Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Chattanooga 27-8 (0.771) | Southern

All-Play Percentage: 0.762 (86^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.454 (147^th)	Record Quality: 0.281 (55^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 86.01 (86^th)
Pace: 66.58 (307^th)	Momentum: 1.71 (93^rd)	Off. Momentum: -2.01 (306^th)	Def. Momentum: 3.73 (7^th)
Consistency: -8.23 (67^th)	Res. Consistency: -9.88 (54^th)	Away From Home: 0.20 (156^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: 0.85 (46^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

105.87

23.42

75.43

86.13

44.74

32.66

34.11

23.06

42.57

30.41

57.78

12.19

13.49

6.12

37.91

26.78

35.31

2.03

RANK:

82^nd

208^th

58^th

110^th

136^th

150^th

190^th

23^rd

109^th

196^th

108^th

152^nd

55^th

167^th

216^th

149^th

173^rd

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

95.09

23.16

83.53

42.33

29.32

28.89

26.06

38.10

28.15

60.24

10.49

11.38

3.67

35.10

31.20

33.71

2.01

RANK:

75^th

149^th

172^nd

124^th

86^th

5^th

299^th

198^th

147^th

226^th

125^th

59^th

44^th

96^th

303^rd

142^nd

220^th

ANALYSIS:
Chattanooga has been extremely effective at times this year and should be regarded as a serious opponent. Ranked 86th overall (out of 358) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 27-8. Of the 10 schools in the Southern (average ranking 176.3), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference.

Chattanooga will mainly try to find success through their defense. They are ranked 75th in defensive efficiency and allow fewer than 96 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Chattanooga does an outstanding job shutting down the opposition from behind the arc. They rank fifth in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 28.9% of their attempts from afar. Chattanooga is also one of the better teams when it comes to not allowing opponents to convert scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 3.7% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 44th in the NCAA).

Chattanooga plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 82nd nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 106 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Chattanooga is superb at converting jumpers in between the three-point stripe and the low post. The squad is ranked 23rd nationally in mid-range field goal percentage, making about 42.6% of their attempts from those locations vs. AO. Chattanooga also does a pretty solid job of scoring points off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team successfully converts 6.1% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 55th nationally).

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Tue 11/9/2021	@ Loyola Marymount₁₉₂	W 70.87 - 65.97	W 75-64	1-0	109.43	115.37	▲ 5.94	97.71	93.77	▲ 3.94	▲ 9.88
Sun 11/14/2021	vs UNC Asheville₂₂₀	W 74.59 - 61.18	W 75-45	2-0	107.37	114.98	▲ 7.61	93.16	70.33	▲ 22.83	▲ 30.44
Tue 11/16/2021	vs Tenn. Tech₂₄₁	W 77.55 - 62.42	W 69-62	3-0	108.62	106.85	▼ 1.77	92.53	99.55	▼ 7.02	▼ 8.79
Sat 11/20/2021	@ VCU₆₀	L 61.39 - 66.92	W 56-54	4-0	92.78	102.67	▲ 9.89	95.42	95.57	▼ 0.15	▲ 9.74
Tue 11/23/2021	vs Covenant	---	W 100-39	5-0	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 11/27/2021	vs Charleston₁₃₃	W 78.84 - 69.31	L 66-68	5-1	103.57	92.63	▼ 10.94	96.60	101.22	▼ 4.62	▼ 15.56
Tue 11/30/2021	@ Tenn. Tech₂₄₁	W 73.83 - 65.89	W 82-65	6-1	108.62	125.25	▲ 16.63	92.53	89.26	▲ 3.27	▲ 19.90
Sun 12/5/2021	@ Lipscomb₂₆₈	W 76.75 - 66.99	W 85-64	7-1	113.30	122.98	▲ 9.68	94.85	89.64	▲ 5.21	▲ 14.89
Wed 12/8/2021	@ UNC Asheville₂₂₀	W 70.97 - 64.72	W 78-73	8-1	107.37	124.55	▲ 17.18	93.16	113.20	▼ 20.04	▼ 2.86
Sun 12/12/2021	vs Tenn Wesleyan	---	W 104-55	9-1	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Wed 12/15/2021	@ Belmont₈₃	L 67.70 - 71.70	L 68-76	9-2	101.31	101.13	▼ 0.18	101.42	111.17	▼ 9.75	▼ 9.93
Sat 12/18/2021	@ Murray State₃₂	L 63.74 - 71.57	L 76-87	9-3	98.77	101.22	▲ 2.45	105.28	117.33	▼ 12.05	▼ 9.60
Wed 12/22/2021	vs Mid Tennessee₉₉	W 69.67 - 64.42	W 77-65	10-3	100.50	109.27	▲ 8.77	98.04	96.06	▲ 1.98	▲ 10.75
Thu 12/30/2021	vs ETSU₁₈₃	W 74.99 - 63.91	W 82-52	11-3	110.88	125.90	▲ 15.02	99.17	87.74	▲ 11.43	▲ 26.45
Wed 1/5/2022	@ Wofford₁₁₆	W 66.03 - 65.74	W 75-67	12-3	104.55	110.02	▲ 5.47	98.69	91.36	▲ 7.33	▲ 12.80
Sat 1/8/2022	vs The Citadel₂₅₅	W 80.02 - 63.58	W 85-67	13-3	111.56	118.08	▲ 6.52	93.37	95.21	▼ 1.84	▲ 4.68
Wed 1/12/2022	@ W. Carolina₃₀₆	W 76.42 - 63.62	L 59-70	13-4	113.77	82.09	▼ 31.68	90.13	95.55	▼ 5.42	▼ 37.10
Sat 1/15/2022	vs Furman₇₉	W 69.85 - 66.92	W 71-69	14-4	103.66	113.72	▲ 10.06	105.00	117.19	▼ 12.19	▼ 2.13
Thu 1/20/2022	@ UNCG₁₈₆	W 64.14 - 60.07	W 72-64	15-4	103.44	106.64	▲ 3.20	92.21	91.10	▲ 1.11	▲ 4.31
Sat 1/22/2022	@ VMI₁₅₃	W 74.11 - 71.32	W 78-74	16-4	110.42	120.85	▲ 10.43	101.19	109.45	▼ 8.26	▲ 2.17
Wed 1/26/2022	vs Wofford₁₁₆	W 69.49 - 62.25	W 71-60	17-4	104.55	113.72	▲ 9.17	98.69	94.34	▲ 4.35	▲ 13.52
Sat 1/29/2022	@ The Citadel₂₅₅	W 76.28 - 67.10	W 75-62	18-4	111.56	105.49	▼ 6.07	93.37	83.97	▲ 9.40	▲ 3.33
Wed 2/2/2022	@ Samford₂₀₃	W 73.70 - 67.96	L 72-80	18-5	108.31	102.67	▼ 5.64	96.03	111.61	▼ 15.58	▼ 21.22
Sat 2/5/2022	vs Mercer₁₉₆	W 73.49 - 61.48	W 77-68	19-5	109.52	123.04	▲ 13.52	96.46	109.12	▼ 12.66	▲ 0.86
Mon 2/7/2022	@ Mercer₁₉₆	W 69.99 - 64.98	W 74-72 (OT)	20-5	109.52	103.03	▼ 6.49	96.46	95.61	▲ 0.85	▼ 5.64
Wed 2/9/2022	vs W. Carolina₃₀₆	W 80.09 - 60.16	W 65-47	21-5	113.77	95.77	▼ 18.00	90.13	71.42	▲ 18.71	▲ 0.71
Sat 2/12/2022	@ Furman₇₉	L 66.34 - 70.44	W 64-58	22-5	103.66	101.13	▼ 2.53	105.00	85.21	▲ 19.79	▲ 17.26
Thu 2/17/2022	vs UNCG₁₈₆	W 67.54 - 56.78	L 70-73	22-6	103.44	101.81	▼ 1.63	92.21	110.02	▼ 17.81	▼ 19.44
Sat 2/19/2022	vs VMI₁₅₃	W 77.78 - 67.59	L 75-80	22-7	110.42	107.62	▼ 2.80	101.19	122.07	▼ 20.88	▼ 23.68
Wed 2/23/2022	@ ETSU₁₈₃	W 71.46 - 67.35	W 83-77	23-7	110.88	116.37	▲ 5.49	99.17	104.27	▼ 5.10	▲ 0.39
Sat 2/26/2022	vs Samford₂₀₃	W 77.42 - 64.34	W 70-57	24-7	108.31	102.02	▼ 6.29	96.03	84.21	▲ 11.82	▲ 5.53
Sat 3/5/2022	vs The Citadel₂₅₅ *	W 78.14 - 65.34	W 71-66	25-7	111.56	109.23	▼ 2.33	93.37	94.03	▼ 0.66	▼ 2.99
Sun 3/6/2022	vs Wofford₁₁₆ *	W 67.76 - 63.99	W 79-56	26-7	104.55	130.19	▲ 25.64	98.69	84.31	▲ 14.38	▲ 40.02
Mon 3/7/2022	vs Furman₇₉ *	L 68.09 - 68.68	W 64-63 (OT)	27-7	103.66	87.55	▼ 16.11	105.00	89.47	▲ 15.53	▼ 0.58
Fri 3/18/2022	vs Illinois₁₇ *	L 64.26 - 71.49	L 53-54	27-8	96.01	81.54	▼ 14.47	106.39	81.82	▲ 24.57	▲ 10.10
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Chattanooga performs better against squads that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.89%, Chattanooga is more efficient than normal 75% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 33% of the time.
	When playing teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot, Chattanooga usually performs worse than average. Chattanooga is more efficient than normal 20% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 40.00%. In all other contests, Chattanooga performs better than average 61% of the time.
	Chattanooga is typically worse vs. teams that tend to get off more shots. Against foes that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 83.14, Chattanooga performs above their norm 29% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 69% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	March Madness 2022: Illinois survives dramatic final minute to beat upset-minded Chattanooga (3/18/2022 9:30:17 PM) The Fighting Illini were looking to avoid yet another early exit in the NCAA Tournament
	Video: Chattanooga Clinches NCAA Men's Tournament Berth on Dramatic OT Buzzer-Beater (3/8/2022 12:02:28 AM) The madness has already started with Selection Sunday still six days away. The Chattanooga Mocs clinched their spot in the NCAA men's basketball tournament...
	Smith scores 25 to lift Chattanooga into SoCon final (3/6/2022 7:13:18 PM) ASHEVILLE, N.C. (AP) — Malachi Smith had 25 points and 11 rebounds as Chattanooga rolled past Wofford 79-56 in the semifinals of the Southern Conferen...
	Ledford leads Chattanooga past E. Tennessee St. 83-77 (2/23/2022 10:28:15 PM) JOHNSON CITY, Tenn. (AP) — Grant Ledford had a career-high 25 points as Chattanooga topped East Tennessee State 83-77 on Wednesday night.
	No. 7 Tennessee routs Chattanooga 91-41 (12/27/2021 8:38:49 PM) KNOXVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Tamari Key scored 18 points to lead No. 7 Tennessee to a 91-41 rout of University of Tennessee Chattanooga on Monday night.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox