TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 PV A&M  10-21 (0.323)  |  SWAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.100 (326th)
Schedule Strength: 0.297 (320th)
Record Quality: -0.377 (335th)
Avg. Season Rank: 286.20 (292nd)
Pace: 71.23 (25th)
Momentum: -3.71 (312th)
Off. Momentum: -1.40 (279th)
Def. Momentum: -2.31 (288th)
Consistency: -9.13 (174th)
Res. Consistency: -9.68 (26th)
Away From Home: 1.01 (66th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.54 (13th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 94.58 27.44 72.63 82.54 41.40 20.37 30.99 31.47 34.40 30.71 55.48 15.44 12.28 5.28 24.68 38.12 37.20 1.87
RANK: 332nd 138th 157th 308th 298th 362nd 324th 16th 333rd 182nd 245th 26th 226th 188th 362nd 10th 140th 12th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 110.47 33.48 -- 78.37 48.78 28.89 36.31 18.92 39.99 30.56 66.02 11.13 15.67 6.87 36.87 24.14 38.99 1.98
RANK: 290th 352nd -- 8th 359th 69th 306th 26th 239th 167th 361st 148th 324th 333rd 177th 83rd 289th 247th

ANALYSIS:
If you're looking for a squad in the bottom quartile of all Division I basketball teams this year, PV A&M likely fits the bill. Ranked 326th overall (out of 362) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 10-21. Of the 12 schools in the SWAC (average ranking 319.3), they're currently ranked as our #8 team in the conference.

PV A&M is not one of the better offensive teams you will find. They are rated #332 in efficiency on that end of the court and only score about 95 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. PV A&M needs improvement when it comes to draining the mid-range shot. The team is ranked 333rd in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 34.4% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO. PV A&M also won't enter the conversation if you're looking to list the best three-point shooting teams in the country. They are ranked 324th in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 31.0% of their attempts from long vs. AO.

PV A&M doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 110 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #290 in the nation in defensive efficiency. PV A&M fares terribly when attempting to stop opponents from converting from the inside. The team is ranked second from the bottom in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 66.0% of their attempts from close-up. PV A&M is also one of the very worst teams in the country in terms of overall defensive field goal percentage. The ball-club ranks #359 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 48.8% of their total attempts from the floor. PV A&M lastly fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 33.48 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #352 in the country in that category. If PV A&M does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to limit the number of shot attempts by the opposition. The team has a defensive field goal attempt rate of 78.37 vs. AO, which ranks eighth-best in college basketball.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter, PV A&M usually performs worse than average. PV A&M is more efficient than normal 21% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.03. In all other contests, PV A&M performs better than average 70% of the time.
PV A&M is typically better vs. teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. Against foes that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 11.49, PV A&M performs above their norm 67% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 25% of the time.
When facing teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass, PV A&M often performs better than normal. PV A&M is more efficient than usual 56% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.52%. In their other contests, PV A&M performs better than the norm 15% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox