TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 UNLV  18-15 (0.545)  |  Mountain West
All-Play Percentage: 0.677 (114th)
Schedule Strength: 0.595 (95th)
Record Quality: 0.105 (120th)
Avg. Season Rank: 133.32 (133rd)
Pace: 66.23 (136th)
Momentum: 1.32 (100th)
Off. Momentum: 2.62 (60th)
Def. Momentum: -1.29 (215th)
Consistency: -9.37 (199th)
Res. Consistency: -8.93 (24th)
Away From Home: -0.48 (220th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.81 (173rd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.93 28.30 62.92 82.34 45.32 28.50 36.80 25.55 37.05 28.28 61.38 11.27 14.33 6.91 34.62 31.04 34.35 2.00
RANK: 110th 191st 336th 158th 69th 155th 66th 170th 93rd 178th 86th 171st 224th 145th 163rd 178th 185th 191st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 97.71 25.17 -- 88.71 40.20 27.76 35.60 27.02 33.18 33.93 49.54 10.46 16.37 5.03 31.29 30.46 38.25 1.93
RANK: 105th 45th -- 346th 53rd 165th 229th 246th 75th 329th 4th 92nd 256th 27th 68th 150th 294th 297th

ANALYSIS:
They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but UNLV, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. Ranked 114th overall (out of 351) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 18-15. They are also ranked by this site as the #5 team (out of 11) in the MWC (average ranking 148.0).

Based on their performances this year, UNLV will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 98 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #105 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. UNLV does tremendous work shutting down the opposition from the inside. They are ranked fourth in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 49.5% of their attempts from close-up. UNLV is also one of the better teams when it comes to not allowing opponents to convert scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 5.0% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 27th in the NCAA). If UNLV does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's propensity to allow too many shot attempts per trip. The squad has a rating of 88.71 in defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks sixth-worst in college basketball.

UNLV plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 110th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 103 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UNLV has been generally quite good when shooting the three-pointer. They're ranked 66th nationally in three-point field goal percentage and make about 36.8% of their attempts from there vs. AO. UNLV has also been fairly successful when shooting from the field. The squad is ranked 69th in the country in field goal percentage, making approximately 45.3% of their attempts vs. AO. If UNLV does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's poor shooting at the line. The squad makes just 62.9% of their free throw attempts, which ranks 16th-worst in Division I.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that convert well from outside the arc, UNLV often performs worse than normal. UNLV is more efficient than usual 27% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.52%. In their other contests, UNLV performs better than the norm 67% of the time.
UNLV does better vs. clubs that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 8.01%, UNLV performs above average 80% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 41% of the time.
UNLV performs worse against squads that shoot the ball well from the field. When facing teams that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.19%, UNLV is more efficient than normal 35% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 73% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox