TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Washington St.  22-15 (0.595)  |  Pac-12
All-Play Percentage: 0.843 (57th)
Schedule Strength: 0.600 (85th)
Record Quality: 0.214 (76th)
Avg. Season Rank: 54.45 (49th)
Pace: 67.80 (236th)
Momentum: 1.70 (94th)
Off. Momentum: -0.12 (204th)
Def. Momentum: 1.82 (56th)
Consistency: -10.30 (296th)
Res. Consistency: -13.29 (266th)
Away From Home: 0.73 (111th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.97 (188th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.78 25.58 73.36 88.26 41.89 38.19 34.24 22.23 35.61 27.84 57.39 12.03 19.16 6.37 43.27 25.19 31.54 2.12
RANK: 84th 103rd 128th 21st 264th 17th 142nd 218th 280th 228th 207th 118th 3rd 43rd 45th 260th 286th 319th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 92.92 23.39 -- 82.06 40.72 29.82 30.00 22.83 36.75 29.42 54.68 9.49 12.33 3.58 36.34 27.81 35.85 2.00
RANK: 41st 158th -- 105th 58th 114th 15th 165th 132nd 214th 56th 54th 117th 35th 134th 177th 237th 241st

ANALYSIS:
While this site doesn't quite consider them to be in the national title hunt, Washington St. has the potential to be a formidable opponent for many in Division I. Ranked 57th overall (out of 358) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 22-15. They are also ranked by this site as the #4 team (out of 12) in the Pac-12 (average ranking 92.8).

Washington St. has a fairly effective defensive attack. Occupying the #41 slot in our defensive efficiency ratings, they will allow about 93 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Washington St. does an outstanding job shutting down the opposition from behind the arc. They rank 15th in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 30.0% of their attempts from afar. Washington St. is also one of the better teams when it comes to not allowing opponents to convert scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 3.6% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 35th in the NCAA).

Washington St. plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 84th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 106 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Washington St. appears to be one of the top-notch offensive rebounding teams you will find this year. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 19.16 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked third in the NCAA), and they convert 6.4% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 43rd) as well. Washington St. is also one of the very best when it comes to maximizing field goal opportunities. The team is ranked 21st in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 88.26 vs. AO. Conversely, the squad isn't all that good at draining those shots, converting about 41.9% of their total attempts vs. AO.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter, Washington St. often performs worse than normal. Washington St. is more efficient than usual 22% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.03. In their other contests, Washington St. performs better than the norm 79% of the time.
Washington St. does worse vs. clubs that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.79%, Washington St. performs above average 21% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 70% of the time.
Washington St. performs worse against squads that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 9.14, Washington St. is more efficient than normal 39% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 82% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
NIT bracket 2022: Tournament schedule, college basketball scores, dates, times for semifinals
(3/23/2022 11:31:22 PM) The semifinals for the NIT are set after quarterfinals concluded Wednesday
Flowers scores 27 to lead Washington State past BYU in NIT
(3/23/2022 11:27:04 PM) PROVO, Utah (AP) — Michael Flowers had 27 points as Washington State beat BYU 77-58 in the quarterfinals of the NIT on Wednesday night.
Flowers scores 22, Washington St. beats SMU 75-63 in NIT
(3/20/2022 5:59:14 PM) DALLAS (AP) — Michael Flowers had 22 points as Washington State beat SMU 75-63 in the NIT second round on Sunday.
Washington State never trails, beats Cal in Pac-12 tourney
(3/9/2022 11:48:56 PM) LAS VEGAS (AP) — Efe Abogidi scored 11 of his 19 points in the first half and No. 7 seed Washington State never trailed in its 66-59 victory over tent...
Bamba sparks Washington State to 71-67 win over Oregon State
(3/4/2022 2:20:06 AM) PULLMAN, Wash. (AP) — TJ Bamba came off the bench to score 16 points and grab eight rebounds, sparking Washington State to a 71-67 victory over Oregon State on Thursday night. Bamba hit two 3-pointers and scored eight in the first half, but the Cougars (17-13…
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox