TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Wright State  18-15 (0.545)  |  Horizon
All-Play Percentage: 0.456 (198th)
Schedule Strength: 0.331 (295th)
Record Quality: -0.062 (212th)
Avg. Season Rank: 200.50 (200th)
Pace: 71.90 (15th)
Momentum: -2.70 (295th)
Off. Momentum: -0.10 (219th)
Def. Momentum: -2.60 (291st)
Consistency: -9.48 (223rd)
Res. Consistency: -12.50 (207th)
Away From Home: 0.71 (46th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.74 (256th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 101.91 20.49 74.16 84.96 46.30 24.09 33.36 30.89 43.97 29.98 59.11 10.04 12.76 5.91 28.35 36.35 35.29 1.93
RANK: 189th 350th 98th 163rd 55th 344th 216th 18th 10th 148th 166th 221st 252nd 106th 350th 16th 170th 31st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.37 23.19 -- 85.50 44.92 31.23 34.54 25.53 38.27 28.75 62.09 12.59 13.89 5.90 36.53 29.85 33.62 2.03
RANK: 187th 94th -- 217th 230th 196th 213th 259th 202nd 141st 290th 314th 187th 272nd 173rd 250th 126th 158th

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but Wright State should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. Carrying a record of 18-15, they are currently rated #198 overall (out of 363) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the 11 schools in the Horizon League (average ranking 233.9), they're currently ranked as our #5 team in the conference.

Though their offense is far from the worst in the game, Wright State is not terribly gifted on that end of the court either. Scoring about 102 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked at #189 in offensive efficiency. Wright State does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 20.49 vs. AO, they are 350th in the overall rankings for that category. Wright State also has some difficulty protecting the ball efficiently when in possession, which leads to some quick and easy baskets for the opposition. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 12.59, which ranks 314th in D1. If Wright State does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to successfully hit from mid-range locations on the court. The team makes 44.0% of their in-between field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks tenth in the NCAA.

Wright State doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 103 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #187 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Wright State does not stand out in a positive manner when they're asked to defend in the paint. The team is ranked 290th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 62.1% of their attempts from close-up.

On the road, Wright State performs somewhat better than their norm, as the squad is nationally ranked 46th in our away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Wright State does better vs. clubs that do not defend well on the perimeter. When playing squads that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.85%, Wright State performs above average 57% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 10% of the time.
Wright State performs worse against squads that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 10.26, Wright State is more efficient than normal 22% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 69% of the time.
When playing teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot, Wright State usually performs better than average. Wright State is more efficient than normal 55% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 36.63%. In all other contests, Wright State performs better than average 11% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox