Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 The Citadel 13-18 (0.419) | Southern

All-Play Percentage: 0.286 (255^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.417 (190^th)	Record Quality: -0.158 (254^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 243.94 (245^th)
Pace: 71.26 (40^th)	Momentum: -0.01 (178^th)	Off. Momentum: -0.18 (209^th)	Def. Momentum: 0.17 (136^th)
Consistency: -9.93 (260^th)	Res. Consistency: -12.61 (226^th)	Away From Home: 2.20 (21^st)	Paper Tiger Factor: -1.30 (217^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

98.66

23.16

66.19

82.63

42.52

38.20

34.22

18.57

40.00

25.85

56.59

8.02

13.57

5.43

46.23

22.48

31.29

2.15

RANK:

212^th

220^th

333^rd

226^th

223^rd

16^th

144^th

309^th

74^th

299^th

244^th

330^th

147^th

111^th

13^th

314^th

294^th

340^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

107.43

24.24

89.52

44.08

32.36

32.78

25.22

37.83

31.94

60.45

12.38

15.62

6.20

36.15

28.17

35.68

2.00

RANK:

306^th

201^st

350^th

199^th

225^th

115^th

277^th

176^th

302^nd

233^rd

280^th

326^th

314^th

127^th

197^th

225^th

242^nd

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but The Citadel should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. Haslametrics has them ranked 255th overall (out of 358) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 13-18. Of the 10 schools in the Southern (average ranking 176.3), they're currently ranked as our #9 team in the conference.

The Citadel does not provide much of a challenge on defense. They are ranked at #306 in efficiency on that end of the court and give up about 107 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. The Citadel allows the opposition to get off far too many shots from the floor. The team is ranked ninth from the bottom in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 89.52 vs. AO. The Citadel also does a pretty inadequate job to provide chances for themselves to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked #330 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 8.02 vs. AO.

Though they rate better on offense than they do on defense, The Citadel still isn't one of the more capable offensive teams in college hoops. Scoring roughly 99 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #212 in the nation in offensive efficiency. The Citadel is not one of the better teams when it comes to sinking foul shots. Converting just 66.2% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #333 overall in free throw percentage.

When playing on the road, The Citadel has played their best basketball this season. The team is currently ranked 21st in the country in the away-from-home metric our site tracks.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Tue 11/9/2021	@ Pittsburgh₁₉₇	L 66.32 - 73.60	W 78-63	1-0	97.57	114.98	▲ 17.41	103.44	86.39	▲ 17.05	▲ 34.46
Fri 11/12/2021	vs Morris College	---	W 108-67	2-0	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Mon 11/15/2021	@ Presbyterian₂₅₆	L 67.21 - 70.77	L 70-74 (2OT)	2-1	98.68	94.61	▼ 4.07	99.60	87.80	▲ 11.80	▲ 7.73
Thu 11/18/2021	vs Carver College	---	W 102-49	3-1	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Mon 11/22/2021	@ Duke₁₀	L 63.94 - 91.92	L 81-107	3-2	90.86	115.17	▲ 24.31	123.88	144.95	▼ 21.07	▲ 3.24
Sun 11/28/2021	@ S. Carolina St.₃₁₇	W 75.54 - 74.51	W 91-79 (OT)	4-2	103.03	111.08	▲ 8.05	97.03	92.05	▲ 4.98	▲ 13.03
Wed 12/1/2021	@ UNC Asheville₂₂₀	L 70.84 - 77.26	L 58-65	4-3	100.31	83.23	▼ 17.08	104.27	87.61	▲ 16.66	▼ 0.42
Mon 12/6/2021	vs NC Central₂₈₅	W 75.82 - 70.33	W 80-67	5-3	100.94	108.60	▲ 7.66	98.45	95.53	▲ 2.92	▲ 10.58
Thu 12/16/2021	vs St. Andrews	---	W 102-62	6-3	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Mon 12/20/2021	vs S. Carolina St.₃₁₇	W 79.32 - 70.64	L 57-74	6-4	103.03	74.79	▼ 28.24	97.03	106.64	▼ 9.61	▼ 37.85
Tue 12/21/2021	vs Manhattan₂₆₇	W 78.34 - 73.87	L 74-77	6-5	103.69	100.11	▼ 3.58	102.86	108.15	▼ 5.29	▼ 8.87
Wed 1/5/2022	@ W. Carolina₃₀₆	W 76.37 - 76.10	L 90-94 (OT)	6-6	106.51	118.39	▲ 11.88	101.18	114.30	▼ 13.12	▼ 1.24
Sat 1/8/2022	@ Chattanooga₈₆	L 63.58 - 80.02	L 67-85	6-7	93.37	95.21	▲ 1.84	111.56	118.08	▼ 6.52	▼ 4.68
Thu 1/13/2022	vs UNCG₁₈₆	L 67.51 - 68.56	W 74-69	7-7	96.33	103.04	▲ 6.71	103.31	99.73	▲ 3.58	▲ 10.29
Sat 1/15/2022	vs VMI₁₅₃	L 77.78 - 80.43	L 85-90	7-8	103.41	105.22	▲ 1.81	112.37	119.56	▼ 7.19	▼ 5.38
Mon 1/17/2022	vs Mercer₁₉₆	L 73.59 - 73.73	L 64-71	7-9	102.38	73.72	▼ 28.66	107.60	100.94	▲ 6.66	▼ 22.00
Wed 1/19/2022	@ Wofford₁₁₆	L 65.99 - 78.28	L 77-89	7-10	97.53	109.92	▲ 12.39	109.85	126.31	▼ 16.46	▼ 4.07
Sat 1/22/2022	@ ETSU₁₈₃	L 71.65 - 80.01	W 75-73	8-10	103.88	108.31	▲ 4.43	110.27	98.72	▲ 11.55	▲ 15.98
Wed 1/26/2022	vs W. Carolina₃₀₆	W 80.07 - 72.39	W 68-66	9-10	106.51	94.47	▼ 12.04	101.18	96.96	▲ 4.22	▼ 7.82
Sat 1/29/2022	vs Chattanooga₈₆	L 67.10 - 76.28	L 62-75	9-11	93.37	83.97	▼ 9.40	111.56	105.49	▲ 6.07	▼ 3.33
Wed 2/2/2022	@ Furman₇₉	L 66.36 - 83.33	L 83-102	9-12	96.86	88.04	▼ 8.82	116.15	173.52	▼ 57.37	▼ 66.19
Sat 2/5/2022	vs Samford₂₀₃	W 76.93 - 76.92	W 107-93	10-12	100.87	138.42	▲ 37.55	107.15	119.11	▼ 11.96	▲ 25.59
Thu 2/10/2022	@ UNCG₁₈₆	L 64.07 - 72.09	L 66-86	10-13	96.33	98.19	▲ 1.86	103.31	119.72	▼ 16.41	▼ 14.55
Sat 2/12/2022	@ VMI₁₅₃	L 74.08 - 84.42	W 83-79	11-13	103.41	109.08	▲ 5.67	112.37	93.53	▲ 18.84	▲ 24.51
Wed 2/16/2022	vs Wofford₁₁₆	L 69.49 - 74.53	L 58-65	11-14	97.53	81.39	▼ 16.14	109.85	98.26	▲ 11.59	▼ 4.55
Sat 2/19/2022	vs ETSU₁₈₃	L 75.22 - 76.32	L 67-77	11-15	103.88	94.43	▼ 9.45	110.27	115.91	▼ 5.64	▼ 15.09
Mon 2/21/2022	@ Samford₂₀₃	L 73.19 - 80.80	L 74-76	11-16	100.87	102.67	▲ 1.80	107.15	98.66	▲ 8.49	▲ 10.29
Wed 2/23/2022	@ Mercer₁₉₆	L 70.05 - 77.48	W 71-67	12-16	102.38	116.68	▲ 14.30	107.60	105.54	▲ 2.06	▲ 16.36
Sat 2/26/2022	vs Furman₇₉	L 69.90 - 79.56	L 59-94	12-17	96.86	85.79	▼ 11.07	116.15	146.90	▼ 30.75	▼ 41.82
Fri 3/4/2022	vs ETSU₁₈₃ *	L 73.43 - 78.17	W 84-76 (OT)	13-17	103.88	107.81	▲ 3.93	110.27	107.81	▲ 2.46	▲ 6.39
Sat 3/5/2022	vs Chattanooga₈₆ *	L 65.34 - 78.14	L 66-71	13-18	93.37	94.03	▲ 0.66	111.56	109.23	▲ 2.33	▲ 2.99
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	When facing teams that convert well from the charity stripe, The Citadel often performs worse than normal. The Citadel is more efficient than usual 27% of the time when facing teams that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 0.74%. In their other contests, The Citadel performs better than the norm 71% of the time.
	The Citadel does worse vs. clubs that prefer the outside shot. When playing squads that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.08, The Citadel performs above average 25% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 65% of the time.
	The Citadel performs better against squads that effectively clean the offensive glass. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 12.12, The Citadel is more efficient than normal 65% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 25% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Moffe scores 24 to carry The Citadel past Mercer 71-67 (2/23/2022 10:46:53 PM) MACON, Ga. (AP) — Tyler Moffe had a career-high 24 points as The Citadel narrowly beat Mercer 71-67 on Wednesday night.
	Brewer leads E. Tennessee St. past The Citadel 77-67 (2/19/2022 4:40:46 PM) CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) — Ledarrius Brewer had a season-high 29 points as East Tennessee State defeated The Citadel 77-67 on Saturday.
	The Citadel beats St. Andrews Presbyterian 102-62 (12/16/2021 10:46:27 PM) CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) — Hayden Brown scored 25 points as The Citadel easily defeated St. Andrews Presbyterian 102-62 on Thursday night. Jason Roche ad...
	The Citadel defeats South Carolina State 91-79 in OT (11/28/2021 6:28:14 PM) ORANGEBURG, S.C. (AP) — Rudy Fitzgibbons, III scored six of his 20 points as The Citadel defeated South Carolina State 91-79 in overtime on Sunday.
	Brown carries The Citadel past Carver College 102-49 (11/18/2021 11:53:59 PM) CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) — Hayden Brown had 16 points and 10 rebounds to carry The Citadel to a 102-49 win over Carver College on Thursday night.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox