TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Oregon  21-7 (0.750)  |  Pac-12
All-Play Percentage: 0.947 (20th)
Schedule Strength: 0.778 (34th)
Record Quality: 0.497 (8th)
Avg. Season Rank: 29.32 (25th)
Pace: 67.97 (269th)
Momentum: 2.04 (84th)
Off. Momentum: 4.72 (4th)
Def. Momentum: -2.68 (306th)
Consistency: -8.68 (121st)
Res. Consistency: -11.19 (126th)
Away From Home: 0.35 (151st)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.64 (157th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 114.18 24.26 71.43 85.90 48.93 33.03 38.69 20.56 41.81 32.31 63.93 14.82 13.96 6.02 38.46 23.93 37.61 2.01
RANK: 11th 187th 171st 31st 12th 105th 8th 258th 55th 34th 46th 29th 110th 72nd 158th 283rd 65th 129th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 94.82 19.74 -- 81.96 42.04 32.80 33.30 20.18 36.83 28.97 55.56 10.95 11.14 4.92 40.03 24.62 35.35 2.05
RANK: 74th 23rd -- 168th 91st 268th 148th 55th 126th 208th 68th 163rd 76th 172nd 286th 51st 222nd 140th

ANALYSIS:
Oregon is a top-25 caliber squad that should be able to remain competitive with most, if not all, teams in the country. Their record this season is 21-7, and the club is ranked 20th overall (out of 357) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #3 team (out of 12) in the Pac-12 (average ranking 54.0).

Oregon is undoubtedly one of the best in the business on offense. The team is rated 11th in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 114 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Oregon is an excellent shooting team, capable of converting from multiple locations on the court and ranking in the top-50 in three of our four primary field goal categories. They convert 38.7% of their three-pointers (eighth in the nation), 63.9% of their near-proximity attempts (46th), and 48.9% of their total shots from the field (12th) vs. AO. Oregon also has one of the better squads in the college game when it comes to maximizing opportunities to score. The team is ranked 31st in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 85.90 vs. AO.

Oregon is also a fairly decent team on the defensive end of the court. The team ranks 74th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 95 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Oregon is a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 19.74 vs. AO, they are currently rated 23rd in the country in that category. Oregon also does a pretty solid job providing themselves chances to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked 29th in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 14.82.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that convert well from the charity stripe, Oregon often performs better than normal. Oregon is more efficient than usual 78% of the time when facing teams that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 0.71%. In their other contests, Oregon performs better than the norm 10% of the time.
Oregon does worse vs. clubs that allow more chances at the line. When playing squads that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 24.29, Oregon performs above average 18% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 77% of the time.
Oregon performs better against squads that do not defend well on the perimeter. When facing teams that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 32.56%, Oregon is more efficient than normal 79% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 29% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
NCAA Tournament 2021 scores, takeaways: Sweet 16 field set as teams combine for highest seed total in history - CBSSports.com
(3/22/2021 11:56:19 PM) <ol><li>NCAA Tournament 2021 scores, takeaways: Sweet 16 field set as teams combine for highest seed total in history  CBSSports.com </li><li>As 'the shots were falling, the energy was going,' and Dana Altman's Oregon Ducks made a statement in NCAA men's bas…
NCAA Tournament scores, winners and losers: Oregon, UCLA boost Pac-12's profile as Big Ten collapses
(3/22/2021 9:00:48 PM) The maligned Pac-12 is sending more teams to the Sweet 16 than the heralded Big Ten
Canzano: Oregon Ducks in the Sweet 16 is the most Dana Altman thing ever - OregonLive
(3/22/2021 8:02:19 PM) <ol><li>Canzano: Oregon Ducks in the Sweet 16 is the most Dana Altman thing ever  OregonLive </li><li>Iowa's Luka Garza in tears after early tournament exit: 'Something that's gonna haunt me forever'  Yahoo Sports </li><li>Leistikow: Luka Garza scores 36 po…
The Big Ten has flopped in the NCAA tournament. Was it overrated all along?
(3/22/2021 7:28:36 PM) Nine Big Ten teams secured NCAA tournament bids on Selection Sunday, more than any other league in college basketball. Michigan and Maryland are the only two still alive.
Winners and losers from men's NCAA Tournament second-round games
(3/22/2021 6:24:40 PM) Gonzaga and Oregon move on to Sweet 16, but Iowa and Oklahoma are headed home after the opening games of Monday's second round.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox