TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Texas  19-8 (0.704)  |  Big 12
All-Play Percentage: 0.941 (22nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.768 (39th)
Record Quality: 0.420 (18th)
Avg. Season Rank: 19.60 (16th)
Pace: 70.35 (142nd)
Momentum: 0.11 (169th)
Off. Momentum: -0.15 (215th)
Def. Momentum: 0.26 (126th)
Consistency: -7.88 (60th)
Res. Consistency: -7.15 (6th)
Away From Home: 1.42 (64th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.53 (151st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 110.53 26.33 70.55 83.89 47.28 33.56 37.63 20.57 39.21 29.76 63.73 13.29 12.35 5.31 40.00 24.52 35.47 2.05
RANK: 28th 113th 199th 84th 36th 86th 25th 256th 134th 95th 51st 59th 203rd 128th 104th 270th 126th 206th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 90.38 26.42 -- 79.31 39.87 28.93 31.45 24.27 33.86 26.10 54.79 9.12 9.73 4.53 36.48 30.61 32.91 2.04
RANK: 22nd 240th -- 56th 34th 107th 50th 230th 38th 91st 54th 50th 12th 128th 144th 271st 120th 164th

ANALYSIS:
Texas is one of the teams in the upper echelon of college basketball this year. Carrying a record of 19-8, they are currently rated #22 overall (out of 357) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the 10 schools in the Big 12 (average ranking 59.8), they're currently ranked as our #3 team in the conference.

Texas is one of the most menacing defensive teams in the country. Ranked 22nd in defensive efficiency, they will allow fewer than 91 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Texas does a super job to deny opponents offensive rebounds and second chances. They have a rating of 9.73 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked 12th in the country). Texas will also take a bite out of many opponents' shooting percentages, based on the fact that the team ranks in the top-50 in three of our four primary defensive field goal categories. They'll inflict the most harm on the outside, allowing AO to convert just 31.4% of their three-pointers (50th in the nation), 33.9% of their mid-range chances (38th), and 39.9% of their total shots from the field (34th).

Texas plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 28th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 111 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Texas is one of the most accurate teams when shooting from long-distance. They're ranked 25th nationally in three-point field goal percentage and make about 37.6% of their attempts from there vs. AO. The team likewise falls in the top-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting about 47.3% of their attempts vs. AO. Texas also does a pretty good job of protecting the ball when they have possession and not allowing quick and easy baskets off of their own turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 9.12, which ranks #50 in the country.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, Texas often performs worse than normal. Texas is more efficient than usual 27% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 61.53%. In their other contests, Texas performs better than the norm 67% of the time.
Texas does worse vs. clubs that tend to get off more shots. When playing squads that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 83.78, Texas performs above average 33% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 67% of the time.
Texas performs worse against squads that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When facing teams that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 56.95%, Texas is more efficient than normal 33% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 67% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Thistlekeeping
(3/20/2021 11:04:52 AM) Random thoughts on a sunny, slightly chilly Saturday morning: 1. Are you watching basketball now? We are hooked. All those years of living in Kentucky and we are a basketball family. I have two brackets and I picked everything that started with Texas. So far,…
College basketball: Big second half lifts Tech past Ole Miss in first round of NIT – Bossier Press-Tribune - Bossier Press-Tribune Online
(3/20/2021 2:40:40 AM) College basketball: Big second half lifts Tech past Ole Miss in first round of NIT – Bossier Press-Tribune  Bossier Press-Tribune Online
Louisiana Tech uses big 2nd-half run to beat Ole Miss in NIT - USA TODAY
(3/19/2021 11:48:14 PM) Freshman Kenneth Lofton Jr. scored a season-high 22 points with seven rebounds and Louisiana Tech beat short-handed...
Louisiana Tech uses big 2nd-half run to beat Ole Miss in NIT - Minneapolis Star Tribune
(3/19/2021 11:37:25 PM) Freshman Kenneth Lofton Jr. scored a season-high 22 points with seven rebounds and Louisiana Tech beat short-handed Mississippi 70-61 on Friday night in the first round of the NIT Tournament.
Louisiana Tech uses big 2nd-half run to beat Ole Miss in NIT - SFGate
(3/19/2021 11:36:53 PM) FRISCO, Texas (AP) — Freshman Kenneth Lofton Jr. scored a season-high 22 points with...
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox