Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 Wright State25-10 (0.714) | Horizon
All-Play Percentage: 0.600 (141st)
Schedule Strength: 0.419 (258th)
Record Quality: 0.147 (102nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 145.06 (145th)
Pace: 70.17 (180th)
Momentum: -0.06 (168th)
Off. Momentum: 1.11 (126th)
Def. Momentum: -1.17 (211th)
Consistency: -8.58 (117th)
Res. Consistency: -10.47 (90th)
Away From Home: 0.41 (93rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.06 (192nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
98.31
70.15
27.78
72.01
80.93
34.11
42.14
30.39
10.09
33.21
24.21
8.39
34.66
26.33
15.63
59.34
9.77
13.38
5.88
37.55
29.91
32.54
2.05
RANK:
231st
182nd
100th
158th
228th
274th
267th
181st
228th
275th
118th
167th
278th
264th
250th
177th
237th
231st
241st
160th
106th
254th
218th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
96.75
70.19
23.91
--
79.94
34.35
42.97
30.31
10.82
35.71
27.32
9.80
35.85
22.31
13.74
61.57
9.18
13.68
6.58
37.91
34.18
27.91
2.10
RANK:
63rd
174th
88th
--
90th
76th
113th
158th
177th
194th
315th
304th
113th
11th
28th
220th
37th
99th
147th
204th
334th
17th
48th
ANALYSIS: As an average to slightly above-average foe, Wright State should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. Carrying a record of 25-10, they are currently rated #141 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the 10 schools in the Horizon League (average ranking 228.5), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference.
Wright State has a fairly effective defensive attack. Occupying the #63 slot in our defensive efficiency ratings, they will allow about 97 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Wright State makes a point to avoid fouls and prevent opponents from getting to the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 23.91 vs. AO, they are currently rated 88th in the country in that category.
Unfortunately, Wright State is not even remotely close to being as good on offense as they are on defense. The team is ranked 231st in offensive efficiency, scoring about 98 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Wright State has some difficulties converting mid-range shot attempts. The team is ranked 278th in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 34.7% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO. If Wright State does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's care for the ball. The squad has a rating of 9.18 in potential points allowed off of steals vs. AO, which ranks 37th in the college game.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Wright State does worse vs. clubs that effectively clean the offensive glass. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 14.41, Wright State performs above average 20% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 61% of the time.
Wright State performs better against squads that favor a faster tempo. When facing teams that have a pace vs. AO greater than 69.56, Wright State is more efficient than normal 63% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 29% of the time.
When playing teams that convert well from the charity stripe, Wright State usually performs better than average. Wright State is more efficient than normal 63% of the time when facing clubs that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 71.49%. In all other contests, Wright State performs better than average 29% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.