Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 UT Arlington 24-11 (0.686) | Sun Belt

All-Play Percentage: 0.760 (85^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.468 (202^nd)	Record Quality: 0.153 (98^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 70.02 (69^th)
Pace: 72.89 (35^th)	Momentum: -0.88 (210^th)	Off. Momentum: 0.26 (184^th)	Def. Momentum: -1.14 (220^th)
Consistency: -9.72 (279^th)	Res. Consistency: -13.89 (308^th)	Away From Home: -1.04 (274^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -3.07 (313^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

105.20

27.93

71.00

87.34

42.45

34.83

32.21

18.29

32.62

34.22

58.12

15.07

21.21

8.44

39.87

20.94

39.18

2.01

RANK:

112^th

194^th

133^rd

5^th

231^st

30^th

283^rd

324^th

304^th

21^st

189^th

9^th

7^th

47^th

63^rd

338^th

42^nd

190^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

95.42

28.92

77.90

41.41

33.34

35.72

23.57

32.90

21.00

59.99

10.23

13.41

4.63

42.79

30.25

26.96

2.16

RANK:

49^th

175^th

32^nd

69^th

330^th

222^nd

159^th

50^th

4^th

186^th

116^th

69^th

17^th

344^th

221^st

7^th

5^th

ANALYSIS:
UT Arlington has been extremely effective at times this year and should be regarded as a serious opponent. They have a record of 24-11 and are ranked 85th overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #2 team (out of 11) in the Sun Belt (average ranking 179.6).

The primary strength for UT Arlington is defense. The team is ranked 49th in efficiency, allowing fewer than 96 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UT Arlington thrives on scoring fast and easy points off of steals. They're ranked ninth in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 15.07. UT Arlington also does a fantastic job to prevent opposing teams from capitalizing on chances from offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.6% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 17th in the NCAA).

UT Arlington is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 112th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 105 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UT Arlington is one of the very best when it comes to maximizing field goal opportunities. The team is ranked fifth in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 87.34 vs. AO. As far as making those field goal attempts goes, the team is somewhat middle-of-the-road, converting about 42.4% of them vs. AO. UT Arlington also appears to be one of the top-notch offensive rebounding teams you will find this year. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 21.21 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked seventh in the NCAA), and they convert 8.4% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 47th) as well. If UT Arlington does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's inability to drain mid-range jumpers. The squad makes just 32.6% of their mid-range field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks 48th-worst in the nation.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Sat 11/14/2015	vs Fordham₁₄₆	W 74.70 - 65.00	W 77-72	1-0	101.62	105.53	▲ 3.91	93.61	102.92	▼ 9.31	▼ 5.40
Tue 11/17/2015	@ LA Tech₁₆₉	W 77.37 - 74.00	L 68-80	1-1	105.06	88.99	▼ 16.07	94.96	98.35	▼ 3.39	▼ 19.46
Fri 11/20/2015	@ Ohio State₉₀	L 69.39 - 73.20	W 73-68	2-1	98.66	110.27	▲ 11.61	98.28	95.63	▲ 2.65	▲ 14.26
Mon 11/23/2015	@ Memphis₇₅	L 73.83 - 79.42	W 68-64	3-1	99.32	90.10	▼ 9.22	100.71	80.20	▲ 20.51	▲ 11.29
Wed 11/25/2015	vs Grambling₃₄₄	W 81.60 - 55.51	W 73-40	4-1	111.85	90.30	▼ 21.55	80.85	46.25	▲ 34.60	▲ 13.05
Sun 11/29/2015	@ Rice₂₆₅	W 84.16 - 74.21	W 92-74	5-1	115.36	131.90	▲ 16.54	96.76	104.33	▼ 7.57	▲ 8.97
Tue 12/1/2015	@ Texas₄₁	L 66.78 - 75.69	L 73-80 (OT)	5-2	98.30	104.43	▲ 6.13	105.15	98.60	▲ 6.55	▲ 12.68
Thu 12/3/2015	vs North Texas₂₈₀	W 85.60 - 66.18	W 90-67	6-2	112.47	113.75	▲ 1.28	91.95	90.24	▲ 1.71	▲ 2.99
Sat 12/5/2015	@ UTEP₂₂₁	W 80.56 - 73.60	W 76-62	7-2	108.81	113.37	▲ 4.56	94.08	85.14	▲ 8.94	▲ 13.50
Tue 12/8/2015	vs Bradley₃₃₁	W 80.63 - 56.06	W 97-61	8-2	107.95	139.39	▲ 31.44	79.88	82.16	▼ 2.28	▲ 29.16
Mon 12/21/2015	vs Sul Ross	---	W 98-40	9-2	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Wed 12/30/2015	vs Georgia State₁₅₆	W 72.61 - 62.58	W 85-70	10-2	100.51	106.67	▲ 6.16	92.02	91.81	▲ 0.21	▲ 6.37
Sat 1/2/2016	vs Ga Southern₁₉₄	W 82.21 - 69.01	W 92-72	11-2	108.91	112.80	▲ 3.89	96.72	92.47	▲ 4.25	▲ 8.14
Thu 1/7/2016	@ Appalachian St.₂₆₄	W 81.65 - 71.60	W 71-67	12-2	112.41	88.46	▼ 23.95	93.24	76.84	▲ 16.40	▼ 7.55
Thu 1/14/2016	@ Troy₂₆₃	W 77.46 - 67.77	W 90-63	13-2	108.70	124.58	▲ 15.88	89.89	75.77	▲ 14.12	▲ 30.00
Sat 1/16/2016	@ South Alabama₂₅₀	W 76.26 - 67.62	L 85-88 (OT)	13-3	105.73	104.22	▼ 1.51	88.37	99.71	▼ 11.34	▼ 12.85
Thu 1/21/2016	vs Arkansas State₂₅₅	W 85.51 - 67.54	W 91-64	14-3	108.97	111.37	▲ 2.40	90.92	71.17	▲ 19.75	▲ 22.15
Sat 1/23/2016	vs Little Rock₅₉	W 68.78 - 67.49	L 62-68	14-4	97.82	84.23	▼ 13.59	100.82	97.36	▲ 3.46	▼ 10.13
Thu 1/28/2016	@ UL Monroe₁₂₁	L 71.53 - 71.99	L 88-99	14-5	103.88	116.08	▲ 12.20	99.08	124.71	▼ 25.63	▼ 13.43
Sat 1/30/2016	@ Louisiana₁₁₄	L 77.35 - 78.72	L 75-90	14-6	107.03	107.27	▲ 0.24	102.76	119.94	▼ 17.18	▼ 16.94
Thu 2/4/2016	@ Ga Southern₁₉₄	W 78.03 - 73.17	L 73-82	14-7	108.91	94.35	▼ 14.56	96.72	106.80	▼ 10.08	▼ 24.64
Sat 2/6/2016	@ Georgia State₁₅₆	W 68.62 - 66.53	W 90-69	15-7	100.51	130.19	▲ 29.68	92.02	97.08	▼ 5.06	▲ 24.62
Tue 2/9/2016	@ Texas State₂₁₅	W 70.20 - 64.18	W 65-53	16-7	105.56	102.92	▼ 2.64	90.85	41.31	▲ 49.54	▲ 46.90
Sat 2/13/2016	vs Appalachian St.₂₆₄	W 85.88 - 67.41	W 91-60	17-7	112.41	129.74	▲ 17.33	93.24	68.92	▲ 24.32	▲ 41.65
Thu 2/18/2016	vs Louisiana₁₁₄	W 81.56 - 74.53	W 84-83 (OT)	18-7	107.03	95.71	▼ 11.32	102.76	102.92	▼ 0.16	▼ 11.48
Sat 2/20/2016	vs UL Monroe₁₂₁	W 75.55 - 68.02	L 61-64	18-8	103.88	84.23	▼ 19.65	99.08	97.04	▲ 2.04	▼ 17.61
Thu 2/25/2016	@ Little Rock₅₉	L 64.90 - 71.49	L 60-72	18-9	97.82	89.48	▼ 8.34	100.82	104.55	▼ 3.73	▼ 12.07
Sat 2/27/2016	@ Arkansas State₂₅₅	W 81.17 - 71.89	W 79-75	19-9	108.97	96.97	▼ 12.00	90.92	85.32	▲ 5.60	▼ 6.40
Tue 3/1/2016	vs Texas State₂₁₅	W 74.08 - 60.41	W 75-69	20-9	105.56	104.23	▼ 1.33	90.85	101.49	▼ 10.64	▼ 11.97
Thu 3/3/2016	vs South Alabama₂₅₀	W 80.46 - 63.53	W 92-79	21-9	105.73	129.92	▲ 24.19	88.37	110.38	▼ 22.01	▲ 2.18
Sat 3/5/2016	vs Troy₂₆₃	W 81.62 - 63.85	W 90-55	22-9	108.70	133.82	▲ 25.12	89.89	75.83	▲ 14.06	▲ 39.18
Fri 3/11/2016	vs Texas State₂₁₅ *	W 72.14 - 62.29	W 72-63	23-9	105.56	100.00	▼ 5.56	90.85	84.72	▲ 6.13	▲ 0.57
Sat 3/12/2016	vs UL Monroe₁₂₁ *	W 73.54 - 70.01	L 71-82	23-10	103.88	101.47	▼ 2.41	99.08	118.84	▼ 19.76	▼ 22.17
Wed 3/16/2016	@ Savannah State₃₂₉	W 74.48 - 58.66	W 75-59	24-10	107.49	117.92	▲ 10.43	79.76	75.05	▲ 4.71	▲ 15.14
Thu 3/24/2016	@ NJIT₁₉₇	W 76.82 - 71.57	L 60-63	24-11	107.57	89.87	▼ 17.70	94.65	87.08	▲ 7.57	▼ 10.13
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	When playing teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities, UT Arlington usually performs better than average. UT Arlington is more efficient than normal 65% of the time when facing clubs that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 9.87. In all other contests, UT Arlington performs better than average 21% of the time.
	UT Arlington is typically better vs. teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. Against foes that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.76%, UT Arlington performs above their norm 61% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 18% of the time.
	When facing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, UT Arlington often performs worse than normal. UT Arlington is more efficient than usual 25% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 58.70%. In their other contests, UT Arlington performs better than the norm 67% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox