Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Radford 11-18 (0.379) | Big South

All-Play Percentage: 0.210 (284^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.371 (233^rd)	Record Quality: -0.238 (288^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 272.99 (277^th)
Pace: 66.39 (313^th)	Momentum: 2.16 (73^rd)	Off. Momentum: 2.03 (89^th)	Def. Momentum: 0.13 (137^th)
Consistency: -9.35 (200^th)	Res. Consistency: -7.54 (4^th)	Away From Home: -0.26 (216^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -0.82 (166^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

92.19

21.92

67.10

83.82

40.17

32.77

30.95

22.37

37.22

28.68

53.00

11.65

12.71

4.43

39.10

26.69

34.22

2.05

RANK:

315^th

268^th

316^th

166^th

321^st

130^th

321^st

215^th

199^th

185^th

321^st

141^st

196^th

228^th

131^st

222^nd

185^th

216^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

101.84

26.81

77.89

46.48

29.02

35.49

20.18

41.04

28.69

61.42

9.03

11.41

4.02

37.25

25.91

36.83

2.00

RANK:

199^th

285^th

15^th

309^th

81^st

265^th

48^th

307^th

174^th

272^nd

30^th

62^nd

79^th

173^rd

102^nd

276^th

244^th

ANALYSIS:
Radford presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. They have a record of 11-18 and are ranked 284th overall (out of 358) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #9 team (out of 12) in the Big South (average ranking 247.2).

Radford is not one of the better offensive teams you will find. They are rated #315 in efficiency on that end of the court and only score about 92 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Radford struggles to drain shots consistently from most spots on the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four primary field goal shooting categories. They only convert 31.0% of their three-pointers (321st in the nation), 53.0% of their near-proximity attempts (321st), and 40.2% of their total shots from the field (321st) vs. AO. Radford is also not one of the better teams when it comes to sinking foul shots. Converting just 67.1% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #316 overall in free throw percentage. If Radford does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's care for the ball. The squad has a rating of 9.03 in potential points allowed off of steals vs. AO, which ranks 30th in the college game.

Even though the team ranks considerably higher in defensive efficiency, Radford isn't a powerhouse on that end of the floor either. Allowing roughly 102 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #199 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Radford allows opponents' field goal percentages to get far too high. The ball-club ranks #309 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 46.5% of their total attempts from the floor. If Radford does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to limit the number of shot attempts by the opposition. The team has a defensive field goal attempt rate of 77.89 vs. AO, which ranks 15th-best in college basketball.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Tue 11/9/2021	vs Emory & Henry	---	W 84-72	1-0	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Fri 11/12/2021	@ Virginia₇₈	L 50.25 - 66.40	L 52-73	1-1	85.65	82.30	▼ 3.35	105.83	117.33	▼ 11.50	▼ 14.85
Mon 11/15/2021	@ Virginia Tech₂₄	L 52.02 - 73.65	L 39-65	1-2	84.53	64.58	▼ 19.95	112.16	91.08	▲ 21.08	▲ 1.13
Fri 11/19/2021	@ Furman₇₉	L 57.26 - 74.70	L 64-81	1-3	90.35	95.21	▲ 4.86	111.32	110.15	▲ 1.17	▲ 6.03
Sat 11/20/2021	vs Navy₁₉₅ *	L 57.03 - 62.14	L 33-47	1-4	87.34	42.42	▼ 44.92	94.34	68.66	▲ 25.68	▼ 19.24
Wed 11/24/2021	vs William & Mary₃₃₃	W 68.58 - 60.13	W 67-54	2-4	97.54	102.17	▲ 4.63	89.92	84.64	▲ 5.28	▲ 9.91
Sun 11/28/2021	vs E. Kentucky₂₆₄	W 70.14 - 67.50	W 88-75	3-4	97.13	109.33	▲ 12.20	98.06	104.06	▼ 6.00	▲ 6.20
Tue 11/30/2021	vs Kentucky Chr	---	W 79-70	4-4	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 12/4/2021	@ West Virginia₆₄	L 55.73 - 74.93	L 51-67	4-5	84.64	72.88	▼ 11.76	107.48	103.45	▲ 4.03	▼ 7.73
Sat 12/11/2021	@ JMU₂₂₃	L 63.70 - 71.27	L 70-79	4-6	94.93	96.01	▲ 1.08	99.89	99.93	▼ 0.04	▲ 1.04
Mon 12/13/2021	@ G. Washington₂₂₉	L 61.36 - 68.40	L 58-67	4-7	92.56	77.28	▼ 15.28	97.34	94.15	▲ 3.19	▼ 12.09
Sat 12/18/2021	@ Davidson₃₇	L 56.29 - 76.92	L 54-74	4-8	89.92	88.88	▼ 1.04	115.22	110.44	▲ 4.78	▲ 3.74
Thu 1/6/2022	@ USC Upstate₂₆₉	L 65.73 - 70.31	W 82-77	5-8	98.31	119.81	▲ 21.50	99.67	104.27	▼ 4.60	▲ 16.90
Sat 1/8/2022	vs NC A&T₂₉₃	W 66.56 - 62.16	L 72-73	5-9	96.31	111.61	▲ 15.30	94.50	120.41	▼ 25.91	▼ 10.61
Wed 1/12/2022	vs Longwood₁₅₉	L 63.05 - 66.58	L 75-83 (OT)	5-10	92.53	98.80	▲ 6.27	102.05	104.14	▼ 2.09	▲ 4.18
Sat 1/15/2022	@ Campbell₂₁₄	L 57.58 - 64.78	L 58-70	5-11	93.59	106.24	▲ 12.65	99.84	120.96	▼ 21.12	▼ 8.47
Wed 1/19/2022	vs Hampton₃₃₄	W 67.79 - 59.39	W 54-51	6-11	95.40	79.15	▼ 16.25	88.53	81.13	▲ 7.40	▼ 8.85
Sat 1/22/2022	vs UNC Asheville₂₂₀	L 64.86 - 65.46	L 74-78 (OT)	6-12	93.83	97.33	▲ 3.50	99.33	99.17	▲ 0.16	▲ 3.66
Wed 1/26/2022	@ High Point₂₅₁	L 61.35 - 66.90	L 58-63	6-13	94.62	98.94	▲ 4.32	97.14	97.33	▼ 0.19	▲ 4.13
Sat 1/29/2022	@ Gardner-Webb₁₇₂	L 56.62 - 66.76	L 42-61	6-14	86.42	65.94	▼ 20.48	95.96	103.21	▼ 7.25	▼ 27.73
Wed 2/2/2022	vs Charleston So.₃₄₁	W 70.87 - 61.05	W 64-52	7-14	100.43	98.97	▼ 1.46	90.53	87.92	▲ 2.61	▲ 1.15
Sat 2/5/2022	vs Presbyterian₂₅₆	W 61.38 - 59.51	L 70-78	7-15	92.25	115.97	▲ 23.72	94.57	137.15	▼ 42.58	▼ 18.86
Wed 2/9/2022	@ Winthrop₁₇₃	L 62.92 - 73.17	L 48-58	7-16	93.99	76.44	▼ 17.55	103.73	90.77	▲ 12.96	▼ 4.59
Sat 2/12/2022	@ Hampton₃₃₄	W 64.29 - 62.92	W 60-54	8-16	95.40	88.39	▼ 7.01	88.53	75.59	▲ 12.94	▲ 5.93
Wed 2/16/2022	vs Campbell₂₁₄	L 60.79 - 61.56	W 71-67	9-16	93.59	110.03	▲ 16.44	99.84	109.02	▼ 9.18	▲ 7.26
Sat 2/19/2022	vs High Point₂₅₁	W 64.72 - 63.52	W 66-64	10-16	94.62	102.09	▲ 7.47	97.14	104.26	▼ 7.12	▲ 0.35
Wed 2/23/2022	@ Longwood₁₅₉	L 59.69 - 70.07	L 66-71	10-17	92.53	112.67	▲ 20.14	102.05	115.66	▼ 13.61	▲ 6.53
Sat 2/26/2022	@ NC A&T₂₉₃	L 63.15 - 65.56	W 62-53	11-17	96.31	90.00	▼ 6.31	94.50	69.68	▲ 24.82	▲ 18.51
Wed 3/2/2022	vs NC A&T₂₉₃ *	W 64.85 - 63.86	L 71-78 (OT)	11-18	96.31	95.24	▼ 1.07	94.50	95.24	▼ 0.74	▼ 1.81
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Radford is typically better vs. teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. Against foes that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 36.74%, Radford performs above their norm 78% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 22% of the time.
	When facing teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint, Radford often performs better than normal. Radford is more efficient than usual 85% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 60.88%. In their other contests, Radford performs better than the norm 36% of the time.
	Radford does worse vs. clubs that effectively clean the offensive glass. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.91, Radford performs above average 25% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 74% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	North Carolina A&T beats Radford in Big South tourney (3/2/2022 3:20:27 PM) Marcus Watson had 18 points and 11 rebounds to lift North Carolina A&T to a 78-71 overtime win over Radford in the first round of the Big South Conference tournament on Wednesday.
	Jules lifts Radford over Hampton 54-51 (1/19/2022 9:24:20 PM) RADFORD, Va. (AP) — Shaquan Jules scored 11 points and grabbed 14 rebounds and made 1 of 2 foul shots to help send Radford to a 54-51 win over Hampton...
	Williams, Radford visit Davidson (12/16/2021 3:32:54 PM) Radford (4-7) vs. Davidson (7-2)
	Molson scores 14 to send James Madison past Radford 79-70 (12/11/2021 10:19:19 PM) HARRISONBURG, Va. (AP) — Takal Molson tossed in 14 points as James Madison topped Radford 79-70 on Saturday night.
	Carter Jr. scores 13 to lift Navy over Radford 47-33 (11/20/2021 7:44:41 PM) GREENVILLE, S.C. (AP) — John Carter Jr. had 13 points as Navy beat Radford 47-33 on Saturday.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox