Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 Richmond 22-13 (0.629) | Atlantic 10

All-Play Percentage: 0.766 (84^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.615 (85^th)	Record Quality: 0.228 (65^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 109.50 (109^th)
Pace: 70.45 (161^st)	Momentum: 1.76 (88^th)	Off. Momentum: 5.12 (4^th)	Def. Momentum: -3.36 (318^th)
Consistency: -10.22 (317^th)	Res. Consistency: -10.56 (119^th)	Away From Home: 2.10 (10^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: 1.40 (23^rd)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

107.11

24.62

71.12

81.88

47.65

33.11

34.89

21.68

42.26

27.10

67.57

11.22

10.34

4.95

40.43

26.47

33.10

2.07

RANK:

74^th

276^th

148^th

172^nd

41^st

70^th

187^th

238^th

6^th

239^th

17^th

141^st

332^nd

316^th

68^th

249^th

230^th

277^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

99.56

26.04

80.95

43.91

28.76

32.83

26.61

36.92

25.59

63.63

9.80

17.22

9.13

35.52

32.87

31.61

2.04

RANK:

117^th

115^th

131^st

150^th

143^rd

55^th

292^nd

172^nd

63^rd

274^th

95^th

332^nd

336^th

149^th

307^th

71^st

120^th

ANALYSIS:
While this site doesn't quite consider them to be in the national title hunt, Richmond has the potential to be a formidable opponent for many in Division I. They have a record of 22-13 and are ranked 84th overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 14 schools in the A-10 (average ranking 124.5), they're currently ranked as our #6 team in the conference.

The primary strength for Richmond this year is offense. The team is ranked 74th in efficiency on that end of the floor, and they'll rack up more than 107 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Richmond is an excellent shooting team, capable of converting from multiple locations on the court and ranking in the top-50 in three of our four primary field goal categories. They are most proficient from two-point range, making good on 42.3% of their mid-range jumpers (sixth in the nation), 67.6% of their near-proximity chances (17th), and 47.7% of their total shots from the field (41st) vs. AO. Richmond will also likely shoot a fair share of three-pointers each contest. The team ranks 68th in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. If Richmond does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties obtaining second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad only has a rating of 10.34 vs. AO in potential points off of second chances, which ranks 20th-worst in college hoops.

Richmond plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 117th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 100 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Richmond owns a pretty good track record against teams that shoot the three. They rank 55th in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 32.8% of their attempts from afar. If Richmond does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's issues trying to stop opponents from obtaining and converting second-chance opportunities via offensive rebounds. The squad has a defensive second-chance conversion percentage of 9.1% vs. AO, which ranks 16th-worst in the nation.

Richmond has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 317th in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most. When playing on the road, Richmond has played their best basketball this season. The team is currently ranked tenth in the country in the away-from-home metric our site tracks.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Fri 11/11/2016	vs VMI₃₂₇	W 85.73 - 63.83	W 72-69	1-0	118.95	93.73	▼ 25.22	92.11	94.00	▼ 1.89	▼ 27.11
Mon 11/14/2016	vs Old Dominion₁₁₇	W 66.09 - 60.03	L 61-64	1-1	99.63	99.45	▼ 0.18	93.97	107.13	▼ 13.16	▼ 13.34
Sun 11/20/2016	vs Robert Morris₂₇₃	W 76.17 - 59.71	W 81-69	2-1	104.59	104.54	▼ 0.05	85.72	91.26	▼ 5.54	▼ 5.59
Tue 11/22/2016	vs Hampton₃₁₄	W 80.10 - 59.95	W 65-52	3-1	111.58	97.78	▼ 13.80	87.01	84.76	▲ 2.25	▼ 11.55
Fri 11/25/2016	vs Maryland₄₈ *	L 69.84 - 75.01	L 82-88 (OT)	3-2	100.67	100.00	▼ 0.67	107.75	97.22	▲ 10.53	▲ 9.86
Sat 11/26/2016	vs Boston College₁₃₇ *	W 76.59 - 71.64	W 67-54	4-2	105.32	96.97	▼ 8.35	98.73	75.38	▲ 23.35	▲ 15.00
Wed 11/30/2016	@ Bucknell₈₁	L 73.09 - 76.30	L 68-73	4-3	103.75	82.70	▼ 21.05	103.46	86.81	▲ 16.65	▼ 4.40
Sat 12/3/2016	vs Wake Forest₃₀	L 77.50 - 82.27	L 67-75	4-4	104.11	89.57	▼ 14.54	114.49	103.57	▲ 10.92	▼ 3.62
Sat 12/10/2016	vs UMBC₁₉₇	W 83.48 - 71.62	W 78-75	5-4	113.17	107.64	▼ 5.53	101.09	106.38	▼ 5.29	▼ 10.82
Sat 12/17/2016	vs Texas Tech₃₁	L 67.49 - 71.57	L 72-79	5-5	99.73	103.67	▲ 3.94	109.37	118.39	▼ 9.02	▼ 5.08
Tue 12/20/2016	@ JMU₂₂₁	W 70.14 - 63.39	W 75-55	6-5	106.77	110.28	▲ 3.51	92.27	71.22	▲ 21.05	▲ 24.56
Fri 12/23/2016	@ Oral Roberts₂₀₃	W 78.78 - 72.75	L 72-87	6-6	112.94	102.22	▼ 10.72	99.84	114.45	▼ 14.61	▼ 25.33
Sat 12/31/2016	@ Davidson₇₉	L 71.47 - 74.66	W 82-80	7-6	103.43	116.10	▲ 12.67	103.16	105.89	▼ 2.73	▲ 9.94
Wed 1/4/2017	vs Fordham₁₈₅	W 70.97 - 60.83	W 80-72	8-6	103.59	112.28	▲ 8.69	92.75	102.22	▼ 9.47	▼ 0.78
Sun 1/8/2017	@ G. Washington₁₂₈	W 72.21 - 71.17	W 77-70	9-6	107.96	118.88	▲ 10.92	101.84	102.26	▼ 0.42	▲ 10.50
Wed 1/11/2017	vs St. Bonaventure₈₃	W 75.45 - 72.24	W 78-61	10-6	103.98	106.74	▲ 2.76	103.89	90.09	▲ 13.80	▲ 16.56
Sat 1/14/2017	@ Saint Joe's₁₅₇	W 73.27 - 70.62	W 70-66	11-6	105.73	91.96	▼ 13.77	97.81	83.50	▲ 14.31	▲ 0.54
Thu 1/19/2017	@ Dayton₄₂	L 67.41 - 76.52	L 59-75	11-7	97.39	90.28	▼ 7.11	105.14	105.36	▼ 0.22	▼ 7.33
Sun 1/22/2017	vs George Mason₁₃₁	W 77.68 - 69.82	L 77-82	11-8	107.56	92.85	▼ 14.71	100.53	103.45	▼ 2.92	▼ 17.63
Wed 1/25/2017	vs URI₄₄	L 69.38 - 72.18	W 73-62	12-8	98.88	84.20	▼ 14.68	106.54	73.82	▲ 32.72	▲ 18.04
Sat 1/28/2017	vs Duquesne₂₁₉	W 80.82 - 67.56	W 101-90	13-8	110.36	133.40	▲ 23.04	96.04	118.43	▼ 22.39	▲ 0.65
Wed 2/1/2017	@ VCU₅₂	L 68.10 - 75.89	L 74-81	13-9	98.21	107.93	▲ 9.72	104.11	113.50	▼ 9.39	▲ 0.33
Sat 2/4/2017	vs G. Washington₁₂₈	W 75.20 - 68.10	W 84-75	14-9	107.96	114.45	▲ 6.49	101.84	104.96	▼ 3.12	▲ 3.37
Sat 2/11/2017	@ La Salle₁₁₂	L 75.95 - 76.09	W 64-52	15-9	109.77	89.89	▼ 19.88	105.15	65.84	▲ 39.31	▲ 19.43
Tue 2/14/2017	@ George Mason₁₃₁	W 74.59 - 72.98	L 70-93	15-10	107.56	99.23	▼ 8.33	100.53	122.78	▼ 22.25	▼ 30.58
Fri 2/17/2017	vs VCU₅₂	L 71.19 - 72.78	L 73-84	15-11	98.21	90.43	▼ 7.78	104.11	113.64	▼ 9.53	▼ 17.31
Tue 2/21/2017	vs Davidson₇₉	W 74.55 - 71.48	W 84-76	16-11	103.43	123.16	▲ 19.73	103.16	117.37	▼ 14.21	▲ 5.52
Sat 2/25/2017	@ Fordham₁₈₅	W 68.03 - 63.79	W 70-48	17-11	103.59	108.88	▲ 5.29	92.75	68.97	▲ 23.78	▲ 29.07
Wed 3/1/2017	@ UMass₁₅₀	W 74.97 - 72.46	W 75-64	18-11	103.01	123.88	▲ 20.87	95.17	91.23	▲ 3.94	▲ 24.81
Sat 3/4/2017	vs Saint Louis₂₇₇	W 74.36 - 58.52	W 72-62	19-11	108.89	119.82	▲ 10.93	89.64	107.39	▼ 17.75	▼ 6.82
Fri 3/10/2017	vs G. Washington₁₂₈ *	W 73.71 - 69.64	W 70-67	20-11	107.96	122.81	▲ 14.85	101.84	117.54	▼ 15.70	▼ 0.85
Sat 3/11/2017	vs VCU₅₂ *	L 69.64 - 74.34	L 77-87 (OT)	20-12	98.21	104.41	▲ 6.20	104.11	101.43	▲ 2.68	▲ 8.88
Tue 3/14/2017	@ Alabama₅₅	L 63.38 - 69.95	W 71-64	21-12	96.16	108.19	▲ 12.03	100.81	91.90	▲ 8.91	▲ 20.94
Sun 3/19/2017	vs Oakland₁₀₆	W 77.33 - 71.58	W 87-83	22-12	102.79	120.32	▲ 17.53	98.87	119.12	▼ 20.25	▼ 2.72
Tue 3/21/2017	@ TCU₃₅	L 67.01 - 76.60	L 68-86	22-13	99.49	102.22	▲ 2.73	109.07	133.99	▼ 24.92	▼ 22.19
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Richmond is typically worse vs. teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. Against foes that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 54.89%, Richmond performs above their norm 36% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 80% of the time.
	When facing teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot, Richmond often performs better than normal. Richmond is more efficient than usual 60% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.76%. In their other contests, Richmond performs better than the norm 20% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox