Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Quinnipiac 9-13 (0.409) | MAAC

All-Play Percentage: 0.284 (256^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.263 (340^th)	Record Quality: -0.275 (308^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 259.56 (265^th)
Pace: 72.15 (61^st)	Momentum: -1.46 (244^th)	Off. Momentum: -0.76 (249^th)	Def. Momentum: -0.70 (189^th)
Consistency: -10.06 (258^th)	Res. Consistency: -12.54 (198^th)	Away From Home: -2.45 (328^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -1.83 (241^st)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

90.91

23.19

67.91

80.20

39.91

34.25

32.53

17.30

33.42

28.65

52.65

9.45

9.77

3.52

42.71

21.57

35.72

2.07

RANK:

307^th

236^th

279^th

252^nd

324^th

67^th

254^th

327^th

321^st

147^th

333^rd

263^rd

322^nd

309^th

49^th

325^th

115^th

246^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

98.75

27.12

83.41

42.16

29.65

32.57

22.05

34.90

31.71

56.19

14.46

15.54

6.75

35.55

26.44

38.02

1.98

RANK:

145^th

270^th

236^th

98^th

136^th

100^th

129^th

64^th

315^th

81^st

340^th

328^th

333^rd

104^th

112^th

304^th

297^th

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but Quinnipiac should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. They have a record of 9-13 and are ranked 256th overall (out of 357) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 11 schools in the MAAC (average ranking 258.6), they're currently ranked as our #5 team in the conference. With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.263 (which ranks 340th in the nation), Quinnipiac has faced some of the easiest opponents in all of college basketball.

If there is a strength for Quinnipiac this year, it's probably on the defensive end of the court. The team is rated 145th in defensive efficiency, allowing fewer than 99 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Quinnipiac has been fairly decent in preventing teams from draining shots from between the three-point stripe and the low post. They're ranked 64th in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 34.9% of their attempts from that distance. If Quinnipiac does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's issues trying to stop opponents from obtaining and converting second-chance opportunities via offensive rebounds. The squad has a defensive second-chance conversion percentage of 6.8% vs. AO, which ranks 25th-worst in the nation.

Unfortunately, Quinnipiac is not even remotely close to being as good on offense as they are on defense. The team is ranked 307th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 91 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Quinnipiac tends to be very careless with the ball and allows far too many breakaway opportunities off of their own turnovers. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 14.46, which ranks 340th in D1. Quinnipiac also struggles to drain shots consistently from most spots on the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four primary field goal shooting categories. They are worse off shooting inside the three-point stripe, making good on just 33.4% of their mid-range jumpers (321st in the nation), 52.7% of their near-proximity chances (333rd), and 39.9% of their total shots from the field (324th) vs. AO.

When playing on the road, Quinnipiac performs somewhat worse than they normally do on their home court. The club is nationally ranked 328th in our site's away-from-home metric.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Wed 11/25/2020	vs Fair. Dickinson₂₈₁	W 76.50 - 71.44	W 84-66	1-0	100.00	117.86	▲ 17.86	98.23	84.95	▲ 13.28	▲ 31.14
Wed 12/2/2020	vs Drexel₁₄₂ *	L 63.41 - 70.85	L 48-66	1-1	91.43	71.08	▼ 20.35	102.88	97.74	▲ 5.14	▼ 15.21
Thu 12/3/2020	vs Drexel₁₄₂ *	L 63.41 - 70.85	L 58-70	1-2	91.43	91.99	▲ 0.56	102.88	111.02	▼ 8.14	▼ 7.58
Sun 12/6/2020	vs UNH₂₅₅	W 67.55 - 64.78	W 64-58	2-2	93.87	79.91	▼ 13.96	92.92	76.50	▲ 16.42	▲ 2.46
Fri 1/8/2021	vs Manhattan₃₀₅	W 67.54 - 60.60	W 84-79 (2OT)	3-2	92.18	84.88	▼ 7.30	86.32	94.56	▼ 8.24	▼ 15.54
Sat 1/9/2021	vs Manhattan₃₀₅	W 67.54 - 60.60	L 42-45	3-3	92.18	67.86	▼ 24.32	86.32	75.91	▲ 10.41	▼ 13.91
Fri 1/15/2021	@ Monmouth₂₄₁	L 71.16 - 75.36	L 80-92 (OT)	3-4	94.30	81.03	▼ 13.27	95.51	78.75	▲ 16.76	▲ 3.49
Sat 1/16/2021	@ Monmouth₂₄₁	L 71.16 - 75.36	L 63-70	3-5	94.30	88.47	▼ 5.83	95.51	93.75	▲ 1.76	▼ 4.07
Fri 1/22/2021	vs Niagara₂₅₈	W 67.39 - 64.54	L 56-59	3-6	95.39	75.37	▼ 20.02	95.47	80.22	▲ 15.25	▼ 4.77
Sat 1/23/2021	vs Niagara₂₅₈	W 67.39 - 64.54	W 78-69	4-6	95.39	122.65	▲ 27.26	95.47	100.50	▼ 5.03	▲ 22.23
Sun 2/7/2021	@ Fairfield₃₁₅	W 65.37 - 63.59	W 78-63	5-6	96.90	121.19	▲ 24.29	89.91	88.49	▲ 1.42	▲ 25.71
Mon 2/8/2021	@ Fairfield₃₁₅	W 65.37 - 63.59	L 70-77	5-7	96.90	105.08	▲ 8.18	89.91	102.27	▼ 12.36	▼ 4.18
Fri 2/12/2021	vs Canisius₂₆₈	W 70.22 - 66.55	L 67-74	5-8	94.67	84.24	▼ 10.43	93.14	100.48	▼ 7.34	▼ 17.77
Sat 2/13/2021	vs Canisius₂₆₈	W 70.22 - 66.55	L 70-89	5-9	94.67	85.55	▼ 9.12	93.14	120.32	▼ 27.18	▼ 36.30
Wed 2/17/2021	vs Iona₁₇₉	L 65.67 - 67.89	W 74-70	6-9	90.17	100.64	▲ 10.47	96.48	98.93	▼ 2.45	▲ 8.02
Sat 2/20/2021	vs Rider₃₁₉	W 74.83 - 67.01	W 80-64	7-9	102.74	105.82	▲ 3.08	95.78	89.64	▲ 6.14	▲ 9.22
Sun 2/21/2021	vs Rider₃₁₉	W 74.83 - 67.01	W 93-68	8-9	102.74	134.31	▲ 31.57	95.78	71.95	▲ 23.83	▲ 55.40
Sun 2/28/2021	@ Marist₂₇₈	L 63.82 - 64.83	L 67-76	8-10	91.93	99.24	▲ 7.31	89.53	109.22	▼ 19.69	▼ 12.38
Mon 3/1/2021	@ Marist₂₇₈	L 63.82 - 64.83	L 52-65	8-11	91.93	78.61	▼ 13.32	89.53	94.88	▼ 5.35	▼ 18.67
Thu 3/4/2021	vs St. Peter's₂₂₃	W 62.98 - 62.34	W 65-60	9-11	85.95	80.49	▼ 5.46	88.99	80.83	▲ 8.16	▲ 2.70
Fri 3/5/2021	vs St. Peter's₂₂₃	W 62.98 - 62.34	L 64-66	9-12	85.95	89.29	▲ 3.34	88.99	97.44	▼ 8.45	▼ 5.11
Tue 3/9/2021	vs Iona₁₇₉ *	L 64.22 - 69.41	L 48-72	9-13	90.17	59.68	▼ 30.49	96.48	93.65	▲ 2.83	▼ 27.66
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	When facing teams that convert well from outside the arc, Quinnipiac often performs better than normal. Quinnipiac is more efficient than usual 57% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 31.27%. In their other contests, Quinnipiac performs better than the norm 13% of the time.
	Quinnipiac does better vs. clubs that aren't terribly skilled defensively. When playing squads that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 100.83, Quinnipiac performs above average 58% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 20% of the time.
	Quinnipiac performs better against squads that allow more chances at the line. When facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 27.12, Quinnipiac is more efficient than normal 58% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 20% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Wright scores 13 to lead Marist over Quinnipiac 76-67 (2/28/2021 7:15:27 PM) POUGHKEEPSIE, N.Y. (AP) — Ricardo Wright had 13 points and seven rebounds as Marist beat Quinnipiac 76-67 on Sunday.
	Kortright scores 25 to lift Quinnipiac past Rider 93-68 (2/21/2021 3:36:45 PM) HAMDEN, Conn. (AP) — Luis Kortright had a career-high 25 points as Quinnipiac romped past Rider 93-68 on Sunday.
	Williams scores 21 to carry Quinnipiac past Iona 74-70 (2/17/2021 7:47:34 PM) HAMDEN, Conn. (AP) — Tyrese Williams had a season-high 21 points as Quinnipiac edged past Iona 74-70 on Wednesday.
	Fritz scores 18 to lift Canisius over Quinnipiac 74-67 (2/12/2021 5:44:21 PM) HAMDEN, Conn. (AP) — Jacco Fritz registered 18 points and nine rebounds as Canisius defeated Quinnipiac 74-67 on Friday.
	Benning scores 23 to carry Fairfield over Quinnipiac 77-70 (2/8/2021 5:04:51 PM) FAIRFIELD, Conn. (AP) — Taj Benning had a career-high 23 points as Fairfield got past Quinnipiac 77-70 on Monday.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox