Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 PV A&M10-21 (0.323) | SWAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.100 (326th)
Schedule Strength: 0.297 (320th)
Record Quality: -0.377 (335th)
Avg. Season Rank: 286.20 (292nd)
Pace: 71.23 (25th)
Momentum: -3.71 (312th)
Off. Momentum: -1.40 (279th)
Def. Momentum: -2.31 (288th)
Consistency: -9.13 (174th)
Res. Consistency: -9.68 (26th)
Away From Home: 1.01 (66th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.54 (13th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
94.58
71.08
27.44
72.63
82.54
34.17
41.40
20.37
6.31
30.99
31.47
10.82
34.40
30.71
17.03
55.48
15.44
12.28
5.28
24.68
38.12
37.20
1.87
RANK:
332nd
27th
138th
157th
308th
329th
298th
362nd
360th
324th
16th
65th
333rd
182nd
219th
245th
26th
226th
188th
362nd
10th
140th
12th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
110.47
71.38
33.48
--
78.37
38.23
48.78
28.89
10.49
36.31
18.92
7.57
39.99
30.56
20.17
66.02
11.13
15.67
6.87
36.87
24.14
38.99
1.98
RANK:
290th
340th
352nd
--
8th
207th
359th
69th
146th
306th
26th
46th
239th
167th
302nd
361st
148th
324th
333rd
177th
83rd
289th
247th
ANALYSIS: If you're looking for a squad in the bottom quartile of all Division I basketball teams this year, PV A&M likely fits the bill. Ranked 326th overall (out of 362) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 10-21. Of the 12 schools in the SWAC (average ranking 319.3), they're currently ranked as our #8 team in the conference.
PV A&M is not one of the better offensive teams you will find. They are rated #332 in efficiency on that end of the court and only score about 95 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. PV A&M needs improvement when it comes to draining the mid-range shot. The team is ranked 333rd in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 34.4% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO. PV A&M also won't enter the conversation if you're looking to list the best three-point shooting teams in the country. They are ranked 324th in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 31.0% of their attempts from long vs. AO.
PV A&M doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 110 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #290 in the nation in defensive efficiency. PV A&M fares terribly when attempting to stop opponents from converting from the inside. The team is ranked second from the bottom in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 66.0% of their attempts from close-up. PV A&M is also one of the very worst teams in the country in terms of overall defensive field goal percentage. The ball-club ranks #359 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 48.8% of their total attempts from the floor. PV A&M lastly fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 33.48 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #352 in the country in that category. If PV A&M does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to limit the number of shot attempts by the opposition. The team has a defensive field goal attempt rate of 78.37 vs. AO, which ranks eighth-best in college basketball.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter, PV A&M usually performs worse than average. PV A&M is more efficient than normal 21% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.03. In all other contests, PV A&M performs better than average 70% of the time.
PV A&M is typically better vs. teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. Against foes that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 11.49, PV A&M performs above their norm 67% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 25% of the time.
When facing teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass, PV A&M often performs better than normal. PV A&M is more efficient than usual 56% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.52%. In their other contests, PV A&M performs better than the norm 15% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.