Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Rice11-21 (0.344) | American
All-Play Percentage: 0.438 (206th)
Schedule Strength: 0.497 (130th)
Record Quality: -0.121 (239th)
Avg. Season Rank: 195.82 (193rd)
Pace: 66.59 (270th)
Momentum: -2.50 (275th)
Off. Momentum: 0.78 (140th)
Def. Momentum: -3.28 (324th)
Consistency: -10.57 (321st)
Res. Consistency: -15.02 (334th)
Away From Home: 1.45 (39th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.55 (305th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
105.42
66.56
24.56
69.50
85.88
38.45
44.78
33.03
11.45
34.66
21.06
7.43
35.29
31.79
19.57
61.57
7.53
10.76
5.29
38.47
24.52
37.02
2.01
RANK:
174th
267th
252nd
280th
158th
127th
137th
129th
122nd
168th
232nd
286th
309th
135th
90th
77th
346th
304th
185th
128th
238th
143rd
192nd
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
109.46
66.63
21.96
--
88.85
40.02
45.05
34.52
13.10
37.96
23.25
8.05
34.64
31.09
18.87
60.70
11.45
13.64
6.18
38.85
26.16
34.99
2.04
RANK:
265th
92nd
27th
--
322nd
298th
229th
309th
347th
349th
206th
98th
23rd
191st
247th
287th
169th
197th
277th
266th
168th
129th
106th
ANALYSIS: They're far from the worst of the worst, but Rice should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. Their record this season is 11-21, and the club is ranked 206th overall (out of 362) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #13 team (out of 14) in the AAC (average ranking 135.3).
Rice will likely rely on their offense more than anything else to win games. The team is ranked 174th in offensive efficiency and scores more than 105 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Rice fares better than most teams when it comes to converting from locations close to the basket. The team is ranked 77th in the country in near-proximity field goal percentage, making approximately 61.6% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO.
Rice doesn't perform as well defensively as they do offensively. The team is ranked 265th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 109 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Rice does an extremely poor job to deny the opposition behind the arc. They rank 349th nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 38.0% of their attempts from afar. Rice is also extremely underskilled to force steals that turn into quick and easy points. They're ranked #346 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 7.53 vs. AO. If Rice does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to prevent opponents from draining shot attempts in between the three-point line and the low post. AO will convert just 34.6% of their mid-range field goal attempts, and the team is nationally ranked 23rd-best in that category as a result.
Rice has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 321st in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most. On the road, Rice performs somewhat better than their norm, as the squad is nationally ranked 39th in our away-from-home metric.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Rice does better vs. clubs that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. When playing squads that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 42.40%, Rice performs above average 59% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 11% of the time.
Rice performs better against squads that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When facing teams that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 56.11%, Rice is more efficient than normal 60% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 18% of the time.
When playing teams that convert well from outside the arc, Rice usually performs worse than average. Rice is more efficient than normal 25% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.96%. In all other contests, Rice performs better than average 67% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.