.05

19.71

75.00

81.80

39.34

29.67

30.00

24.52

35.13

27.60

53.12

10.98

9.83

4.03

36.28

29.98

33.74

2.03

RANK:

340^th

341^st

57^th

172^nd

335^th

209^th

324^th

104^th

260^th

206^th

321^st

166^th

321^st

270^th

220^th

97^th

207^th

172^nd

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

110.03

27.58

82.05

47.66

30.90

35.00

17.51

40.23

33.64

63.16

11.89

14.37

5.31

37.66

21.34

41.00

1.97

RANK:

336^th

265^th

187^th

334^th

185^th

266^th

10^th

288^th

338^th

296^th

244^th

278^th

217^th

183^rd

9^th

341^st

297^th

ANALYSIS:
Incarnate Word is not one of the better teams in Division I this year. They are ranked #341 (out of 353) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 9-22. Of the 13 schools in the Southland (average ranking 251.2), they're currently ranked as the worst team in the conference.

Incarnate Word has one of the most anemic offenses around. They rank 340th in efficiency on that end of the court and score fewer than 89 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Incarnate Word does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 19.71 vs. AO, they are 341st in the overall rankings for that category. Incarnate Word also struggles to drain shots consistently from most spots on the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four primary field goal shooting categories. They only convert 30.0% of their three-pointers (324th in the nation), 53.1% of their near-proximity attempts (321st), and 39.3% of their total shots from the field (335th) vs. AO.

Incarnate Word doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 110 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #336 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Incarnate Word is one of the very worst teams in the country in terms of overall defensive field goal percentage. The ball-club ranks #334 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 47.7% of their total attempts from the floor.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Wed 11/6/2019	@ Missouri₇₇	L 52.05 - 76.13	L 42-82	0-1	80.75	51.54	▼ 29.21	111.17	106.64	▲ 4.53	▼ 24.68
Fri 11/8/2019	@ N. Colorado₈₁	L 54.47 - 77.72	L 61-83	0-2	85.75	98.77	▲ 13.02	115.80	124.90	▼ 9.10	▲ 3.92
Tue 11/12/2019	vs TX Lutheran	---	W 86-60	1-2	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 11/16/2019	vs SIUE₃₂₆	W 66.06 - 65.79	L 55-57	1-3	94.17	78.14	▼ 16.03	98.43	84.46	▲ 13.97	▼ 2.06
Fri 11/22/2019	vs Bethune-Cookman₃₀₃	L 68.84 - 70.45	L 58-83	1-4	93.27	74.82	▼ 18.45	100.23	109.91	▼ 9.68	▼ 28.13
Sat 11/23/2019	vs St Francis (IL)	---	W 68-44	2-4	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sun 11/24/2019	vs E. Illinois₂₂₆	L 63.75 - 70.37	L 63-72	2-5	89.65	85.97	▼ 3.68	103.61	104.94	▼ 1.33	▼ 5.01
Sun 12/1/2019	@ Portland₂₈₁	L 61.07 - 71.04	L 56-65	2-6	91.83	99.00	▲ 7.17	101.47	109.14	▼ 7.67	▼ 0.50
Tue 12/3/2019	@ Seattle₂₁₈	L 60.87 - 75.29	L 60-81	2-7	90.36	80.88	▼ 9.48	105.35	127.74	▼ 22.39	▼ 31.87
Sat 12/7/2019	vs Trinity (TX)	---	W 101-65	3-7	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Wed 12/18/2019	@ Cent. Arkansas₂₉₆	L 67.02 - 76.58	L 82-88 (OT)	3-8	94.73	99.09	▲ 4.36	102.98	94.85	▲ 8.13	▲ 12.49
Sat 12/21/2019	@ Washington St.₁₂₁	L 56.61 - 78.08	L 59-87	3-9	82.97	79.08	▼ 3.89	108.69	110.53	▼ 1.84	▼ 5.73
Thu 1/2/2020	@ Nicholls₁₅₇	L 57.33 - 75.57	L 60-76	3-10	85.73	86.74	▲ 1.01	107.45	108.16	▼ 0.71	▲ 0.30
Wed 1/8/2020	vs Northwestern St.₂₇₆	L 68.82 - 72.48	L 66-72	3-11	93.72	85.26	▼ 8.46	104.13	95.78	▲ 8.35	▼ 0.11
Sat 1/11/2020	vs New Orleans₃₁₈	L 70.04 - 70.46	W 73-70	4-11	98.58	98.94	▲ 0.36	104.10	102.45	▲ 1.65	▲ 2.01
Wed 1/15/2020	@ McNeese₂₃₂	L 64.56 - 77.68	L 56-72	4-12	97.14	90.17	▼ 6.97	110.73	116.85	▼ 6.12	▼ 13.09
Sat 1/18/2020	@ Stephen F. Austin₉₆	L 56.88 - 80.22	L 56-80	4-13	81.87	79.32	▼ 2.55	110.40	102.59	▲ 7.81	▲ 5.26
Wed 1/22/2020	vs Lamar₂₂₅	L 63.14 - 69.99	L 77-89	4-14	88.76	98.98	▲ 10.22	103.16	124.98	▼ 21.82	▼ 11.60
Sat 1/25/2020	vs Texas A&M-CC₂₉₈	L 62.14 - 64.08	L 47-68	4-15	92.00	82.74	▼ 9.26	99.74	125.09	▼ 25.35	▼ 34.61
Wed 1/29/2020	@ Houston Baptist₃₃₆	L 77.57 - 81.96	W 84-82	5-15	106.09	112.97	▲ 6.88	107.39	106.89	▲ 0.50	▲ 7.38
Sat 2/1/2020	@ Abil. Christian₁₆₄	L 56.82 - 74.64	L 58-72	5-16	85.63	94.11	▲ 8.48	107.00	110.46	▼ 3.46	▲ 5.02
Wed 2/5/2020	vs Sam Houston₁₉₇	L 64.82 - 73.35	W 72-71 (OT)	6-16	90.26	90.09	▼ 0.17	107.07	94.99	▲ 12.08	▲ 11.91
Sat 2/8/2020	vs SE Louisiana₃₂₉	W 68.63 - 67.81	W 82-75 (OT)	7-16	94.42	93.33	▼ 1.09	98.49	99.59	▼ 1.10	▼ 2.19
Wed 2/12/2020	@ Northwestern St.₂₇₆	L 65.26 - 76.01	L 60-70	7-17	93.72	80.37	▼ 13.35	104.13	88.46	▲ 15.67	▲ 2.32
Sat 2/15/2020	@ New Orleans₃₁₈	L 66.59 - 73.91	W 67-66	8-17	98.58	105.52	▲ 6.94	104.10	97.55	▲ 6.55	▲ 13.49
Wed 2/19/2020	vs McNeese₂₃₂	L 67.96 - 74.24	W 65-59	9-17	97.14	98.33	▲ 1.19	110.73	91.84	▲ 18.89	▲ 20.08
Sat 2/22/2020	vs Stephen F. Austin₉₆	L 60.42 - 76.78	L 56-80	9-18	81.87	72.16	▼ 9.71	110.40	118.15	▼ 7.75	▼ 17.46
Wed 2/26/2020	@ Lamar₂₂₅	L 59.70 - 73.40	L 66-86	9-19	88.76	109.34	▲ 20.58	103.16	135.48	▼ 32.32	▼ 11.74
Sat 2/29/2020	@ Texas A&M-CC₂₉₈	L 58.86 - 67.26	L 70-78	9-20	92.00	104.24	▲ 12.24	99.74	111.70	▼ 11.96	▲ 0.28
Wed 3/4/2020	vs Houston Baptist₃₃₆	W 81.30 - 78.29	L 76-88	9-21	106.09	90.97	▼ 15.12	107.39	115.61	▼ 8.22	▼ 23.34
Sat 3/7/2020	vs Abil. Christian₁₆₄	L 60.21 - 71.22	L 68-71 (OT)	9-22	85.63	91.40	▲ 5.77	107.00	96.29	▲ 10.71	▲ 16.48
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Incarnate Word does better vs. clubs that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. When playing squads that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.04%, Incarnate Word performs above average 100% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 39% of the time.
	Incarnate Word performs better against squads that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. When facing teams that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 38.37%, Incarnate Word is more efficient than normal 74% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 33% of the time.
	When playing teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively, Incarnate Word usually performs better than average. Incarnate Word is more efficient than normal 82% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 103.56. In all other contests, Incarnate Word performs better than average 47% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Gates lifts Houston Baptist over Incarnate Word 88-76 (3/4/2020 11:15:00 PM) Get real-time COLLEGEBASKETBALL basketball coverage and scores as Houston Bap. Huskies takes on Incarnate Word Cardinals. We bring you the latest game previews, live stats, and recaps on CBSSports.com
	Atwood, Kopp, Buster combine for 66 in Lamar's 86-66 win (2/27/2020 12:18:00 AM) Get real-time COLLEGEBASKETBALL basketball coverage and scores as Incarnate Word Cardinals takes on Lamar Cardinals. We bring you the latest game previews, live stats, and recaps on CBSSports.com
	Lamar men’s basketball defeats UIW, extends winning streak (2/26/2020 11:16:00 PM) The Lamar University men’s basketball team easily stretched its win streak to four games with an 86-66 victory over Incarnate Word Wednesday night, but will have to wait at least a few more days to secure its spot in next month’s Southland Conference tournament. Three different Lamar players reached at least 20 points in the win ...
	Murray, Larsson lift Incarnate Word past New Orleans 67-66 (2/15/2020 10:45:00 PM) Drew Lutz registered 19 points and seven assists and Marcus Larsson threw down the winning dunk with one second remaining as Incarnate Word edged New Orleans 67-66 on Saturday night.
	NSU downs Incarnate Word, extends winning streak to three (2/13/2020 12:38:00 AM) NATCHITOCHES – A staunch defensive effort and second-half offensive surge led to Northwestern State’s third straight win Wednesday in a 70-60 triumph against Incarnate Word in Prather Coliseum. After both teams struggled from the floor in the first half, NSU (11-12, 8-6 Southland Conference) shot 53 percent in the second half as the Demons ...

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox