Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Vanderbilt9-23 (0.281) | SEC
All-Play Percentage: 0.521 (174th)
Schedule Strength: 0.681 (44th)
Record Quality: -0.090 (229th)
Avg. Season Rank: 186.26 (183rd)
Pace: 66.24 (288th)
Momentum: 1.92 (86th)
Off. Momentum: 2.11 (75th)
Def. Momentum: -0.19 (158th)
Consistency: -7.99 (39th)
Res. Consistency: -10.27 (48th)
Away From Home: -0.03 (182nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.37 (119th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
104.63
66.20
27.81
71.43
87.96
37.18
42.27
33.51
10.40
31.03
25.87
9.44
36.49
28.57
17.34
60.70
12.16
14.29
4.59
38.10
29.41
32.48
2.06
RANK:
190th
290th
122nd
215th
61st
193rd
274th
118th
220th
323rd
99th
139th
283rd
266th
204th
89th
139th
135th
273rd
139th
111th
300th
281st
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
107.22
66.27
23.29
--
86.87
38.29
44.08
34.31
12.48
36.38
22.03
8.55
38.81
30.53
17.26
56.54
8.76
13.76
6.49
39.50
25.36
35.14
2.04
RANK:
215th
76th
61st
--
260th
212th
172nd
303rd
326th
311th
152nd
155th
179th
165th
148th
125th
15th
209th
314th
294th
134th
139th
99th
ANALYSIS: Vanderbilt is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. They have a record of 9-23 and are ranked 174th overall (out of 362) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of 14) in the SEC (average ranking 62.8).
Defensively, Vanderbilt finds itself in the lower half of our ratings. The team is ranked 215th in defensive efficiency, giving up more than 107 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Vanderbilt gives up too many chances to easily score off of offensive rebounds. The team allows AO to convert 6.5% of all second-chance opportunities (314th nationally).
Vanderbilt doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 105 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #190 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Vanderbilt won't enter the conversation if you're looking to list the best three-point shooting teams in the country. They are ranked 323rd in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 31.0% of their attempts from long vs. AO. If Vanderbilt does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's care for the ball. The squad has a rating of 8.76 in potential points allowed off of steals vs. AO, which ranks 15th in the college game.
Vanderbilt is one of the more consistent teams in Division I (presently ranked 39th in consistency), so forecasting the outcomes of their future contests tends to be easier than the norm.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that find ways to get to the free throw line, Vanderbilt often performs better than normal. Vanderbilt is more efficient than usual 100% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 29.64. In their other contests, Vanderbilt performs better than the norm 43% of the time.
Vanderbilt does worse vs. clubs that prefer the outside shot. When playing squads that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 1.99, Vanderbilt performs above average 40% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 82% of the time.
Vanderbilt performs better against squads that effectively clean the offensive glass. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 14.95, Vanderbilt is more efficient than normal 85% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 47% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.