Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 Incarnate Word 18-11 (0.621) | Southland

All-Play Percentage: 0.291 (249^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.363 (321^st)	Record Quality: -0.030 (189^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 211.12 (212^th)
Pace: 68.48 (34^th)	Momentum: -4.48 (334^th)	Off. Momentum: -6.00 (351^st)	Def. Momentum: 1.52 (46^th)
Consistency: -9.57 (217^th)	Res. Consistency: -9.92 (60^th)	Away From Home: 1.08 (59^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -0.65 (160^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

100.01

30.51

72.23

79.47

43.20

28.40

32.74

23.22

38.64

27.85

57.67

13.13

12.64

5.51

35.74

29.22

35.05

2.01

RANK:

170^th

108^th

78^th

284^th

155^th

159^th

246^th

250^th

38^th

200^th

193^rd

66^th

293^rd

284^th

126^th

232^nd

160^th

200^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

109.77

30.68

83.37

46.83

25.12

37.14

26.43

36.54

31.82

63.04

10.54

16.45

7.73

30.13

31.70

38.17

1.92

RANK:

328^th

234^th

231^st

318^th

59^th

295^th

224^th

213^th

304^th

296^th

96^th

264^th

257^th

44^th

208^th

290^th

310^th

ANALYSIS:
Regardless of what the win percentage says, Incarnate Word isn't a very good team this year. They are ranked #249 (out of 351) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 18-11. Of the 13 schools in the Southland (average ranking 267.4), they're currently ranked as our #5 team in the conference.

If there is a strength for Incarnate Word this year, it's probably on the offensive end of the court. The team is rated 170th in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 100 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Incarnate Word has a keen ability to drain field goals between the three-point line and the low post. The squad is ranked 38th nationally in mid-range field goal percentage, making about 38.6% of their attempts from those locations vs. AO.

Unfortunately, Incarnate Word is not even remotely close to being as good on defense as they are on offense. The team is ranked 328th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 110 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Incarnate Word allows opponents' field goal percentages to get far too high. The ball-club ranks #318 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 46.8% of their total attempts from the floor.

Incarnate Word has been playing some of their worst basketball of the season as of late, and they're presently ranked 334th in positive momentum because of it.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Fri 11/14/2014	vs Texas-Tyler	---	W 89-49	1-0	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Tue 11/18/2014	vs Huston-Tillotson	---	W 94-63	2-0	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 11/22/2014	@ Princeton₁₆₁	L 68.18 - 77.43	W 79-68	3-0	102.29	108.28	▲ 5.99	110.26	88.64	▲ 21.62	▲ 27.61
Mon 11/24/2014	vs Texas A&M-Intl	---	W 105-83	4-0	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Thu 12/4/2014	vs St. Edward's	---	W 85-68	5-0	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Mon 12/8/2014	@ UTEP₈₇	L 63.49 - 77.92	L 65-81	5-1	95.58	83.53	▼ 12.05	111.08	102.66	▲ 8.42	▼ 3.63
Wed 12/10/2014	@ Nebraska₁₀₅	L 60.21 - 73.28	W 74-73	6-1	91.83	108.69	▲ 16.86	105.95	101.31	▲ 4.64	▲ 21.50
Wed 12/17/2014	@ Grand Canyon₂₅₄	L 73.19 - 76.86	W 82-80	7-1	109.00	127.21	▲ 18.21	108.87	116.43	▼ 7.56	▲ 10.65
Sat 12/20/2014	@ UMKC₂₈₉	L 69.54 - 71.15	W 110-104 (3OT)	8-1	104.47	102.97	▼ 1.50	101.92	99.81	▲ 2.11	▲ 0.61
Mon 12/22/2014	@ Tulsa₉₈	L 61.19 - 74.84	L 47-76	8-2	92.38	46.37	▼ 46.01	107.35	102.69	▲ 4.66	▼ 41.35
Sat 1/3/2015	@ Sam Houston₁₁₆	L 63.27 - 75.83	L 78-84	8-3	94.78	98.09	▲ 3.31	106.80	99.47	▲ 7.33	▲ 10.64
Sat 1/10/2015	@ Northwestern St.₂₄₃	L 84.19 - 89.21	L 101-103	8-4	113.85	121.79	▲ 7.94	114.77	119.65	▼ 4.88	▲ 3.06
Mon 1/12/2015	vs New Orleans₃₁₆	W 80.03 - 70.18	W 97-66	9-4	108.26	141.86	▲ 33.60	101.09	97.80	▲ 3.29	▲ 36.89
Sat 1/17/2015	vs SE Louisiana₂₉₄	W 75.48 - 68.29	L 98-108 (2OT)	9-5	104.01	111.45	▲ 7.44	100.42	127.98	▼ 27.56	▼ 20.12
Sat 1/24/2015	@ Abil. Christian₃₄₃	W 73.92 - 66.95	W 77-61	10-5	111.12	118.84	▲ 7.72	96.10	90.68	▲ 5.42	▲ 13.14
Mon 1/26/2015	vs McNeese₂₉₆	W 74.42 - 67.41	W 86-84	11-5	108.06	119.89	▲ 11.83	103.97	124.71	▼ 20.74	▼ 8.91
Sat 1/31/2015	@ Nicholls₃₄₁	W 73.65 - 66.74	W 69-58	12-5	107.44	114.64	▲ 7.20	92.79	93.58	▼ 0.79	▲ 6.41
Tue 2/3/2015	@ Texas A&M-CC₂₄₆	L 67.31 - 71.39	L 70-71	12-6	103.19	110.66	▲ 7.47	103.64	106.26	▼ 2.62	▲ 4.85
Sat 2/7/2015	vs Lamar₃₀₃	W 78.05 - 69.73	W 78-72	13-6	107.75	114.25	▲ 6.50	102.32	110.18	▼ 7.86	▼ 1.36
Tue 2/10/2015	vs Nicholls₃₄₁	W 77.79 - 62.85	W 73-64	14-6	107.44	99.85	▼ 7.59	92.79	95.72	▼ 2.93	▼ 10.52
Fri 2/13/2015	@ Cent. Arkansas₃₄₈	W 83.37 - 71.51	W 77-67	15-6	116.21	122.02	▲ 5.81	95.67	103.38	▼ 7.71	▼ 1.90
Mon 2/16/2015	vs Stephen F. Austin₆₀	L 69.26 - 79.18	L 76-90	15-7	95.35	112.72	▲ 17.37	115.86	138.84	▼ 22.98	▼ 5.61
Sat 2/21/2015	vs Texas A&M-CC₂₄₆	W 71.25 - 67.53	W 74-68	16-7	103.19	105.85	▲ 2.66	103.64	100.03	▲ 3.61	▲ 6.27
Mon 2/23/2015	vs Houston Baptist₃₂₁	W 80.56 - 69.78	W 77-64	17-7	111.87	105.48	▼ 6.39	103.11	95.72	▲ 7.39	▲ 1.00
Sat 2/28/2015	@ Lamar₃₀₃	W 73.91 - 73.75	L 66-79	17-8	107.75	104.73	▼ 3.02	102.32	134.53	▼ 32.21	▼ 35.23
Mon 3/2/2015	@ Stephen F. Austin₆₀	L 65.13 - 83.32	L 62-83	17-9	95.35	85.06	▼ 10.29	115.86	104.38	▲ 11.48	▲ 1.19
Thu 3/5/2015	vs Abil. Christian₃₄₃	W 77.94 - 62.96	W 64-52	18-9	111.12	94.00	▼ 17.12	96.10	79.89	▲ 16.21	▼ 0.91
Sat 3/7/2015	@ Houston Baptist₃₂₁	W 76.43 - 73.92	L 77-78 (OT)	18-10	111.87	94.64	▼ 17.23	103.11	87.44	▲ 15.67	▼ 1.56
Tue 3/17/2015	vs Louisiana₁₄₁	L 75.68 - 78.48	L 68-83	18-11	100.16	80.90	▼ 19.26	110.25	124.28	▼ 14.03	▼ 33.29
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Incarnate Word does better vs. clubs that convert well from the charity stripe. When playing squads that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 68.16%, Incarnate Word performs above average 71% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 13% of the time.
	Incarnate Word performs worse against squads that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 57.72%, Incarnate Word is more efficient than normal 30% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 67% of the time.
	When playing teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot, Incarnate Word usually performs better than average. Incarnate Word is more efficient than normal 67% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.58%. In all other contests, Incarnate Word performs better than average 30% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox