Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Tarleton 14-17 (0.452) | WAC

All-Play Percentage: 0.445 (199^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.443 (161^st)	Record Quality: -0.087 (224^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 183.74 (183^rd)
Pace: 65.22 (339^th)	Momentum: -0.48 (205^th)	Off. Momentum: 0.59 (165^th)	Def. Momentum: -1.07 (216^th)
Consistency: -9.17 (169^th)	Res. Consistency: -13.49 (277^th)	Away From Home: 0.69 (117^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -0.42 (125^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

97.33

24.13

75.43

83.82

42.06

26.46

32.59

23.87

37.54

33.50

52.76

12.44

14.49

5.92

31.56

28.47

39.96

1.92

RANK:

239^th

177^th

57^th

167^th

254^th

313^th

243^rd

154^th

188^th

26^th

331^st

94^th

102^nd

75^th

320^th

162^nd

27^th

17^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

100.10

26.89

78.75

44.46

33.89

32.93

15.50

38.64

29.36

60.84

9.30

15.11

5.84

43.04

19.68

37.29

2.06

RANK:

162^nd

288^th

23^rd

213^th

289^th

128^th

1^st

218^th

211^th

247^th

46^th

298^th

289^th

341^st

1^st

287^th

112^th

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, Tarleton is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. They are ranked #199 (out of 358) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 14-17. They are also ranked by this site as the #8 team (out of 13) in the WAC (average ranking 193.9).

Based on their performances this year, Tarleton will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 100 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO and favoring a more deliberate, half-court style of play (the 20th-slowest pace in D1), they currently occupy the #162 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. Tarleton has extremely pesky defenders that ceaselessly attempt to deny opponents ample opportunity to shoot. The club is ranked 23rd in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 78.75 vs. AO.

Tarleton doesn't perform as well offensively as they do defensively. The team is ranked 239th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 97 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Tarleton won't provide opponents much of a scare with their shooting percentage from the inside. The team is ranked 331st in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 52.8% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. If Tarleton does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's care for the ball. The squad has a rating of 9.30 in potential points allowed off of steals vs. AO, which ranks 46th in the college game.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Tue 11/9/2021	@ Stanford₁₀₉	L 58.92 - 67.86	L 50-62	0-1	92.67	86.01	▼ 6.66	101.57	101.97	▼ 0.40	▼ 7.06
Fri 11/12/2021	@ Kansas₂	L 55.79 - 80.74	L 62-88	0-2	85.09	91.20	▲ 6.11	117.26	121.06	▼ 3.80	▲ 2.31
Tue 11/16/2021	@ Wichita State₉₄	L 57.35 - 68.75	L 51-65	0-3	90.05	76.11	▼ 13.94	102.49	95.77	▲ 6.72	▼ 7.22
Fri 11/19/2021	vs Paul Quinn	---	W 69-42	1-3	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Mon 11/22/2021	@ North Dakota St.₁₄₈	L 60.89 - 67.36	L 53-54	1-4	95.82	92.50	▼ 3.32	100.31	92.06	▲ 8.25	▲ 4.93
Wed 11/24/2021	@ Michigan₂₃	L 56.90 - 74.60	L 54-65	1-5	89.77	88.39	▼ 1.38	111.74	100.50	▲ 11.24	▲ 9.86
Mon 11/29/2021	@ Gonzaga₁	L 57.33 - 85.54	L 55-64	1-6	84.22	86.96	▲ 2.74	118.53	93.93	▲ 24.60	▲ 27.34
Sun 12/5/2021	vs Charleston So.₃₄₁	W 73.56 - 58.73	L 57-59	1-7	105.52	83.69	▼ 21.83	89.06	92.07	▼ 3.01	▼ 24.84
Tue 12/7/2021	vs Dallas Christ.	---	W 84-65	2-7	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Wed 12/8/2021	vs SW Assem Of God	---	W 81-75	3-7	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Tue 12/14/2021	@ South Alabama₁₄₄	L 60.76 - 67.46	L 62-69	3-8	93.77	83.75	▼ 10.02	98.89	94.51	▲ 4.38	▼ 5.64
Fri 12/17/2021	vs South Alabama₁₄₄	W 64.31 - 64.04	W 65-52	4-8	93.77	100.50	▲ 6.73	98.89	85.21	▲ 13.68	▲ 20.41
Tue 12/21/2021	vs Air Force₂₄₂	W 62.45 - 56.56	W 67-45	5-8	97.03	106.42	▲ 9.39	92.89	69.94	▲ 22.95	▲ 32.34
Thu 12/30/2021	@ Dixie State₂₇₈	W 67.63 - 66.17	W 83-69	6-8	98.70	124.94	▲ 26.24	92.32	104.72	▼ 12.40	▲ 13.84
Sat 1/1/2022	@ Utah Valley₁₄₀	L 58.95 - 65.63	L 55-77	6-9	93.68	81.72	▼ 11.96	99.21	101.87	▼ 2.66	▼ 14.62
Thu 1/6/2022	vs Sam Houston₁₃₁	L 60.93 - 61.27	W 75-64	7-9	92.14	113.20	▲ 21.06	98.22	93.30	▲ 4.92	▲ 25.98
Sat 1/8/2022	vs Stephen F. Austin₁₂₇	L 65.21 - 65.92	W 77-71 (OT)	8-9	93.51	88.50	▼ 5.01	99.87	95.21	▲ 4.66	▼ 0.35
Thu 1/13/2022	@ New Mexico St.₈₇	L 57.15 - 68.80	L 57-73	8-10	90.72	80.26	▼ 10.46	103.87	116.29	▼ 12.42	▼ 22.88
Sat 1/15/2022	@ Grand Canyon₉₁	L 56.87 - 68.10	L 59-80	8-11	90.14	77.18	▼ 12.96	102.68	130.66	▼ 27.98	▼ 40.94
Thu 1/20/2022	vs Cal Baptist₂₁₁	W 66.14 - 61.98	L 84-88	8-12	97.96	110.84	▲ 12.88	96.85	122.81	▼ 25.96	▼ 13.08
Sat 1/22/2022	vs Seattle₁₄₉	W 66.04 - 65.21	L 68-76	8-13	92.60	84.23	▼ 8.37	97.23	97.67	▼ 0.44	▼ 8.81
Wed 1/26/2022	@ Lamar₃₄₄	W 68.09 - 60.03	W 62-57	9-13	106.31	102.67	▼ 3.64	89.47	89.26	▲ 0.21	▼ 3.43
Sat 1/29/2022	@ UT Rio Grande₃₀₃	W 72.67 - 69.08	W 79-64	10-13	105.65	123.64	▲ 17.99	95.81	89.39	▲ 6.42	▲ 24.41
Sat 2/5/2022	vs Chicago State₃₄₀	W 71.63 - 57.31	W 57-54	11-13	106.53	87.45	▼ 19.08	90.43	89.77	▲ 0.66	▼ 18.42
Sat 2/12/2022	vs Abil. Christian₁₂₁	L 66.52 - 67.56	L 63-77	11-14	93.63	98.94	▲ 5.31	101.36	126.87	▼ 25.51	▼ 20.20
Wed 2/16/2022	vs Utah Valley₁₄₀	W 62.40 - 62.29	L 56-69	11-15	93.68	83.04	▼ 10.64	99.21	107.36	▼ 8.15	▼ 18.79
Sat 2/19/2022	@ Chicago State₃₄₀	W 68.13 - 60.58	W 79-60	12-15	106.53	130.45	▲ 23.92	90.43	80.35	▲ 10.08	▲ 34.00
Thu 2/24/2022	vs UT Rio Grande₃₀₃	W 76.43 - 65.47	W 75-62	13-15	105.65	122.33	▲ 16.68	95.81	109.57	▼ 13.76	▲ 2.92
Sat 2/26/2022	vs Lamar₃₄₄	W 71.60 - 56.68	W 57-49	14-15	106.31	89.26	▼ 17.05	89.47	83.00	▲ 6.47	▼ 10.58
Thu 3/3/2022	@ Sam Houston₁₃₁	L 57.50 - 64.38	L 50-69	14-16	92.14	91.96	▼ 0.18	98.22	113.12	▼ 14.90	▼ 15.08
Sat 3/5/2022	@ Abil. Christian₁₂₁	L 62.85 - 71.20	L 56-61	14-17	93.63	88.83	▼ 4.80	101.36	91.17	▲ 10.19	▲ 5.39
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Tarleton does better vs. clubs that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. When playing squads that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.71%, Tarleton performs above average 80% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 28% of the time.
	Tarleton performs better against squads that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 59.52%, Tarleton is more efficient than normal 75% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 35% of the time.
	When playing teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds, Tarleton usually performs better than average. Tarleton is more efficient than normal 75% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 14.51. In all other contests, Tarleton performs better than average 35% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Small leads Tarleton State past Chicago St. 79-60 (2/19/2022 5:31:46 PM) CHICAGO (AP) — Tahj Small scored 23 points as Tarleton State topped Chicago State 79-60 on Saturday.
	Gipson helps lead Tarleton State over Lamar 62-57 (1/26/2022 11:56:25 PM) BEAUMONT, Texas (AP) — Montre Gipson scored 18 points and Tarleton State defeated Lamar 62-57 on Wednesday night.
	Akin carries California Baptist over Tarleton State 88-84 (1/20/2022 10:44:49 PM) STEPHENVILLE, Texas (AP) — Daniel Akin had 22 points and 14 rebounds as California Baptist narrowly defeated Tarleton State 88-84 on Thursday night.
	Grand Canyon blows out Tarleton State in first time ever playing on ESPNU at home (1/15/2022 11:01:23 PM) Grand Canyon got its big national audience at home Saturday night. And the Antelopes didn't disappointing, draining 3s and blowing out Tarleton State.
	Small leads Tarleton State past Air Force 67-45 (12/21/2021 10:38:16 PM) STEPHENVILLE, Texas (AP) — Tahj Small posted 14 points as Tarleton State routed Air Force 67-45 on Tuesday night.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox