TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 NC A&T  3-29 (0.094)  |  MEAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.020 (344th)
Schedule Strength: 0.286 (339th)
Record Quality: -0.712 (351st)
Avg. Season Rank: 337.54 (339th)
Pace: 65.75 (339th)
Momentum: -0.44 (192nd)
Off. Momentum: 2.15 (81st)
Def. Momentum: -2.59 (293rd)
Consistency: -9.75 (274th)
Res. Consistency: -10.85 (137th)
Away From Home: 0.63 (84th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 4.42 (1st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 92.50 25.33 71.52 80.54 40.74 27.14 32.30 23.89 36.75 29.51 51.72 8.48 15.46 6.15 33.70 29.66 36.64 1.97
RANK: 317th 252nd 134th 237th 308th 249th 295th 164th 162nd 114th 332nd 305th 117th 221st 242nd 149th 100th 88th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 118.77 32.31 -- 86.31 47.10 36.30 39.07 20.77 40.18 29.25 61.98 12.93 17.55 7.56 42.05 24.06 33.89 2.08
RANK: 350th 329th -- 328th 292nd 342nd 327th 64th 317th 207th 232nd 320th 339th 255th 331st 28th 137th 47th

ANALYSIS:
NC A&T is a poor basketball team, arguably one of the very worst in all of college hoops. Their record this season is 3-29, and the club is ranked eighth from the bottom overall (out of 351) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #12 team (out of 13) in the MEAC (average ranking 319.3). With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.286 (which ranks 339th in the nation), NC A&T has faced some of the easiest opponents in all of college basketball.

NC A&T has a very sieve-like defense that gives up points way too easily. The team is ranked second from the bottom in efficiency on that end of the court and gives up more than 118 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. NC A&T gives up far too many offensive rebounds and second chances to their opponents. The club has a rating of 17.55 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (339th nationally). NC A&T also fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 32.31 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #329 in the country in that category. NC A&T lastly allows the opposition to get off far too many shots from the floor. The team is ranked 328th in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 86.31 vs. AO.

NC A&T doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 93 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #317 in the nation in offensive efficiency. NC A&T will have a really tough time winning games when taking into consideration their shooting percentage near the basket. The team is ranked 332nd in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 51.7% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. Moreover, they find themselves in the bottom-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting just 40.7% of their total attempts vs. AO. NC A&T also has some difficulty protecting the ball efficiently when in possession, which leads to some quick and easy baskets for the opposition. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 12.93, which ranks 320th in D1.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
NC A&T performs better against squads that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.75%, NC A&T is more efficient than normal 89% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 38% of the time.
When playing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, NC A&T usually performs better than average. NC A&T is more efficient than normal 67% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 52.50%. In all other contests, NC A&T performs better than average 22% of the time.
NC A&T is typically better vs. teams that shoot the ball well from the field. Against foes that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 42.75%, NC A&T performs above their norm 80% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 40% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox