Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 Siena 17-17 (0.500) | MAAC

All-Play Percentage: 0.540 (162^nd)	Schedule Strength: 0.496 (163^rd)	Record Quality: 0.012 (164^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 168.95 (166^th)
Pace: 71.03 (124^th)	Momentum: 4.23 (20^th)	Off. Momentum: 3.67 (20^th)	Def. Momentum: 0.57 (86^th)
Consistency: -6.88 (6^th)	Res. Consistency: -7.69 (5^th)	Away From Home: 0.55 (92^nd)	Paper Tiger Factor: -1.51 (229^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

102.26

30.63

71.03

81.35

44.16

25.89

33.42

21.65

35.65

33.81

57.84

11.31

15.70

8.15

31.82

26.62

41.56

1.90

RANK:

154^th

61^st

152^nd

195^th

164^th

289^th

257^th

239^th

212^th

18^th

223^rd

134^th

108^th

46^th

289^th

243^rd

14^th

21^st

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

102.92

29.67

81.69

44.79

25.59

33.48

23.45

37.21

32.65

59.09

11.25

14.45

6.69

31.33

28.70

39.97

1.91

RANK:

186^th

248^th

168^th

186^th

27^th

70^th

159^th

187^th

320^th

142^nd

215^th

180^th

171^st

28^th

171^st

317^th

331^st

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, Siena should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. Their record this season is 17-17, and the club is ranked 162nd overall (out of 351) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #4 team (out of 11) in the MAAC (average ranking 203.1).

Based on the data, Siena will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 102 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #154 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. Siena will routinely look to penetrate, pound the ball inside, and score from as short a distance as possible. The ball-club is 14th in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. As far as converting those near-proximity shots goes, the team shoots 57.8% vs. AO, which falls somewhere in the middle of the pack of the rankings in that category. Siena is also one of the better teams in the country when it comes to converting scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team successfully converts 8.1% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 46th nationally).

Siena is not quite as good on the defensive end of the floor. The team is ranked 186th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 103 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Although their defense isn't the greatest, Siena doesn't stand out as being especially horrible in any one particular area on that end of the court, and they fall outside the bottom-100 in every one of the defensive categories we take into consideration for this analysis.

Siena has been playing some of its most efficient basketball of the season recently and is presently ranked 20th in positive momentum. Siena is also one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked sixth in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Sun 11/13/2016	vs Cornell₂₇₁	W 79.79 - 68.94	W 89-78	1-0	108.01	116.45	▲ 8.44	97.31	104.85	▼ 7.54	▲ 0.90
Tue 11/15/2016	@ G. Washington₁₂₈	L 69.59 - 74.41	L 75-77	1-1	103.13	109.36	▲ 6.23	105.79	106.24	▼ 0.45	▲ 5.78
Fri 11/18/2016	@ Kansas₆	L 65.26 - 89.73	L 65-86	1-2	92.56	93.12	▲ 0.56	121.74	121.22	▲ 0.52	▲ 1.08
Sun 11/20/2016	@ UNC Asheville₁₂₉	L 71.18 - 75.78	L 80-92	1-3	102.65	108.03	▲ 5.38	104.95	119.86	▼ 14.91	▼ 9.53
Wed 11/23/2016	vs AR-Pine Bluff₃₄₉	W 79.04 - 55.17	W 66-43	2-3	110.05	99.60	▼ 10.45	80.48	62.22	▲ 18.26	▲ 7.81
Sun 11/27/2016	@ Albany₁₁₈	L 67.84 - 73.10	L 72-81	2-4	102.56	111.04	▲ 8.48	105.02	113.50	▼ 8.48	▼ 0.00
Wed 11/30/2016	@ St. Bonaventure₈₃	L 69.56 - 78.86	L 74-81	2-5	99.14	92.46	▼ 6.68	107.90	99.03	▲ 8.87	▲ 2.19
Sat 12/3/2016	vs Fairfield₂₂₀	W 76.59 - 69.14	W 80-73	3-5	104.01	96.55	▼ 7.46	98.08	93.47	▲ 4.61	▼ 2.85
Mon 12/5/2016	@ Rider₂₁₀	W 74.93 - 74.33	L 69-71	3-6	102.97	94.52	▼ 8.45	97.89	88.81	▲ 9.08	▲ 0.63
Fri 12/9/2016	@ FGCU₁₀₉	L 69.18 - 75.60	L 69-73	3-7	102.24	103.69	▲ 1.45	106.40	103.58	▲ 2.82	▲ 4.27
Sat 12/17/2016	vs Bucknell₈₁	L 73.42 - 76.40	W 71-68	4-7	98.91	103.75	▲ 4.84	107.19	102.22	▲ 4.97	▲ 9.81
Thu 12/22/2016	@ Hofstra₁₉₅	L 75.97 - 76.83	L 64-84	4-8	109.45	93.12	▼ 16.33	106.14	117.19	▼ 11.05	▼ 27.38
Thu 12/29/2016	vs Vermont₆₄	L 67.62 - 73.08	L 60-76	4-9	97.23	81.12	▼ 16.11	108.99	111.31	▼ 2.32	▼ 18.43
Mon 1/2/2017	@ Canisius₁₈₇	L 76.26 - 77.66	L 79-82	4-10	107.20	108.97	▲ 1.77	104.78	108.60	▼ 3.82	▼ 2.05
Wed 1/4/2017	@ Niagara₂₄₉	W 75.70 - 72.87	L 66-71	4-11	107.05	90.22	▼ 16.83	98.86	93.73	▲ 5.13	▼ 11.70
Sat 1/7/2017	vs St. Peter's₁₂₅	W 64.92 - 63.64	W 56-54	5-11	97.50	82.63	▼ 14.87	99.60	84.03	▲ 15.57	▲ 0.70
Thu 1/12/2017	vs Quinnipiac₂₈₂	W 84.24 - 72.19	W 81-74	6-11	110.13	105.78	▼ 4.35	98.38	102.22	▼ 3.84	▼ 8.19
Sun 1/15/2017	@ Fairfield₂₂₀	W 73.44 - 72.20	W 63-54	7-11	104.01	100.65	▼ 3.36	98.08	82.16	▲ 15.92	▲ 12.56
Tue 1/17/2017	vs Rider₂₁₀	W 78.16 - 71.16	W 78-68	8-11	102.97	105.03	▲ 2.06	97.89	93.52	▲ 4.37	▲ 6.43
Thu 1/19/2017	@ St. Peter's₁₂₅	L 62.08 - 66.44	L 65-77	8-12	97.50	105.81	▲ 8.31	99.60	120.89	▼ 21.29	▼ 12.98
Sun 1/22/2017	@ Manhattan₂₉₂	W 75.63 - 69.34	W 81-68	9-12	106.28	110.67	▲ 4.39	93.52	81.84	▲ 11.68	▲ 16.07
Fri 1/27/2017	vs Iona₁₁₅	W 77.80 - 77.13	L 66-77	9-13	104.24	96.20	▼ 8.04	107.64	122.53	▼ 14.89	▼ 22.93
Mon 1/30/2017	@ Quinnipiac₂₈₂	W 80.96 - 75.37	W 84-75	10-13	110.13	116.71	▲ 6.58	98.38	90.43	▲ 7.95	▲ 14.53
Sat 2/4/2017	vs Canisius₁₈₇	W 79.43 - 74.46	L 73-80	10-14	107.20	97.78	▼ 9.42	104.78	108.88	▼ 4.10	▼ 13.52
Tue 2/7/2017	@ Iona₁₁₅	L 74.62 - 80.44	W 81-79	11-14	104.24	106.06	▲ 1.82	107.64	99.07	▲ 8.57	▲ 10.39
Sat 2/11/2017	@ Marist₃₀₁	W 77.38 - 70.25	W 84-77	12-14	112.25	122.22	▲ 9.97	98.14	109.38	▼ 11.24	▼ 1.27
Mon 2/13/2017	vs Monmouth₉₁	L 76.06 - 78.34	L 82-102	12-15	99.39	107.64	▲ 8.25	106.89	135.55	▼ 28.66	▼ 20.41
Thu 2/16/2017	vs Manhattan₂₉₂	W 78.79 - 66.15	W 94-71	13-15	106.28	125.48	▲ 19.20	93.52	89.91	▲ 3.61	▲ 22.81
Sat 2/18/2017	vs Niagara₂₄₉	W 78.85 - 69.64	W 76-70	14-15	107.05	101.89	▼ 5.16	98.86	88.70	▲ 10.16	▲ 5.00
Fri 2/24/2017	@ Monmouth₉₁	L 72.81 - 81.74	L 73-77	14-16	99.39	102.22	▲ 2.83	106.89	101.84	▲ 5.05	▲ 7.88
Sun 2/26/2017	vs Marist₃₀₁	W 80.46 - 67.15	W 80-64	15-16	112.25	126.82	▲ 14.57	98.14	94.28	▲ 3.86	▲ 18.43
Sat 3/4/2017	vs Fairfield₂₂₀ *	W 75.01 - 70.67	W 78-66	16-16	104.01	105.41	▲ 1.40	98.08	89.19	▲ 8.89	▲ 10.29
Sun 3/5/2017	vs Monmouth₉₁ *	L 74.43 - 80.04	W 89-85	17-16	99.39	117.11	▲ 17.72	106.89	114.86	▼ 7.97	▲ 9.75
Mon 3/6/2017	vs Iona₁₁₅ *	L 76.21 - 78.78	L 86-87 (OT)	17-17	104.24	110.61	▲ 6.37	107.64	110.61	▼ 2.97	▲ 3.40
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Siena does worse vs. clubs that tend to get off more shots. When playing squads that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 82.74, Siena performs above average 39% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 76% of the time.
	Siena performs worse against squads that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When facing teams that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 60.17%, Siena is more efficient than normal 36% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 74% of the time.
	When playing teams that find ways to get to the free throw line, Siena usually performs better than average. Siena is more efficient than normal 85% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 26.97. In all other contests, Siena performs better than average 48% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox