Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 PV A&M 16-5 (0.762) | SWAC

All-Play Percentage: 0.202 (286^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.209 (345^th)	Record Quality: 0.123 (114^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 279.75 (289^th)
Pace: 71.34 (94^th)	Momentum: -3.98 (314^th)	Off. Momentum: -0.95 (259^th)	Def. Momentum: -3.03 (318^th)
Consistency: -8.92 (144^th)	Res. Consistency: -10.54 (84^th)	Away From Home: 0.15 (172^nd)	Paper Tiger Factor: -2.56 (288^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

91.99

18.95

64.10

83.44

42.71

29.62

28.91

21.85

35.66

31.97

60.32

13.44

14.12

4.66

35.50

26.19

38.31

1.97

RANK:

300^th

351^st

336^th

107^th

222^nd

215^th

345^th

222^nd

262^nd

40^th

129^th

51^st

100^th

192^nd

241^st

233^rd

52^nd

72^nd

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

98.99

33.00

76.89

45.23

29.16

33.51

16.82

38.71

30.91

59.83

11.76

15.68

4.93

37.93

21.88

40.20

1.98

RANK:

150^th

353^rd

19^th

249^th

117^th

160^th

4^th

190^th

292^nd

208^th

231^st

333^rd

174^th

202^nd

8^th

339^th

292^nd

ANALYSIS:
Despite having a win percentage north of .500, PV A&M is definitely a below-average ball-club in college hoops this year. Ranked 286th overall (out of 357) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 16-5. Of the 10 schools in the SWAC (average ranking 326.5), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference. With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.209 (which ranks 345th nationally), PV A&M has had one of the cushiest slates in all of college basketball.

If there is a strength for PV A&M this year, it's probably on the defensive end of the court. The team is rated 150th in defensive efficiency, allowing fewer than 99 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. PV A&M has extremely pesky defenders that ceaselessly attempt to deny opponents ample opportunity to shoot. The club is ranked 19th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 76.89 vs. AO. PV A&M will also look to secure a relatively healthy number of easy scoring opportunities off of steals. They're ranked 51st in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 13.44. (Predictably, this aggressive style of play tends to result in too many fouls -- the team has a defensive free throw attempt rate of 33.00, ranked #353 in the country -- so they need to be wary of opponents that can convert from the foul line.) If PV A&M does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's difficulties stopping opponents from obtaining second-chance opportunities via offensive rebounds. The squad has a rating of 15.68 in potential points allowed off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 25th-worst in college hoops.

The offense for PV A&M, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the defense is. The team is ranked 300th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 92 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. PV A&M does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 18.95 vs. AO, they are seventh from the bottom in the overall rankings for that category. PV A&M is also one of the least accurate teams when shooting from long-distance. They are ranked 345th in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 28.9% of their attempts from long vs. AO. PV A&M lastly has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 64.1% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #336 overall in free throw percentage.

PV A&M has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 314th in the country in positive momentum.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Wed 11/25/2020	vs Little Rock₂₃₆ *	L 66.41 - 69.60	L 66-71	0-1	94.53	94.51	▼ 0.02	98.42	101.66	▼ 3.24	▼ 3.26
Fri 11/27/2020	vs Evansville₂₃₅ *	L 65.76 - 69.22	W 64-61	1-1	99.08	96.97	▼ 2.11	104.02	92.42	▲ 11.60	▲ 9.49
Sun 11/29/2020	@ Louisville₆₉	L 57.66 - 76.35	L 64-86	1-2	85.40	102.14	▲ 16.74	107.00	135.36	▼ 28.36	▼ 11.62
Mon 12/21/2020	@ Washington St.₈₈	L 58.32 - 75.80	L 62-90	1-3	84.32	90.02	▲ 5.70	103.57	114.28	▼ 10.71	▼ 5.01
Wed 12/30/2020	@ TCU₁₄₀	L 62.67 - 74.69	L 61-66	1-4	92.29	83.20	▼ 9.09	104.64	84.42	▲ 20.22	▲ 11.13
Mon 1/11/2021	vs Texas Southern₂₃₉	L 71.31 - 71.87	W 71-67	2-4	94.38	90.07	▼ 4.31	98.42	89.15	▲ 9.27	▲ 4.96
Mon 1/18/2021	vs Grambling₃₂₈	W 71.83 - 64.59	W 59-50	3-4	97.58	80.67	▼ 16.91	91.61	71.10	▲ 20.51	▲ 3.60
Sat 1/23/2021	@ Miss. Valley St.₃₅₇	W 83.10 - 61.22	W 77-31	4-4	112.12	126.11	▲ 13.99	79.75	48.58	▲ 31.17	▲ 45.16
Mon 1/25/2021	@ AR-Pine Bluff₃₅₆	W 75.87 - 62.83	W 73-56	5-4	108.14	141.00	▲ 32.86	86.26	72.99	▲ 13.27	▲ 46.13
Sat 1/30/2021	vs Alabama A&M₃₄₆	W 69.64 - 59.05	W 79-57	6-4	96.39	102.41	▲ 6.02	85.31	72.47	▲ 12.84	▲ 18.86
Mon 2/1/2021	vs Alabama State₃₅₄	W 77.11 - 59.45	W 87-63	7-4	100.92	106.43	▲ 5.51	81.91	83.92	▼ 2.01	▲ 3.50
Sun 2/21/2021	@ Texas Southern₂₃₉	L 68.37 - 74.97	W 77-75	8-4	94.38	100.54	▲ 6.16	98.42	93.71	▲ 4.71	▲ 10.87
Tue 2/23/2021	vs AR-Pine Bluff₃₅₆	W 78.71 - 59.86	W 72-56	9-4	108.14	100.89	▼ 7.25	86.26	82.44	▲ 3.82	▼ 3.43
Thu 2/25/2021	vs Miss. Valley St.₃₅₇	W 86.10 - 58.46	W 82-62	10-4	112.12	101.42	▼ 10.70	79.75	79.81	▼ 0.06	▼ 10.76
Sat 2/27/2021	@ Alabama A&M₃₄₆	W 66.83 - 61.85	W 55-54	11-4	96.39	72.65	▼ 23.74	85.31	70.35	▲ 14.96	▼ 8.78
Mon 3/1/2021	@ Alabama State₃₅₄	W 74.14 - 62.39	W 70-67	12-4	100.92	90.75	▼ 10.17	81.91	83.76	▼ 1.85	▼ 12.02
Thu 3/4/2021	vs Southern₃₂₅	W 72.17 - 65.01	W 68-61	13-4	96.75	91.98	▼ 4.77	90.81	85.41	▲ 5.40	▲ 0.63
Sat 3/6/2021	vs Alcorn State₃₄₇	W 76.45 - 65.40	W 81-69	14-4	103.19	102.72	▼ 0.47	92.43	90.32	▲ 2.11	▲ 1.64
Wed 3/10/2021	vs Miss. Valley St.₃₅₇ *	W 84.60 - 59.84	W 91-64	15-4	112.12	115.94	▲ 3.82	79.75	88.24	▼ 8.49	▼ 4.67
Fri 3/12/2021	vs Grambling₃₂₈ *	W 70.39 - 66.05	W 75-63	16-4	97.58	110.61	▲ 13.03	91.61	92.42	▼ 0.81	▲ 12.22
Sat 3/13/2021	vs Texas Southern₂₃₉ *	L 69.84 - 73.42	L 61-80	16-5	94.38	83.58	▼ 10.80	98.42	114.93	▼ 16.51	▼ 27.31
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

When playing teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot, PV A&M usually performs worse than average. PV A&M is more efficient than normal 23% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.82%. In all other contests, PV A&M performs better than average 63% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Mack scores 24 to lead Prairie View past Alabama St. 87-63 (2/2/2021 12:11:17 AM) PRAIRIE VIEW, Texas (AP) — Cam Mack matched his career high with 24 points plus 10 assists as Prairie View rolled past Alabama State 87-63 on Monday night.
	Gambrell leads Prairie View over Arkansas-Pine Bluff 73-56 (1/25/2021 9:35:10 PM) PINE BLUFF, Ark. (AP) — Jeremiah Gambrell Jr. had a career-high 23 points as Prairie View beat Arkansas-Pine Bluff 73-56 on Monday night.
	#UAPBMensHoops Falls To Prairie View A&M (1/25/2021 3:20:00 PM) The University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff men's basketball team came up short in a 73-56 loss to the Prairie View A&M Panthers at home Monday.
	Abogidi double-double helps WSU cruise by Prairie View 90-62 (12/21/2020 9:25:28 PM) PULLMAN, Wash. - Efe Abogidi scored 16 points with 14 rebounds and a career-best four blocked shots as Washington State remained unbeaten, dispatching...
	GCU men's basketball game against Prairie View canceled (12/3/2020 8:27:30 PM) GCU men's basketball will not play against Prairie View A&M due to COVID-19 concerns.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox