Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Presbyterian 12-20 (0.375) | Big South

All-Play Percentage: 0.283 (256^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.383 (225^th)	Record Quality: -0.237 (287^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 260.16 (263^rd)
Pace: 66.14 (322^nd)	Momentum: 0.88 (139^th)	Off. Momentum: 0.43 (174^th)	Def. Momentum: 0.45 (121^st)
Consistency: -8.22 (66^th)	Res. Consistency: -9.35 (33^rd)	Away From Home: 1.26 (69^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -0.81 (165^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

93.87

23.45

68.82

85.69

40.34

31.05

27.68

26.81

35.17

27.83

59.46

11.24

15.50

5.12

36.24

31.29

32.48

2.04

RANK:

292^nd

205^th

278^th

73^rd

313^th

195^th

356^th

73^rd

300^th

229^th

147^th

163^rd

68^th

141^st

220^th

89^th

249^th

199^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

101.96

29.65

76.14

45.91

27.72

37.16

20.77

35.97

27.65

62.15

11.62

11.75

4.76

36.41

27.28

36.31

2.00

RANK:

206^th

341^st

6^th

288^th

41^st

333^rd

66^th

103^rd

124^th

297^th

221^st

78^th

156^th

138^th

151^st

255^th

250^th

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but Presbyterian should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. They are ranked #256 (out of 358) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 12-20. Of the 12 schools in the Big South (average ranking 247.2), they're currently ranked as our #7 team in the conference.

Offense is not the strong suit when it comes to Presbyterian. The team is ranked 292nd in offensive efficiency and scores fewer than 94 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Presbyterian is one of the least accurate teams when shooting from long-distance. They are ranked third from the bottom in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 27.7% of their attempts from long vs. AO. Moreover, they find themselves in the bottom-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting just 40.3% of their total attempts vs. AO.

Though they rate better on defense than they do on offense, Presbyterian still isn't one of the more capable defensive teams in college hoops. Allowing roughly 102 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #206 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Presbyterian fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 29.65 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #341 in the country in that category. Presbyterian also does a very lackluster job preventing opponents from draining threes. They rank 333rd nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 37.2% of their attempts from afar. If Presbyterian does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to limit the number of shot attempts by the opposition. The team has a defensive field goal attempt rate of 76.14 vs. AO, which ranks sixth-best in college basketball.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Tue 11/9/2021	@ Clemson₆₇	L 57.00 - 74.22	L 53-64	0-1	88.83	77.67	▼ 11.16	108.58	97.33	▲ 11.25	▲ 0.09
Fri 11/12/2021	vs VMI₁₅₃	L 68.77 - 71.70	W 73-72 (OT)	1-1	98.56	98.94	▲ 0.38	107.33	101.11	▲ 6.22	▲ 6.60
Mon 11/15/2021	vs The Citadel₂₅₅	W 70.77 - 67.21	W 74-70 (2OT)	2-1	99.60	87.80	▼ 11.80	98.68	94.61	▲ 4.07	▼ 7.73
Thu 11/18/2021	@ Cincinnati₁₀₀	L 56.98 - 71.21	L 45-79	2-2	87.64	64.89	▼ 22.75	102.16	104.22	▼ 2.06	▼ 24.81
Wed 11/24/2021	vs VMI₁₅₃ *	L 67.03 - 73.56	W 61-54	3-2	98.56	93.65	▼ 4.91	107.33	85.71	▲ 21.62	▲ 16.71
Thu 11/25/2021	@ New Orleans₂₇₆	L 67.46 - 70.12	W 70-66	4-2	97.27	98.45	▲ 1.18	95.13	87.74	▲ 7.39	▲ 8.57
Fri 11/26/2021	vs Cent. Arkansas₃₁₆ *	W 73.21 - 68.60	W 75-66	5-2	102.77	117.19	▲ 14.42	95.99	100.00	▼ 4.01	▲ 10.41
Tue 11/30/2021	@ Tennessee₁₃	L 50.73 - 76.28	L 44-86	5-3	78.49	65.17	▼ 13.32	109.91	121.82	▼ 11.91	▼ 25.23
Fri 12/3/2021	vs Bob Jones	---	W 90-61	6-3	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Mon 12/6/2021	@ Morehead State₁₂₆	L 56.84 - 67.92	L 66-71	6-4	90.55	102.67	▲ 12.12	101.05	108.27	▼ 7.22	▲ 4.90
Sun 12/12/2021	@ Charleston₁₃₃	L 65.24 - 77.29	L 76-78 (OT)	6-5	91.38	104.08	▲ 12.70	102.34	97.33	▲ 5.01	▲ 17.71
Wed 12/15/2021	vs Carver College	---	W 98-33	7-5	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 12/18/2021	vs Wofford₁₁₆	L 60.99 - 66.05	L 49-76	7-6	92.69	76.96	▼ 15.73	104.71	116.71	▼ 12.00	▼ 27.73
Tue 12/21/2021	@ Furman₇₉	L 58.03 - 74.25	L 61-75	7-7	91.96	99.39	▲ 7.43	110.99	117.00	▼ 6.01	▲ 1.42
Thu 12/30/2021	vs Tru-Mc	---	W 91-49	8-7	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Wed 1/5/2022	@ NC A&T₂₉₃	L 64.03 - 64.95	L 57-65	8-8	98.07	87.75	▼ 10.32	93.89	92.78	▲ 1.11	▼ 9.21
Sat 1/8/2022	vs USC Upstate₂₆₉	W 70.14 - 66.20	L 72-82	8-9	100.07	101.81	▲ 1.74	99.36	125.06	▼ 25.70	▼ 23.96
Wed 1/12/2022	@ Gardner-Webb₁₇₂	L 57.51 - 66.22	L 61-64	8-10	88.15	92.38	▲ 4.23	95.46	90.08	▲ 5.38	▲ 9.61
Thu 1/20/2022	vs Winthrop₁₇₃	L 67.31 - 69.05	L 58-60	8-11	95.70	81.39	▼ 14.31	103.21	90.58	▲ 12.63	▼ 1.68
Sat 1/22/2022	vs Longwood₁₅₉	L 63.87 - 66.06	L 70-71	8-12	94.17	100.27	▲ 6.10	101.59	104.10	▼ 2.51	▲ 3.59
Wed 1/26/2022	@ Charleston So.₃₄₁	W 68.22 - 63.97	W 62-61	9-12	102.10	99.55	▼ 2.55	89.96	89.75	▲ 0.21	▼ 2.34
Sat 1/29/2022	vs UNC Asheville₂₂₀	W 65.70 - 64.96	L 67-68	9-13	95.48	95.81	▲ 0.33	98.89	102.67	▼ 3.78	▼ 3.45
Wed 2/2/2022	vs Campbell₂₁₄	W 61.56 - 60.99	W 64-58	10-13	95.23	90.08	▼ 5.15	99.25	86.73	▲ 12.52	▲ 7.37
Sat 2/5/2022	@ Radford₂₈₄	L 59.51 - 61.38	W 78-70	11-13	94.57	137.15	▲ 42.58	92.25	115.97	▼ 23.72	▲ 18.86
Mon 2/7/2022	@ Hampton₃₃₄	W 65.22 - 62.36	L 69-74	11-14	97.17	97.19	▲ 0.02	87.98	101.19	▼ 13.21	▼ 13.19
Wed 2/9/2022	vs High Point₂₅₁	W 65.61 - 62.91	L 70-79	11-15	96.36	100.27	▲ 3.91	96.53	117.16	▼ 20.63	▼ 16.72
Sat 2/12/2022	@ Winthrop₁₇₃	L 63.80 - 72.59	L 61-65	11-16	95.70	95.10	▼ 0.60	103.21	95.81	▲ 7.40	▲ 6.80
Wed 2/16/2022	@ USC Upstate₂₆₉	L 66.64 - 69.88	L 55-60	11-17	100.07	80.14	▼ 19.93	99.36	83.04	▲ 16.32	▼ 3.61
Sat 2/19/2022	vs Gardner-Webb₁₇₂	L 60.95 - 62.73	L 68-76	11-18	88.15	89.98	▲ 1.83	95.46	109.92	▼ 14.46	▼ 12.63
Wed 2/23/2022	vs Charleston So.₃₄₁	W 71.73 - 60.47	W 68-48	12-18	102.10	103.45	▲ 1.35	89.96	80.09	▲ 9.87	▲ 11.22
Sat 2/26/2022	@ UNC Asheville₂₂₀	L 62.27 - 68.50	L 96-98 (3OT)	12-19	95.48	108.55	▲ 13.07	98.89	106.01	▼ 7.12	▲ 5.95
Wed 3/2/2022	vs Campbell₂₁₄ *	L 59.94 - 62.59	L 72-75 (2OT)	12-20	95.23	93.22	▼ 2.01	99.25	94.83	▲ 4.42	▲ 2.41
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Presbyterian does worse vs. clubs that allow more chances at the line. When playing squads that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 22.74, Presbyterian performs above average 40% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 89% of the time.
	Presbyterian performs better against squads that tend to get off more shots. When facing teams that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 83.15, Presbyterian is more efficient than normal 79% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 33% of the time.
	When playing teams that shoot the ball well from the field, Presbyterian usually performs better than average. Presbyterian is more efficient than normal 79% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.02%. In all other contests, Presbyterian performs better than average 33% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Hampton hosts Longwood after Hill’s 23-point showing (1/23/2022 3:03:13 AM) Longwood Lancers (12-5, 4-0 Big South) at Hampton Pirates (5-10, 1-3 Big South)
	Good scores 31 to carry Winthrop over Presbyterian 60-58 (1/20/2022 9:14:45 PM) CLINTON, S.C. (AP) — Patrick Good made seven 3-pointers and scored 31 points as Winthrop narrowly beat Presbyterian 60-58 on Thursday night.
	The Citadel beats St. Andrews Presbyterian 102-62 (12/16/2021 10:46:27 PM) CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) — Hayden Brown scored 25 points as The Citadel easily defeated St. Andrews Presbyterian 102-62 on Thursday night. Jason Roche ad...
	Stewart lifts Presbyterian past Carver College 98-33 (12/15/2021 9:47:56 PM) CLINTON, S.C. (AP) — Kobe Stewart posted 19 points as Presbyterian rolled past Carver College 98-33 on Wednesday night.
	The Citadel squares off against St. Andrews Presbyterian (12/15/2021 6:33:03 AM) St. Andrews Presbyterian vs. The Citadel (5-3)

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox